Hei,
Sain saittini nippa nappa siihen kuntoon, että nostelin sivut ylös perjantaina
, jossa on linkit bloggeriin.
Joku oli käynyut tyhjäämässä
jo bloggerit kaikki.
Onko neuvoja bloggerin luotettavuuden suhteen?
www.jannehuttunen.com (huom..sivujen teko kesken)
Monday, January 30, 2006
someone seemed to wiped off
all the messages...I wish luck to the process in honesty
-------------------corrections..to appendix
Mr. Huttunen believes that further the editing process and attempt topresent things from status point of view is likely to distort thetruthfulness of the message while editing meansa seek to impact over an audience.He says his attempt is not to be unrealistic or questionise those traditions
which gives too much shelter for a public speaker. Especially the onesattempting to use the protection of the tradition in a way the messages canget distorted or leave “holes” to the logic and speech. He gives an idealwhere a politic could be speak like a child to their parents while speakingto the voters not the vice versa like is the present idea suggest the safefather or mother figure who promises safetybut can deliver only an illusion, at best wrong analysis; leadingsuffering.The logic of the things are very simple but people are educated toappreciate the “parts*” of the messages. This again is a part of our naturalway to understand world by symbols.When we see a shiny car we get fooled because of the association process.We believe everything else in is in order as well. So we leave thingsunchecked and negotiate even with highly important matters trusting on anillusions which makes us unable to check things.The distortion brought in these pages are a proof to make a reader able touse one’s own brains. The lesson could not be more important.(* You can find articles appearing from these ideas during the spring 2006)Mr. Huttunen says that present development in human history, at least in hisown father country which he loves deeply because of the sacrifices given bythe kids of the past generations making our borders stable and ourfriendship lasting with Russia, however being progressive thinker is notallowed to appear too much while the traditions suggesting using a tie, suitand suitable manners in a speech suggest that it is either childish orinsane to deliver message with a total truthfulness. What Mr. Huttunen saysis that while there is nothing bad with a god fashion, dressing up, usingwell made suits however he suggest it is rather a childish and insane to",1]
);
//-->
which gives dignity and good manners but to hit to the those traditionswhich gives too much shelter for a public speaker. Especially the onesattempting to use the protection of the tradition in a way the messages canget distorted. He says appropriate idealto a politic would be speak like a child must speak to their parents while speakingto the voters not the vice versa like is the present idea. We seem to supply too often the safefather or mother figure to public. What can they do? Promises of a safetybut can they deliver more than an illusion? Mr. Huttunen says illusionary politics results at best wrong analysis; leading tosuffering of the party who was fooled. There is hardly a world which supports all living thing. This probably keeps still with politics.
The logic of the things in life are very simple. If we would go to a grass level we would see either we start to share more and want less or then we fight for our rights. However getting fooled is a thing leading to fight with our brains not needing a fists no more. He does not see his task is to teach poor people for a better liars but if he gains salary, why not.
To give an example of his training here is freebies: People are educated toappreciate the “parts*” of the messages. This again is a part of our naturalway to understand world by symbols. Such as astrology e.g.
In a material world this however works more motivating way. When we see a shiny car we get fooled because of the association process teached us by the traditions. Seeing a polished limo we believe everything else in is in order as well. So we leave thingsunchecked and negotiate even with highly important matters trusting on anillusions which makes us unable to check things.
He says that get skilled in lying distortion could be delievered to the messages. Producing more complexed advertisign and art are the piloting the culture towards a more rehearsed brains. Especially while the elders
are coming soon a real cost it might be good idea the elders could not follow too much what happens in a society.
