Kaspersky huono!

Retrospective / ProActive - Test November 2006 Copyright (c) by Andreas Clementi (www.av-comparatives.org) - Tested on Windows XP Professional SP2


Company AVIRA G DATA Security Alwil Software GriSoft Softwin Doctor Web Frisk Software F-Secure Kaspersky Labs McAfee ESET Norman ASA Symantec AEC VirusBlokAda
Product AntiVir PE Premium AntiVirusKit (AVK) Avast! Professional AVG Professional BitDefender Prof.+ Dr. Web F-Prot Anti-Virus F-Secure Anti-Virus Kaspersky AV McAfee VirusScan NOD32 Anti-Virus NormanVirusControl Norton Anti-Virus TrustPort AV WS VBA32 Workstation
Program version 7.01.01.02 16.0.7 (2006) 4.7.869 7.1.405 9.5 4.33.4.07270 3.16f 6.12.90 6.0.0.303 11.0.209 2.51.26 5.81 12.2.0.13 2.0.0.843 3.11.0
Engine / signature version 6.35.01.60 16.8976 / 16.5352 0631-3 268.10.7 / 411 7.08453 4.33.2.06080 3.16.13 6.11.11450 N/A 5100.0194 / 4823 1.1695 5.90.23 80807 N/A N/A
Number of virus records 477.718 unknown unknown unknown 458.019 134.337 313.508 unknown 213.193 203.043 unknown 416.586 72.713 unknown unknown

Certification level reached* ADVANCED+ ADVANCED+ STANDARD ADVANCED+ STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD ADVANCED+ ADVANCED STANDARD ADVANCED+ STANDARD

Number of false positives* few few few very few few many few few few very few few few none few many
On-demand scanning speed* fast slow average fast slow slow average slow average fast fast average fast slow slow
ProActive detection of "NEW" samples**
DOS malware 7 0 0% 3 43% 0 0% 0 0% 1 14% 0 0% 1 14% 2 29% 2 29% 0 0% 1 14% 0 0% 0 0% 1 14% 2 29%
Windows viruses 62 14 23% 20 32% 3 5% 0 0% 17 27% 15 24% 9 15% 9 15% 9 15% 14 23% 27 44% 5 8% 3 5% 19 31% 8 13%
Script malware 124 7 6% 35 28% 0 0% 7 6% 29 23% 31 25% 3 2% 5 4% 5 4% 33 27% 11 9% 4 3% 21 17% 32 26% 7 6%
Worms 1.031 317 31% 376 36% 54 5% 23 2% 371 36% 98 10% 56 5% 14 1% 13 1% 106 10% 242 23% 232 23% 43 4% 419 41% 160 16%
Backdoors 2.692 1.781 66% 1.406 52% 1.029 38% 204 8% 1.329 49% 1.349 50% 671 25% 665 25% 665 25% 803 30% 1.820 68% 783 29% 936 35% 1.456 54% 1.560 58%
Trojans 6.411 3.438 54% 2.603 41% 827 13% 74 1% 2.585 40% 2.061 32% 824 13% 53 1% 53 1% 851 13% 3.442 54% 1.109 17% 549 9% 2.871 45% 2.607 41%
other malware 162 56 35% 47 29% 10 6% 2 1% 46 28% 30 19% 4 2% 3 2% 3 2% 39 24% 28 17% 7 4% 25 15% 48 30% 17 10%
OtherOS malware 9 2 22% 0 0% 1 11% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 4 44% 2 22% 0 0% 1 11% 0 0% 0 0%
TOTAL 10.498 5.615 53% 4.490 43% 1.924 18% 310 3% 4.378 42% 3.584 34% 1.568 15% 751 7% 750 7% 1.850 18% 5.573 53% 2.140 20% 1.578 15% 4.846 46% 4.361 42%


It is forbidden to provide the tables or results in full or in parts on other sites! Please just refer a link to www.av-comparatives.org
Please read carefully also the test reports and the other documents on our website to understand how to interpret the results.

* = read the report for details ( ! )
** = new malware samples received during the 7th August and the 7th November that were new to all tested scanners
This test shows the pure proactive ON-DEMAND detection capability that the scanners had 3 months ago (7th August 2006) with best possible detection settings.
To determine how good a scanner is in detecting zoo-samples on-demand in general with updated signatures, have a look on our February and August tests.
In order to have the highest available protection and proactive detection capabilities, keep your Anti-Virus always up-to-date.
Detection failures in a retrospective test are not up for discussion. Products which cause many false alarms can only get the STANDARD award.
Please rely on the reached certification levels and NOT on the percentages.

http://keskustelu.suomi24.fi/show.fcgi?category=108&conference=4500000000000659&posting=22000000021774167