canon: Slightly higher noise levels than its peers
Default dynamic range lags a bit behind its peers
samoin d3200. surkeaa kohinaa. askel menty molemmissa huonompaan suuntaan.
ps:http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/samsung-nx210
Default dynamic range lags a bit behind its peers
samoin d3200. surkeaa kohinaa. askel menty molemmissa huonompaan suuntaan.
ps:http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/samsung-nx210
Vastaukset 1
Vanhimmat
Askel huononpaan päin mistä?
D3200 on joka tapauksessa nikonin halpismalli. 650D canonin toiseksi halvin. Ei kai niiltä voi mahdottomia odottaa?
Entäs tuo sinun valintasi?
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/samsung-nx210/7
Longer than usual processing times after taking raw shots (but improved over NX200)
Fairly aggressive noise reduction starts blurring detail at lower ISOs and mixes with high levels of chroma noise at higher sensitivities
No live view feed in continuous shooting
No access to battery and memory card when mounted on a tripod
Limited highlight range with Smart Range feature turned off
Excessive noise reduction when Smart Range is turned on
No in-camera raw file conversion (and limited JPEG retouch options)
No dedicated external viewfinders available
In terms of image quality we found the NX210 to be identical to its predecessor. At base ISO it captures an impressive amount of detail in its JPEG files but at higher ISOs the camera uses pretty strong noise reduction that doesn't always battle the (chroma) noise in a very efficient way, resulting in images that lack low-contrast detail but also show the purple shimmer of blurred chroma noise in the shadow areas.
...
After a burst of raw files the camera now locks up for 'only' about 14 seconds (vs 34 on the NX200).
...