(* You can find articles appearing from these ideas during the spring 2006)Mr. Huttunen says that present development in human history, at least in his own father country which he loves deeply, being progressive thinker is not allowed to appear too much. The traditions suggests using a tie, suit or at least suitable manners before one in a speech suggest that it is either childish to deliver message with a total truthfulness. What Mr. Huttunen saysis that while there is nothing bad with a good fashion, dressing up, usingwell made suits however he suggest it is rather a childish to accept a culture people are receptive to the information
carrying the means of a tradition. He suggest that traditions are overvaluedin a way that they will go in crisis because a good looking suit is not nomore attainable when even a lying idiots will wear them.3.1 c Communicating the finding to the rest of the worldMr. Huttunen says he delivered the sufficient amount of message to Finnishnews agency where it could have been potentially delivered further globallyif needed as well as he contacted by phone and with email messages toseveral big broadcast companies.He says he also from the first day wished to inform United States Governmentand Embassy in Finland. The instruction to progress with his offer hefriendly received by United States Embassy to continue with his offer he hadno full capacity to work with given guidelinesdue to a lack of a . He says that he did not take contact again to USEmbassy in Finland toask further help but after finding the FEMA Federal Emergency Agencyhandling over the civil crisis he attempted to make FEMA aware of theimportance of his findings. He says that simultaneously informing the NASAof the issue he was friendly guided to offer the workto the FEMA or equivalent organization. He says he attempt to sent his workin Excel Formatto the FEMA with as much sufficient explanations attached as situationbended over.He can not verified how the delivery of a Excel tables has succeeds and howhis insufficient language skills may have affected, but he attempts toprovide corrected knowledge withMr. Huttunen says he is reserved naturally to the idea that his finding arenot as strong that they could be as efficiently predict tornadoes, but heconvinces that they are meaningfuland should lead to a further research attempts if they are not “sufficient”to use in spring 2006, while forecasting tornadoes by his work, and using",1]
);
//-->
because of carrying the means of a tradition. He suggest that traditions will go crisis because a good looking suit is not nomore attainable when it is ruined in TV-commentaries.3.1 c. Communicating the finding to the rest of the worldMr. Huttunen says he delivered the sufficient amount of message to Finnish news agency where it could have been potentially delivered further globallyif needed. As well he contacted by phone and with email messages toseveral big broadcast companies.He says from the first day he also wished to inform United States Government and US Embassy in Finland of discovery and related offer. He received friendly instructions to progress with his offer by United States Embassy but he had no full capacity to work with given guidelinesdue to a lack of a finance . He says that while his costs accumulated he did not take contact again to US Embassy in Finland to ask further help but
tried to progress the issue through internet. He informed among others NASA who friendly suggested to submit his innovation through the Unsolicited Proposal Process or National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
However he admits following the procedures and bureacracy while waiting a red carpet was too much. He admits his childishness in this respect and says he never followed the none of the suggestions while expected the study verified just from the first proposal. He says that aftera years his ego did not fit into the procedures no more.
Mr.Huttunen says after finding
FEMA (Federal Emergency Agency) handling civil crisis. Mr. Huttunen says he attempted to make FEMA aware of the importance of his findings.
Of course he has had afford only through email messages. He also has send his work in Excel Formatto the FEMA with as much sufficient explanations attached as situationbended over. He attempted to send the excel tables with several different formats but can not verify how the delivery of a Excel tables has succeeded or how his insufficient language skills may have affected making things understood. He says he attempts to provide corrected knowledge to FEMA before april 2006, for the reason his
perspective would like to be used for observing the tornadoes on spring 2006.Mr. Huttunen says he is prepared his findings may not turn as strong as he expects, but he is convinced they are meaningful.He thinks investigation should lead to a further research at minimum. Mr. Huttunen is personally ready also to experiment his tornado forecasting project EWTAS (Early Warning Tornado Alarm System) to use in spring 2006 with a private or public sector partner and welcoming inquiries which would make the spring 2006 already acute.
He says he is naturally ready to apologize if he has mistakenly exaggerated themeaningfulness of the findings but does not belive he should be too afraid of it. At this point with positive results and without furtherresearches proving against he sees things are more likely
To support his perspective and information is sufficient to start experiment with tornadoes as soon aspossible.
Mr. Huttunen says he has attempted to communicate his finding for the press in the equivalent crisis area like in typhoon areas, In Asia but has not received so far any interest.
He says, while he has packed his claim to be a reasonable suggesting
Only the 50 years time-series might be valid only few years and not all the cycles might be correct, it is still a claim which goes obviously over the heel. He undertands that while someone would come and say” Hey I noticed a pink Elephant, but You know I did not see them a thousands but only a ten” is naturally leading things a bit too wildside.Predicting things and then claim an accuracy would mean a major change. It is a finding very hard to believe. While such a major discoveries are not of course impossible everyone knows such a thing have been so far extremely rare in the history in a science. However this of course should not make anyone unable to read the results.
posted by Sequences @ 8:52 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Sain saittini nippa nappa siihen kuntoon, että nostelin sivut ylös perjantaina
, jossa on linkit bloggeriin.
