p a o
-don quote-
"The ZERO/REDUCED-Gravity Chamber described below has obvious
potential applications for Chemistry, Biology, Biophysics,
Biochemistry, Medical Research, etc., allowing experiments which
now can be done ONLY on the Space Shuttle or Station, AT GREAT
EXPENSE !
Gravity-NEUTRALIZING Air/Spacecraft
or ZERO/REDUCED-Gravity Chamber
NASA should build an experimental spacecraft based
on U.S. Patent #3,626,605, titled "METHOD AND APPARATUS
FOR GENERATING A SECONDARY GRAVITATIONAL FORCE FIELD",
awarded to Inventor Henry W. Wallace on Dec. 14, 1971.
[$3.00 per complete copy from U.S. Patent Office, 2021
Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202; correct 7-
digit patent number required. Or try getting it via
your local public or university library's inter-library
loan dept..]
In the patent, Figs. 7A and 7B are basically side
views of a gravity-NEUTRALIZING FLYING SAUCER, or, if
anchored to the ground, a ZERO-GRAVITY CHAMBER [which
could have MANY possible GROUND-level applications for
science, medicine, manufacturing, etc.]. Each oval
diagram shows a motor spinning a central disc at a very
high speed, about 28,000 RPM, and also rotating two
other discs sandwiched around the first disc, via gears,
at a much slower speed, perhaps 2,800 RPM, in the
opposite direction. The two outer discs have extensions
[counter-balanced via off-center axis] that, as they
rotate, alternately make contact with two wide
extensions from opposite walls of the spacecraft. The
central disc should have shallow spiral-shaped grooves
on both sides for air-bearings, to allow the needed very
close contact with the two outer discs.
I should clarify that each of the two outer discs
has ONLY ONE [counter-balanced] extension, each one
pointed opposite (180 degrees) the extension of the
other disc.
VERY CLOSE CONTACT must be made as the disc
extensions slide past the wall extensions in order to
conduct the "Kinemassic" Energy (term coined by the
Inventor) from the discs to the walls in an ALTERNATING
CIRCULATION.
The most important factor making it work is that
the discs, extensions, and outer walls of the spacecraft
MUST be made of any material(s) in which a very large
majority of the atoms are of isotopes having "HALF-
INTEGRAL ATOMIC SPINS", such as copper (3/2). All other
parts, etc., should have a minority of such atoms. [See
the appropriate column of the table of isotopes in the
latest edition of "The Handbook of Chemistry and
Physics."]
Experimenters should use one motor to spin the
center disc [Start small, such as only one or two feet
in diameter.], and a 2ND SEPARATE motor to rotate the
two outer discs, so their relative speeds can be varied
to establish the needed conditions for PROPULSION of the
spacecraft via "NEGATIVE WEIGHT" (with the spacecraft's
"Kinemassic" field seemingly PUSHING AGAINST the earth's
gravitational field, etc.).
If we have to put up a space station, establish
Moon bases, go to Mars, rendezvous with comets, etc.,
WHY DO IT THE HARD WAY?!
Your favorite university or research company could
make a BIG NAME for itself by making a small model of
this work.
For more information, answers to your questions,
etc., please consult my CITED SOURCES.
Robert E. McElwaine
B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC"
mielipiteitä ?
-don quote-
"The ZERO/REDUCED-Gravity Chamber described below has obvious
potential applications for Chemistry, Biology, Biophysics,
Biochemistry, Medical Research, etc., allowing experiments which
now can be done ONLY on the Space Shuttle or Station, AT GREAT
EXPENSE !
Gravity-NEUTRALIZING Air/Spacecraft
or ZERO/REDUCED-Gravity Chamber
NASA should build an experimental spacecraft based
on U.S. Patent #3,626,605, titled "METHOD AND APPARATUS
FOR GENERATING A SECONDARY GRAVITATIONAL FORCE FIELD",
awarded to Inventor Henry W. Wallace on Dec. 14, 1971.
[$3.00 per complete copy from U.S. Patent Office, 2021
Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202; correct 7-
digit patent number required. Or try getting it via
your local public or university library's inter-library
loan dept..]
In the patent, Figs. 7A and 7B are basically side
views of a gravity-NEUTRALIZING FLYING SAUCER, or, if
anchored to the ground, a ZERO-GRAVITY CHAMBER [which
could have MANY possible GROUND-level applications for
science, medicine, manufacturing, etc.]. Each oval
diagram shows a motor spinning a central disc at a very
high speed, about 28,000 RPM, and also rotating two
other discs sandwiched around the first disc, via gears,
at a much slower speed, perhaps 2,800 RPM, in the
opposite direction. The two outer discs have extensions
[counter-balanced via off-center axis] that, as they
rotate, alternately make contact with two wide
extensions from opposite walls of the spacecraft. The
central disc should have shallow spiral-shaped grooves
on both sides for air-bearings, to allow the needed very
close contact with the two outer discs.
