NASA salailee

Onko hra Lear jo hoidossa?

Ei kai kukaan enää nykypäivänä voi uskoa tuollaiseen. Väitteet ovat aivan harhaisia.

Scott Carpenter:
"At no time, when the astronauts were in space were they alone: there was a constant surveillance by UFOs."

UFO Sightings by Astronauts
http://www.syti.net/UFOSightings.html

See The UFOs NASA Has Deleted: UFO Photos Leaked
http://www.disclose.tv/news/See_The_UFOs_NASA_Has_Deleted_UFO_Photos_Leaked_Out_Of_NASAJSC_100_Clear_In_High_Detail/113313

Did NASA delete evidence of UFOs from its photo archive?
http://io9.com/5977193/did-nasa-delete-evidence-of-ufos-from-its-photo-archive

http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/SearchPhotos/photo.pl?mission=STS088&roll=724&frame=66

NASA Deletes UFO Out Of Photo and Then Edits Others, Jan 2015, UFO Sighting News.
http://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/2015/01/nasa-deletes-ufo-out-of-photo-and-then.html


-

NASA forced to deny UFO claims after 'alien spacecraft' is spotted orbiting asteroid
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/nasa-forced-deny-ufo-claims-5077161

Watch mystery 'flying disc' UFO spotted on NASA space webcam seconds before video stopped working
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/watch-mystery-flying-disc-ufo-4048138

Nasa accused of cutting live ISS feed as 'UFOs' hover in sight: Conspiracy theorists claim space agency is hiding alien life
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2920426/Nasa-cuts-live-ISS-video-feed-UFO-hovers-sight-Conspiracy-theorists-claim-space-agency-hiding-alien-life.html

Proof Of Alien UFO Cover-up? NASA Accused Of Deleting Earth Orbiting UFO From Apollo Mission Space Photo
http://www.inquisitr.com/1777297/proof-of-alien-ufo-cover-up-nasa-accused-of-deleting-earth-orbiting-ufo-from-apollo-mission-space-photo/

YouTube user says he has proof of NASA covering up evidence of aliens after he found a 'UFO hovering near the Sun'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2142570/YouTube-user-accuses-NASA-coverup-finds-UFO-hovering-near-Sun.html

NASA Helioviewer: Giant Cigar-Shaped UFO Spotted Moving Close To The Speed Of Light?
http://www.inquisitr.com/1774127/nasa-helioviewer-giant-cigar-shaped-ufo-spotted-moving-close-to-the-speed-of-light-photos/

New UFO Sighted In NASA Space Station Video, 3rd UFO Seen Hovering Around ISS In Four Months
http://www.inquisitr.com/1725477/ufo-sighted-in-nasa-video/

UFO sighting as NASA astronauts walk across ISS
http://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/523121/UFO-sighting-NASA-International-Space-Station-ISS-alien

NASA Astronaut Sees 'UFO' Near Space Station
http://www.space.com/22431-nasa-astronaut-sees-ufo-near-space-station-video.html

The Dark Side of the Moon: 40 years after moon landing the doubts persist Was it all a hoax?
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/the-dark-side-of-the-moon-40-years-377044

-

Totuus nousee esiin.

Avaruusromulle olisi korkea aika tehdä jotain.

Aloittaja on kannanotossaan turhan varovainen.
Koko universumin alueella alkuräjähdyksen ajoista asti kehitetty kaikkinainen tietämys, niin tekninen, taloudellinen kuin kulttuuriinkin liittyvä, on NASAn käytettävissä. On siinä ko. organisaatiolla valtava taakka sen salassapidossa!
Lisäksi on alituinen vaara, että jokin vieraan galaksin avaruusrotu vuotaa huolimattomuuttaan julkisuuteen salaista universaalista informaatiota !

ai vai salailee vaan--- ja niiku kerro ees kaikkee. Ne kusettaa ja kerro paskaakaan mistään. Tossa.

