http://www.noperformancetax.org/
"For more than 80 years, radio and the recording industry have enjoyed a mutually beneficial relationship: free play for free promotion. And it works. It’s a relationship that has sustained businesses on both sides."
Ymmärsinkö nyt oikein että ameriikassa ei radioasemien tähän asti/jatkossakaan tarvitse maksaa mitään siitä että soittavat musiikkia?
BTW; kuulin mainoksen tuosta sivustosta kun kuuntelin Kalifornialaisen KIIS FMn nettiradiota.
"For more than 80 years, radio and the recording industry have enjoyed a mutually beneficial relationship: free play for free promotion. And it works. It’s a relationship that has sustained businesses on both sides."
Ymmärsinkö nyt oikein että ameriikassa ei radioasemien tähän asti/jatkossakaan tarvitse maksaa mitään siitä että soittavat musiikkia?
BTW; kuulin mainoksen tuosta sivustosta kun kuuntelin Kalifornialaisen KIIS FMn nettiradiota.
Vastaukset 1
Vanhimmat
http://www.examiner.com/x-30841-DC-Culture-and-Events~y2010m3d24-Owner-of-local-radio-stations-protest-Performance-Rights-Act?cid=edition-rss-Washington_DC
"The Performance Rights Act is a tax on AM and FM radio stations to pay royalties to performers on recorded music played over the airwaves. Right, now only composers and their affiliated publishers receive these payments."
"The legislation would require some broadcasters to pay performance royalty fees. Stations with less than $1.25 million in annual revenue would be allowed to pay a flat fee of no more than $5,000 per year. Many radio broadcasting stations feel that the imposed tax will drive them out of business."
Ompas epäselvä asia kyllä!