I should clarify that each of the two outer discs
has ONLY ONE [counter-balanced] extension, each one
pointed opposite (180 degrees) the extension of the
other disc.
VERY CLOSE CONTACT must be made as the disc
extensions slide past the wall extensions in order to
conduct the "Kinemassic" Energy (term coined by the
Inventor) from the discs to the walls in an ALTERNATING
CIRCULATION.
The most important factor making it work is that
the discs, extensions, and outer walls of the spacecraft
MUST be made of any material(s) in which a very large
majority of the atoms are of isotopes having "HALF-
INTEGRAL ATOMIC SPINS", such as copper (3/2). All other
parts, etc., should have a minority of such atoms. [See
the appropriate column of the table of isotopes in the
latest edition of "The Handbook of Chemistry and
Physics."]
Experimenters should use one motor to spin the
center disc [Start small, such as only one or two feet
in diameter.], and a 2ND SEPARATE motor to rotate the
two outer discs, so their relative speeds can be varied
to establish the needed conditions for PROPULSION of the
spacecraft via "NEGATIVE WEIGHT" (with the spacecraft's
"Kinemassic" field seemingly PUSHING AGAINST the earth's
gravitational field, etc.).
If we have to put up a space station, establish
Moon bases, go to Mars, rendezvous with comets, etc.,
WHY DO IT THE HARD WAY?!
Your favorite university or research company could
make a BIG NAME for itself by making a small model of
this work.
For more information, answers to your questions,
etc., please consult my CITED SOURCES.
Robert E. McElwaine
B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC"
mielipiteitä ?
Vastaukset 6
Vanhimmat
Voe voe, kun en ossoo tuota enklantia voesko joku suomentoo..
Jos vuonna 1971 olisi patentoitu toimiva antigravitaatiolaite, niin johan noita olisi käytössä pilvin pimein. Varsinkin kun se on vielä noinkin yksinkertainen valmistaa.
Täyttä puppuahan tuo on.
Eipä se ole ensimmäinen patentoitu humpuukiviritys ja ei varmasti viimeinenkään.
"Täyttä puppuahan tuo on."
Varaktori, mielestäni järki jättää kun sanot "niin johan noita olisi käytössä pilvin pimein."
Esimerkiksi syöpään on olemassa nykyään ainakin 7 eri parannuskeinoa, mutta oletko kuullut tästä asiasta ns.kotrolloidun "vapaan" lehdistön kautta ?
Postasin tuon tänne koska siinä puhuttiin kuparista. Podklentow(meniköhän se nimi oikein;) Teki kokeita mm. 40000rpm pyörivällä renkaalla ja paperit puhuvat 4% "painon pudotuksesta" tämä Tampereelta...
Jos jotakuta kiinnostaa niin mm Victor Schauberg:n kokeet ennen ww2 saivat aikaan runsaasti kiinnostusta mm. Vrill ja Thule "seuroissa"
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_ufoaleman.htm
Mitkähän nuo 7 syövän parannuskeinoa sitten ovat? Entä kuka tuota "vapaata" lehdistöä sitten kontrolloi ja miten?
Onhan tuo perusteorialtaan ihan järkeenkäypä asia.
Jos aiheutetaan toinen keinotekoinen painovoimakenttä kappaleen yläpuolelle, se kumoaa maan painovoimakentän ja kappale on näennäisesti painoton.
Vinhasti pyöriviä kiekkoja ja mitä kaikkea tuossa onkaan, mutta moni tiedemies ja fyysikko uskoo laitteen toimivuuteen. Enkä ollenkaan epäile, etteikö ko laitetta ole jo jossakin laboratoriossa hissukseen rakennettu ja testattukin.
Ufoksi laitteesta on kuitenkin vielä pitkä matka, tämä härveli nimittäin tekee painovoimakentän alleen tai kammioon ja siinä on sitten kohta johon viety kappale on laitteen aiheuttaman painovoimakentän ja maan painovoimakentän välissä, siis laite kohottaa ja maa vetää. => kappale painoton =)
Samoja kiksejä saa tippuvassa lentokoneessa ja suurissa vuoristoradoissa..
Tottakai tuosta eteenpäin johdattelemalla voisi ajatella päästävän laitteeseen jonka teho kentän laajuuden ja voiman kohdalla olisi jo niin suuri, että se voisi singota itsensä yläpuolelle suuremman kentän, kuin siihen kohdistuva maan vetovoima on, mutta kyllä siihen asiaan vastaus löytyy Suprapuolelta helpommin, silloin ei kuluteta energiaa, eikä laitteen massa paisu tehon kasvaessa.. Avaruusasemien kasvaessa tuollaisia tiloja tutkimukseen ja lääketieteelle alkaa olla suurissa määrin tarjolla muutenkin.
Aiheesta löytyi tuollainen laajempi kooste kuvien kanssa:
http://www.rexresearch.com/wallace/wallace.htm
Kiitos wallacesta.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1518879/posts?page=78
lainaus -TR-B3 Astra-
___________________________________
To: LibWhacker
Here is one story on the net.