Kuvaannollisesti voidaan sanoa, että NASA on universumin napa, jonka ympärillä kosmoksen ufoliikenne suuren salaisuuden verhoamana pyörii.

Organisaatioiden sisältä tulevat paljastukset toimii, huutakaa vaatimuksia, se ei kukku toimi se.

Gary McKinnon hakkeroi Nasan ja Pentagonin tietokoneet :

"As part of the Disclosure Project, Donna Hare - a NASA photographic scientist who had a Top Secret clearance and was in Building 8 at Johnson Space Center - she says in her testimony that one of her colleagues who was doing some photographic work invited her over to look at it. And she saw high-res satellite images of half a k[ilometer] above the treetops - I think it was like a white disk.

And she at first thought: Oh; it's a blob in the emulsion, you know, some kind of fault with the photographic process. And he said: well, look, you know, blobs in the emulsion don't have perfectly formed shadows going in the same direction as the trees? Etcetera, etcetera. All the detail was there. And she basically was saying that they had this whole base in Building 8 for airbrushing out UFOs on a regular basis, because they then sell on their images to universities and the like.

And having been all over other NASA installations already - I asumed the blank password scanning method will work the same at Johnson Space Center - and it did. Once I was in there, I used various network commands to strip out the machines that were in Building 8. And I got on to those. And the very first one I was on literally had what she said. I can't remember if it was "Filtered" and "Raw", Processed" and "Unprocessed," but there were definitely folders whereby there was a transformation in the data taking place between one and the other.

These folders were full of images in a proprietary NASA format, or in a format I'd never seen before: no jpegs or gifs. They were also 200 to 300 megabytes in size. And being on a 56K dial-up modem, there was no way I was going to download that at five minutes per megabyte.

So what I did... The remote control program that gives you graphical control of the machine - I turned the resolution right down to, I think, 4-bit color and then on the desktop on the NASA machine, navigated to the folder, double-clicked on the first image. The application launches. The image comes up on the screen, but it's still very, very slow.

And what I saw, or was hoping to see, was what she was describing as a saucer, very definite imagery. And what instead I saw I assume was the Earth. This was in shades of gray. You had the Earth's hemisphere taking up about 2/3 of the screen and then halfway between the top of the hemisphere and the bottom of the picture there was a classic sort of cigar-shaped object, but with golf-ball domes, geodesic domes, above, below, and this side [gesturing to the right], and I assume the other side as well. It had very slightly flattened cigar ends. No seams. No rivets. No telemetry antennae or anything like that. It looked... it just had a feeling of not being man-made. There was none of the signs of human manufacturing."

-
"GM: There was an Excel spreadsheet and the title was "Non-Terrestrial Officers," and it had names, ranks... it wasn't a long list; it didn't fill the whole screen, I don't think.

KC: Could you just generally say how many? I mean, if you were to guess, are we talking 20, 50?

GM: 20, maybe 30.

KC: Did you notice if they were male or female, by chance?

GM: That I can't remember.

KC: OK. First names and last names?

GM: [pauses thoughtfully] Definitely ranks, but nothing to say Army captain, or Navy captain, or US Air Force captain.

KC: Ah, so the designation wasn't there as far as which organization they worked for?

GM: Yeah. I mean, that was the title "Non-Terrestrial Officers", and obviously it's not little green men. So I was thinking: What force is this? And that phrase is nowhere to be found on the web or in official Army documentation or anything. And the other thing was a list of ship-to-ship and fleet-to-fleet transfers - and bear in mind fleet-to-fleet, that means multiple ships - movement of materials. And these ships weren't, you know, US Navy ships. Again, I don't remember any of the names, but I remember at the time looking and trying to match up the names, and there wasn't anything that matched.

KC: So, now, this theoretically would have been pretty top secret information if indeed non-terrestrial is what it sounds to be, which is off-world, right?

