Kritiikkiä ukrainalaisten UAP-raportin johdosta

Nyt ovat jotkut tuon raportin kirjoittajien kolleegoista julkaisseet kritiikkiä tuon raportin johdosta. Kolleegat tuovat esille tiettyjä puutteita,kuten että raporrtista puuttuvat päivämäärät sekä että raporttia ei ole vertaisarvioitu:

For your information.

The mass media of Ukraine and the world reported that the scientists of the Main Astronomical Observatory of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (MAO NASU) observed the Unidentified Atmospheric Phenomena (UAP, which is introduced instead of the previously used term UFO).
Information about these observations were published by Dr. Sci. B.E. Zhilyaev (MAO NASU), V.N. Petukhov (MAO NASU), and V.M. Reshetnyk (Taras Shevchenko National Universty of Kyiv) on the website of the scientific archive (arxiv .org/abs/2208.11215v2, 10.48550/arXi v.2208.11215) as a pre-publication. The observations of UAPs were conducted in the test mode during scheduled meteor observations and their results were not discussed and reviewed at the MAO NASU.
Because this paper and results have drawn a lot of attention and sometimes an inadequate reaction, we organized the Astrophysical Seminar of the MAO NASU on September 15, 2022, where one of the authors, Dr.Sci. B.E. Zhilyaev, reported about these observations, interpretation, and argumentation why the observed events are precisely UAPs. The results of the discussion were reported at the meeting of the Scientific Council of the MAO NASU. Members of the Scientific Council came to the following conclusion: - Observations conducted by B.Yu. Zhilyaev and his colleagues are original. But the processing and interpretation of results were performed at an inappropriate scientific level and with significant errors in determining distances to the observed objects. Also, the dates of observations are absent in the paper; the authors do not indicate which events were observed simultaneously from two sites; the authors do not provide arguments that natural phenomena or artificial objects of earthly origin may be among the observed UAPs (meteors; objects carried by the wind over long distances; space debris, artifacts, etc.). - Instead of a critical analysis of observations (possible errors, adequacy of models, accuracy in post-processing), the authors postulate unreasonable conclusions about the characteristics of the observed objects as UAPs. - The Scientific Council of the MAO NAS of Ukraine requests the authors to update the version of the article on the website of the relevant archive with the mandatory replacement of the sentence "The Main Astronomical Observatory of NAS of Ukraine conducts an independent study of UAP ..." to the phrase "The authors of this paper conduct an independent study of UAP ...". - The Scientific Council of the MAO of NASU believes that the information published in the aforementioned paper by B.E. Zhilyaev et al. was premature and did not meet the professional requirements for publication of the results of scientific research.
S.G.Kravchuk, Ph.D. in Phys&Math., MAO NAS of Ukraine. Comments on the publication https://mao.kiev.ua/docs/science/review-1.pdf O.A.Veles, Ph.D. in Phys&;Math., MAO NAS of Ukraine.Comments on the publication https://mao.kiev.ua/docs/science/review-2.pdf

Igor Kalytyuk

Coordinator, ZOND

Kyiv, Ukraine