JACKSON'S 'PHONE SEX' WITNESS
A British businessman MICHAEL JACKSON befriended more than 20 years ago is set to be the key witness in the singer's child molestation trial - because he claims the THRILLER star had phone sex with him.
TERRY GEORGE, 40, will tell the Santa Barbara court in California that Jackson made an explicit reference to fondling himself during a telephone chat - after the two became friends and enjoyed long-distance calls following Jackson's 1979 British tour.
George has agreed to take to the stand on 31 January (05) because he believes his experiences with the superstar support the allegations against Jackson.
George says, "I can believe that the latest allegations are true because of what happened to me. It if it hadn't been for that phone call I would never have believed it was possible.
Kommentti:
Siis eikös tää kundi olle se tyyppi siitä aiemmin esitetystä MJ-dokumentista, jossa haastateltiin Uri Gelleriä ja Jackon isää? "Dokumentti" oli aika hupaisa... Yksi tyyppi kertoi saaneensa Jackolta lapsena haastattelun nauhalle? Se väitti myös että myöhemmin Jacko runkkasi kun se puhui sen kanssa puhelimessa...
Tuo sälli on kyllä pelkkä luonne todistaja, eikä liity itse juttuun. Eikös sen pitänyt olla MJ-fani? Miten se todistaa puheensa, vai onko sillä se väitetty runkkaaminenkin nauhalla? Nolo homma kuitenkin. Nyt taitaa kaikki mahdollinen paska lentää Jackon päälle...
A British businessman MICHAEL JACKSON befriended more than 20 years ago is set to be the key witness in the singer's child molestation trial - because he claims the THRILLER star had phone sex with him.
TERRY GEORGE, 40, will tell the Santa Barbara court in California that Jackson made an explicit reference to fondling himself during a telephone chat - after the two became friends and enjoyed long-distance calls following Jackson's 1979 British tour.
George has agreed to take to the stand on 31 January (05) because he believes his experiences with the superstar support the allegations against Jackson.
George says, "I can believe that the latest allegations are true because of what happened to me. It if it hadn't been for that phone call I would never have believed it was possible.
Kommentti:
Siis eikös tää kundi olle se tyyppi siitä aiemmin esitetystä MJ-dokumentista, jossa haastateltiin Uri Gelleriä ja Jackon isää? "Dokumentti" oli aika hupaisa... Yksi tyyppi kertoi saaneensa Jackolta lapsena haastattelun nauhalle? Se väitti myös että myöhemmin Jacko runkkasi kun se puhui sen kanssa puhelimessa...
Tuo sälli on kyllä pelkkä luonne todistaja, eikä liity itse juttuun. Eikös sen pitänyt olla MJ-fani? Miten se todistaa puheensa, vai onko sillä se väitetty runkkaaminenkin nauhalla? Nolo homma kuitenkin. Nyt taitaa kaikki mahdollinen paska lentää Jackon päälle...
Vastaukset 2
Vanhimmat
I gave no interview!
Despite not having given an interview to the newspapers since 1993, the following ‘exclusives' appeared on the front pages of the Sunday People and the Sunday Star on the 23rd November 2003. I had been offered a large sum of money to give my story, but had declined. How therefore are they able to claim that this story is an ‘exclusive'? Is it because they both came out at the same time? Is it because they re-hashed an article which was written ten years ago? Or was it an exclusive because they took images and mis-quoted the Louis Theroux documentary? It is a no-win situation - when the papers want to get their story, they will print it with or without your co-operation. "I did not sell or give an interview to the Sunday People or the Sunday Star".
http://www.terrygeorge.co.uk/home/?f=13/Michael-Jackson-and-Terry-George.html
Todella outo tapaus tämä Terry George, siinä dokkarissahan se vielä selitti että haluaisi olla vielä jonain päivänä MJ:n ystävä!
Tämmöistä on myös selvinnyt hänestä:
"Basically, Terry George appears to have a fixation with celebrities
in general which is obvious from his site which contains photos of
him with various different people he has 'met'. He interviewed
Michael and his brothers in '79 whilst they were on tour in the UK
and that was it. Apart from that he appears to have met MJ and
Paul McCartney at AIR studios and had his photo taken with them
in 1983. That is the extent of his knowing MJ and I doubt Michael
would even recognise his name.
As far as the the current legal proceedings are concerned there
is no way Terry George could be called by Sneddon. Combined
with the fact that George is a liar is the issue of his business
dealings. A UK news programme recently exposed George's
sex chat line company as being involved(knowingly or not)in
fronting illegal activity."