GM: Yeah. I mean, I gleaned from that information... What I surmised is that an off-planet Space Marines is being formed. And if you actually look at DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, literature at the moment and in the last few years, a lot of government and space command stuff is all about space dominance. It is really, you know, the final frontier. Yeah, so I think it's natural for them to want to control space and to be developing a space-going force in secret. But I think most likely using technology reverse-engineered from ETs. "
-
http://projectcamelot.org/gary_mckinnon.html

On tämä saa´tanallista !
Antigravitaatio, saasteettoman ja loppumattoman, ufojen jo aikojen alusta hyödyntämän energian hyväksikäytön avaimet ovat NASAn, CIAn ja FBIn hallussa, ja me täällä Telluksella poltamme öljyä ja kivihiiltä ehtyviä luonnonvarojamme näin tuhlaten, ja valkoselkätikan pesimäalueita kaventaen.

Ja kaikesta tästä kärsimme vain älyttömän salailun takia !
On se niin kerpeleen VÄÄRIN !

Salailua kyllä on ja monelaista, mutta onko joidenkin salaisuuksien esirippua alettu kuitenkin jo raottaa?

Muutama vuosi sitten julkaistiin uutisjuttuja ja videoita suomessakin oudoista kohteista lähellä aurinkoa. Aurinkoon mahtuu noin 1 300 000 maapalloa ja ilmeisesti nuo kohteet ovat maapalloa huomattavastikin suurempia.

Seuraavalla videolla on tarkempaa kuvaa ja analyysia.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KO-l2JCPfy8

Kuvat julkaistiin muistaakseni NASAn toimesta. Oliko näiden kuvien julkaisulla jokin tarkoitus (myös muita kuvia on julkaistu oudoista kohteista auringon lähellä)? Oliko tarkoitus vihjata suurelle yleisölle jotain ympäröivästä kosmoksesta ja et-elämästä?

Kosmiset asiat ovat isoja ja usein ihmismielelle käsittämättömiä. Todella korkeasti kehittyneistä et-sivilisaatioista yleisesti saatavilla olevaa tietoa ei ole lainkaan. Onko olemassa jopa sellaisiakin et-olentoja, joilla on kyky rakentaa tähtiä ja aurinkokuntia Korkeampien Voimien ohjauksessa? Sekin on mahdollista, että noin suuret alukset
kuuluvat jo Taivashallinnon suoraan alaisuuteen, eli eivät siten olisikaan varsinaisia et-olentoja (Enkeleitä, Elohimeja yms).

Mielestäni se on hieman liian yksinkertainen ja helppo selitys, kun todetaan, että "Jumala loi maan ja taivaat", siis mm. maapallon ja auringon. Paavikin hiljattain totesi, että Jumala ei ole taikuri ("God is not a divine being or a magician, but the Creator who brought everything to life...") viitaten sanoilaan ilmeisesti siihenkin, että monet luomisprosessit ovat monimutkaisia ja toimijoita luomisprosesseissa voi olla runsaastikin, vaikka kaiken lähde onkin yksi korkein Jumala/Alkulähde.

John Lear:

"Here’s the spaceport on the far side of the Moon. And I can just show you the NASA book with the NASA photographs and you can just take your own magnifying glass and see that spaceport.

There’s no doubt about it. And you know why? Because the photo was taken in ’68, and NASA didn’t get serious about airbrushing until 1970. So I bought all those pre-1970 NASA photos, um... books, because they hadn’t developed their technique to airbrush... "
-
"The reason people have trouble with an atmosphere on the Moon is, to have an atmosphere, you have to have gravity. And people think that it’s one-sixth gravity. And they’ve been sold that over the years.

SOMEBODY has had an agenda here so that we DON’T think that there’s any gravity on the Moon, but there is. And, the way it can be proven is by using the Bullialdus/Newton Law of Inverse-Square, which takes the size of the planets - the diameter of the planets - and the neutral point. The neutral point is that point between the Earth and the Moon where the gravity of the Earth exactly meets the gravity of the Moon.

