" Windows 8 is a confusing mess, whether running on a tablet or standard personal computer"
"The biggest difference is that Windows RT does not support "legacy" or "desktop" applications. "
Ja raju tilitys Microsoftin surkeasta tilanteesta tiivistyy:
"Bray's mistake is, to me, an indicator of just how far off the consumer radar Microsoft has fallen. This should not be much of a surpise. In addition to the confusion, the Surface tablet is hardware/software combination without a compelling use case. It costs as much as an iPad, has hardly any apps and is, at least initially, confusing to use. "
http://blogs.computerworld.com/tablets/21504/how-far-has-microsoft-fallen
"The biggest difference is that Windows RT does not support "legacy" or "desktop" applications. "
Ja raju tilitys Microsoftin surkeasta tilanteesta tiivistyy:
"Bray's mistake is, to me, an indicator of just how far off the consumer radar Microsoft has fallen. This should not be much of a surpise. In addition to the confusion, the Surface tablet is hardware/software combination without a compelling use case. It costs as much as an iPad, has hardly any apps and is, at least initially, confusing to use. "
http://blogs.computerworld.com/tablets/21504/how-far-has-microsoft-fallen
Vastaukset 2
Vanhimmat
Luultavasti vain Microsoftin markkinointiosasta pitää Windows 8:sta ja nekin vain virkansa puolesta.
Michael Horowitzin asiallinen ja äärimmäisen kriittinen analyysi: Microsoft näytetään tapettavan kuin kerjäläinen.