Joku oli käynyut tyhjäämässä
jo bloggerit kaikki.
Onko neuvoja bloggerin luotettavuuden suhteen?
www.jannehuttunen.com (huom..sivujen teko kesken)
Monday, January 30, 2006
someone seemed to wiped off
all the messages...I wish luck to the process in honesty
-------------------corrections..to appendix
Mr. Huttunen believes that further the editing process and attempt topresent things from status point of view is likely to distort thetruthfulness of the message while editing meansa seek to impact over an audience.He says his attempt is not to be unrealistic or questionise those traditions
which gives too much shelter for a public speaker. Especially the onesattempting to use the protection of the tradition in a way the messages canget distorted or leave “holes” to the logic and speech. He gives an idealwhere a politic could be speak like a child to their parents while speakingto the voters not the vice versa like is the present idea suggest the safefather or mother figure who promises safetybut can deliver only an illusion, at best wrong analysis; leadingsuffering.The logic of the things are very simple but people are educated toappreciate the “parts*” of the messages. This again is a part of our naturalway to understand world by symbols.When we see a shiny car we get fooled because of the association process.We believe everything else in is in order as well. So we leave thingsunchecked and negotiate even with highly important matters trusting on anillusions which makes us unable to check things.The distortion brought in these pages are a proof to make a reader able touse one’s own brains. The lesson could not be more important.(* You can find articles appearing from these ideas during the spring 2006)Mr. Huttunen says that present development in human history, at least in hisown father country which he loves deeply because of the sacrifices given bythe kids of the past generations making our borders stable and ourfriendship lasting with Russia, however being progressive thinker is notallowed to appear too much while the traditions suggesting using a tie, suitand suitable manners in a speech suggest that it is either childish orinsane to deliver message with a total truthfulness. What Mr. Huttunen saysis that while there is nothing bad with a god fashion, dressing up, usingwell made suits however he suggest it is rather a childish and insane to",1]
);
//-->
which gives dignity and good manners but to hit to the those traditionswhich gives too much shelter for a public speaker. Especially the onesattempting to use the protection of the tradition in a way the messages canget distorted. He says appropriate idealto a politic would be speak like a child must speak to their parents while speakingto the voters not the vice versa like is the present idea. We seem to supply too often the safefather or mother figure to public. What can they do? Promises of a safetybut can they deliver more than an illusion? Mr. Huttunen says illusionary politics results at best wrong analysis; leading tosuffering of the party who was fooled. There is hardly a world which supports all living thing. This probably keeps still with politics.
The logic of the things in life are very simple. If we would go to a grass level we would see either we start to share more and want less or then we fight for our rights. However getting fooled is a thing leading to fight with our brains not needing a fists no more. He does not see his task is to teach poor people for a better liars but if he gains salary, why not.
To give an example of his training here is freebies: People are educated toappreciate the “parts*” of the messages. This again is a part of our naturalway to understand world by symbols. Such as astrology e.g.
In a material world this however works more motivating way. When we see a shiny car we get fooled because of the association process teached us by the traditions. Seeing a polished limo we believe everything else in is in order as well. So we leave thingsunchecked and negotiate even with highly important matters trusting on anillusions which makes us unable to check things.
He says that get skilled in lying distortion could be delievered to the messages. Producing more complexed advertisign and art are the piloting the culture towards a more rehearsed brains. Especially while the elders
are coming soon a real cost it might be good idea the elders could not follow too much what happens in a society.