Now, NASA has traditionally told us that that’s 24,000 miles. And, if you work out the inverse-square law with 24,000 miles, the Moon does have one-sixth gravity. But, the fact is, the neutral point is at 43,495 miles. How do we know that? We know that because Wernher von Braun told us that in 1968. We know that because, in two of the books of Apollo, including Apollo 17 - and there was another Apollo mission - they specifically told, you know, they specifically said: Here we are at 39,000 miles and at the neutral point.

So, we KNOW that it’s between 39,000 and 43,000 miles. And either one of those would work out to be about 60–64% gravity of Earth. So, having 64% of gravity of Earth, it CAN hold an atmosphere. "

-
"Here’s what Aldrin says when he’s asked: How did it really feel to be on the Moon?

[reading] And he bristles. Quote: For Christ sake, I don’t know! I just don’t know! I have been frustrated since the day I left the Moon by that question. "
-
"J: This is a picture of the Moon. And this was taken by Lick Observatory. And in any picture of the Moon you see - any picture from way back when, up until now - there’s a very bright spot up here which is called “Aristarchus.” If you ask NASA, or anything about it, they just say: It’s incredibly white. We don’t know what’s there or why it’s like that.

But, in fact, last summer we had an astronomer over in England take a picture and this shows it.
We found a - what we assume is a fission reactor - 29 miles in diameter. You can see the dome, there. [holds up photo of Moon showing reactor.] "

-

"J: He very well could have been. There’s some people that have disappeared I have some questions about. And the number one guy is Bob Nathan. Now, Bob Nathan was head of JPL’s Viking imaging. VERY well known... always accessible to the public.

Bob Lazar and I went down to see him PERSONALLY to ask him a question about Mars. We got badges. We were admitted personally. He told us everything he knew. You know, he was easily accessible. Now, you Google him on the... you Google him, and there’s no record of the guy!

J: It’s like you go to Wikipedia and look for John Lear... He does not exist. And if you look into the records on Wikipedia, the only thing that’s said: No substantiation for anything he claimed. And that’s it on Wikipedia. Now, you can find Bob Lazar, Bill Lear, you know, the Man on the Moon, Howard Menger, everybody else, but you can’t find John Lear on Wikipedia.

K: So Bob Nathan has disappeared, as far as you know?

J: As far as Google. Yeah, I can’t find him. And, the reason I looked for him was because I was telling the story of when Bob and I went down to JPL. The reason we went down there is, Bob just got out of S-4. At S-4 he was shown a picture of what they call “Cydonia.” And there’s pyramids there and “the Face” on Mars. He was shown very clear pictures. And on the pyramids there was no doubt he could see doors, windows, handles, door handles, everything.

J: I mean, it was a place where somebody lived. So, our question was to Bob Nathan: Were there any other pictures taken, other than the two that Hoagland and DiPietro put in their book?

And he said: No, not that we know of.

And so then we said: Well, you know, these pictures were taken at a very low altitude. Was Viking ever taken lower than the pictures that Hoagland and DiPietro have?

And Nathan said: Yes, but we didn’t take any pictures from that lower altitude. "

nyt viiraa... pikkusen ainaskiin tai tietää jostain ylemmästä fyssiikasta 0.0

K: Okay, and tell us something about the glass structures that Hoagland is talking about because he calls it “glass.” He says it’s a special kind of glass, but do you agree with him?

J: No.

K: Okay, and why not?

J: Because he’s talking about, I think, the Apollo 14 pictures and his thrust is those glass structures are domes.

K: Right.

J: And those domes are what contain the air. No. The air... it’s a thin atmosphere but as you know, according to Boyle’s Law, in an atmosphere, the lower it is, the thicker it is, so if you have... And I had some wonderful drawings I posted but I don’t see them here. As a matter of fact, I’m going to try and find them so that you can take a picture of them because they draw EXACTLY what I’m talking about.

The air settles into the craters and if you’re in the crater, you can breathe fine. If you get out of the crater it takes a little longer. But basically, the civilization of the Moon starts back at Newton. Somebody has influenced our thought about the Moon since the beginning of our thinking about anything.