Copyright 1998 by Fouche Media AssociatesFrom
A friend said, he would never forget the sight of the alien looking TR-3B based at Papoose. The pitch black, triangular shaped TR-3B was rarely mentioned--and then, only in hushed whispers--at the Groom Lake facility where he worked. The craft had flown over the Groom Lake runway in complete silence and magically stopped above Area S-4. It hovered silently in the same position, for some 10 minutes, before gently settling vertically to the tarmac. At times a corona of silver blue light glowed around the circumference of the massive TR-3B. The operational model is 600 feet across.
The TR-3B is Code named Astra.
The tactical reconnaissance TR-3B first operational flight was in the early 90s. The triangular shaped nuclear powered aerospace platform was developed under the Top Secret, Aurora Program with SDI and black budget monies. At least 3 of the billion dollar plus TR-3Bs were flying by 1994. The Aurora is the most classified aerospace development program in existence. The TR-3B is the most exotic vehicle created by the Aurora Program. It is funded and operationally tasked by the National Reconnaissance Office, the NSA, and the CIA. The TR-3B flying triangle is not fiction and was built with technology available in the mid 80s.Not every UFO spotted is one of theirs.
The TR-3B vehicle’s outer coating is reactive to electricalRadar stimulation and can change reflectiveness, radar absorptiveness,and color. This polymer skin, when used in conjunction with the TR-3Bs Electronic Counter Measures and, ECCM, can make the vehicle look like a small aircraft, or a flying cylinder--or even trick radar receivers into falsely detecting a variety of aircraft, no aircraft, or several aircraft at various locations.A circular, plasma filled accelerator ring called the Magnetic Field Disrupter, surrounds the rotatable crew
compartment and is far ahead of any imaginable technology.
Sandia and Livermore laboratories developed the reverse
engineered MFD technology. The government will go to any lengths to protect this technology. The plasma, mercury based, is pressurized at 250,000 atmospheres at a temperature of 150 degrees Kelvin and accelerated to 50,000 rpm to create a super-conductive plasma with the resulting gravity disruption. The MFD generates a magnetic vortex field, which disrupts or neutralizes the effects of gravity on mass within proximity, by 89 percent. Do not misunderstand. This is not antigravity. Anti-gravity provides a repulsive force that can be used for propulsion. The MFD creates a disruption of the Earth's gravitational field upon the mass within the circular accelerator. The mass of the circular accelerator and all mass within the accelerator, such as the crew capsule, avionics, MFD systems, fuels, crew environmental systems, and the nuclear reactor, are reduced by 89%.This causes the effect of making the vehicle extremely light and able to outperform and outmaneuver any craft yet constructed--except, of course, those UFOs we did not build.
The TR-3B is a high altitude, stealth, reconnaissance platform with an indefinite loiter time. Once you get it up there at speed, it doesn’t take much propulsion to maintain altitude.At Groom Lake their have been whispered rumours of a new element that acts as a catalyst to the plasma.With the vehicle mass reduced by 89%, the craft can travel at Mach 9, vertically or horizontally. My sources say the performance is limited only the stresses that the human pilots can endure. Which is a lot, really, considering along with the 89% reduction in mass, the G forces are also reduced by 89%.
The TR-3Bs propulsion is provided by 3 multimode thrusters mounted at each bottom corner of the triangular platform. The TR-3 is a sub-Mach 9 vehicle until it reaches altitudes above l20,000 feet--then God knows how fast it can go!The 3 multimode rocket engines mounted under each corner of the craft use hydrogen or methane and oxygen as a propellent.In a liquid oxygen/hydrogen rocket system, 85% of the propellent mass is oxygen. The nuclear thermal rocket engine uses a hydrogen propellent, augmented with oxygen for additional thrust. The reactor heats the liquid hydrogen and injects liquid oxygen in the supersonic nozzle, so that the hydrogen burns concurrently in the liquid oxygen afterburner.The multimode propulsion system can; operate in the atmosphere, with thrust provided by the nuclear reactor, in the upper atmosphere, with hydrogen propulsion, and in orbit, with the combined hydrogen\ oxygen propulsion.
What you have to remember is, that the 3 rocket engines only have to propel 11 percent of the mass of the Top Secret TR-3B. The engines are reportedly built by Rockwell.Many sightings of triangular UFOs are not alien vehicles but the top secret TR-3B. The NSA, NRO, CIA, and USAF have been playing a shell game with aircraft nomenclature - creating the TR-3, modified to the TR-3A, the TR-3B, and the Teir 2, 3, and 4, with suffixes like Plus or Minus added on to confuse further the fact that each of these designators is a different aircraft and not the same aerospace vehicle. A TR-3B is as different from a TR-3A as a banana is from a grape. Some of these vehicles are manned and others are unmanned.
________________________________________