(* You can find articles appearing from these ideas during the spring 2006)Mr. Huttunen says that present development in human history, at least in his own father country which he loves deeply, being progressive thinker is not allowed to appear too much. The traditions suggests using a tie, suit or at least suitable manners before one in a speech suggest that it is either childish to deliver message with a total truthfulness. What Mr. Huttunen saysis that while there is nothing bad with a good fashion, dressing up, usingwell made suits however he suggest it is rather a childish to accept a culture people are receptive to the information
carrying the means of a tradition. He suggest that traditions are overvaluedin a way that they will go in crisis because a good looking suit is not nomore attainable when even a lying idiots will wear them.3.1 c Communicating the finding to the rest of the worldMr. Huttunen says he delivered the sufficient amount of message to Finnishnews agency where it could have been potentially delivered further globallyif needed as well as he contacted by phone and with email messages toseveral big broadcast companies.He says he also from the first day wished to inform United States Governmentand Embassy in Finland. The instruction to progress with his offer hefriendly received by United States Embassy to continue with his offer he hadno full capacity to work with given guidelinesdue to a lack of a . He says that he did not take contact again to USEmbassy in Finland toask further help but after finding the FEMA Federal Emergency Agencyhandling over the civil crisis he attempted to make FEMA aware of theimportance of his findings. He says that simultaneously informing the NASAof the issue he was friendly guided to offer the workto the FEMA or equivalent organization. He says he attempt to sent his workin Excel Formatto the FEMA with as much sufficient explanations attached as situationbended over.He can not verified how the delivery of a Excel tables has succeeds and howhis insufficient language skills may have affected, but he attempts toprovide corrected knowledge withMr. Huttunen says he is reserved naturally to the idea that his finding arenot as strong that they could be as efficiently predict tornadoes, but heconvinces that they are meaningfuland should lead to a further research attempts if they are not “sufficient”to use in spring 2006, while forecasting tornadoes by his work, and using",1]
);
//-->
because of carrying the means of a tradition. He suggest that traditions will go crisis because a good looking suit is not nomore attainable when it is ruined in TV-commentaries.3.1 c. Communicating the finding to the rest of the worldMr. Huttunen says he delivered the sufficient amount of message to Finnish news agency where it could have been potentially delivered further globallyif needed. As well he contacted by phone and with email messages toseveral big broadcast companies.He says from the first day he also wished to inform United States Government and US Embassy in Finland of discovery and related offer. He received friendly instructions to progress with his offer by United States Embassy but he had no full capacity to work with given guidelinesdue to a lack of a finance . He says that while his costs accumulated he did not take contact again to US Embassy in Finland to ask further help but
tried to progress the issue through internet. He informed among others NASA who friendly suggested to submit his innovation through the Unsolicited Proposal Process or National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
However he admits following the procedures and bureacracy while waiting a red carpet was too much. He admits his childishness in this respect and says he never followed the none of the suggestions while expected the study verified just from the first proposal. He says that aftera years his ego did not fit into the procedures no more.
Mr.Huttunen says after finding
FEMA (Federal Emergency Agency) handling civil crisis. Mr. Huttunen says he attempted to make FEMA aware of the importance of his findings.
Of course he has had afford only through email messages. He also has send his work in Excel Formatto the FEMA with as much sufficient explanations attached as situationbended over. He attempted to send the excel tables with several different formats but can not verify how the delivery of a Excel tables has succeeded or how his insufficient language skills may have affected making things understood. He says he attempts to provide corrected knowledge to FEMA before april 2006, for the reason his
perspective would like to be used for observing the tornadoes on spring 2006.Mr. Huttunen says he is prepared his findings may not turn as strong as he expects, but he is convinced they are meaningful.He thinks investigation should lead to a further research at minimum. Mr. Huttunen is personally ready also to experiment his tornado forecasting project EWTAS (Early Warning Tornado Alarm System) to use in spring 2006 with a private or public sector partner and welcoming inquiries which would make the spring 2006 already acute.
He says he is naturally ready to apologize if he has mistakenly exaggerated themeaningfulness of the findings but does not belive he should be too afraid of it. At this point with positive results and without furtherresearches proving against he sees things are more likely
To support his perspective and information is sufficient to start experiment with tornadoes as soon aspossible.
Mr. Huttunen says he has attempted to communicate his finding for the press in the equivalent crisis area like in typhoon areas, In Asia but has not received so far any interest.
He says, while he has packed his claim to be a reasonable suggesting
Only the 50 years time-series might be valid only few years and not all the cycles might be correct, it is still a claim which goes obviously over the heel. He undertands that while someone would come and say” Hey I noticed a pink Elephant, but You know I did not see them a thousands but only a ten” is naturally leading things a bit too wildside.Predicting things and then claim an accuracy would mean a major change. It is a finding very hard to believe. While such a major discoveries are not of course impossible everyone knows such a thing have been so far extremely rare in the history in a science. However this of course should not make anyone unable to read the results.
posted by Sequences @ 8:52 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Vastaukset
Vanhimmat
Ei vielä vastauksia
Aloittaja odottaa vastauksia. Kerro oma näkemyksesi ensimmäisenä.