Newton, for instance, he started to venture and say, you know, that there might be more mass on the Moon. And, that’s brought out in his three books now called Principia.

Shortly after Newton died, somebody modified his thoughts to make what is called the Newton Law of Universal Gravitation which is:


F = [G m1m2] / r2


...and he didn’t come up with that. That was somebody else. He didn’t think that you had to specify what the mass was.


But, anyway, in 1856 there was a Danish mathematician and astronomer named Peter Andreas Hansen. And he proposed ... He had been researching the times and the periods of Saturn and several other things. He was VERY knowledgeable. But, anyway, he was also looking at the Moon, and he had found something strange about the Moon - that when you did the predictions on where the Moon should be for a particular time, for its particular mass, it was not there.

And, so in 1856, he went before the Royal Society - Astronomical Society - and proposed that there was a “bump” on the far side of the Moon that was actually... The center of gravity was actually placed 57 kilometers farther out in space than had been generally realized. And, for that reason, he thought that there might be atmosphere on the far side. And, with this atmosphere, he thought there might be plants, vegetables, and maybe even human life.

So, he was regarded as a hero and a very interesting guy up until 1870, when a guy named Simon Newcomb came to Paris and told everybody that Peter Andreas Hansen was full of beans, there was not a shred of truth to it, and that, even if he was right about these different times, that it wouldn’t make any difference. So guess who Simon Newcomb was. He was a Rear Admiral in the US Navy and Head of the US Naval Observatory in Washington, DC.

The reason people have trouble with an atmosphere on the Moon is, to have an atmosphere, you have to have gravity. And people think that it’s one-sixth gravity. And they’ve been sold that over the years.

SOMEBODY has had an agenda here so that we DON’T think that there’s any gravity on the Moon, but there is. And, the way it can be proven is by using the Bullialdus/Newton Law of Inverse-Square, which takes the size of the planets - the diameter of the planets - and the neutral point. The neutral point is that point between the Earth and the Moon where the gravity of the Earth exactly meets the gravity of the Moon.

Now, NASA has traditionally told us that that’s 24,000 miles. And, if you work out the inverse-square law with 24,000 miles, the Moon does have one-sixth gravity. But, the fact is, the neutral point is at 43,495 miles. How do we know that? We know that because Wernher von Braun told us that in 1968. We know that because, in two of the books of Apollo, including Apollo 17 - and there was another Apollo mission - they specifically told, you know, they specifically said: Here we are at 39,000 miles and at the neutral point.

So, we KNOW that it’s between 39,000 and 43,000 miles. And either one of those would work out to be about 60–64% gravity of Earth. So, having 64% of gravity of Earth, it CAN hold an atmosphere.

And, well, people say: Well, if it has any atmosphere, how does it keep the atmosphere? Well, the same way the Earth does. They have forests, meadows, lakes, rivers, people, civilizations, and it’s on a band of the Moon that’s just beyond where we can see. And I have a picture here but I can’t find it. But it’s on a band. And that’s the same band that both Menger and Adamski visited.


http://projectcamelot.org/john_lear.html

tapista asti ollu ilmiselväää vai vaan katellu tota YouTuubbia hetken?

Mars -mönkijän osia on puhdistettu/korjailtu käsin (laitteen ollessa jo marsissa):


"white arrow points to a small area where something has apparently touched the panel, removing the thin layer of dust and exposing the metal underneath. Also visible is the hinge mechanism (red arrows) showing the hinge plates and actuator completely cleaned of dust. Also - there is evidence that the top hinge plate may have recently been attached to this dirty solar panel."


http://www.thelivingmoon.com/47ted_twietmeyer/01archives/Mars_Mission_Is_It_Real.htm


-


Astronauttien kommentteja:

"It started in World War 2, when the government didn't want people to know about UFO reports in case they panicked," said Cooper. "They would have been fearful it was superior enemy technology that we had no defense against."


"America has a right to know!" Astronaut Gordon Cooper"

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/47john_lear/02files/Astronaut_Quotes.html