...PHP-mato. Tämä tiedoksi niille tolloille jotka tulevat tänne lähipäivinä väittämään että maailmalla on nyt löydettä ensimmäinen laitteista toiseen leviävä vaarallinen "Linux-haitake".
The original article (and others, similar) are IMHO irresponsible for a couple of reasons, not limited to:
1) The vulnerability (if it may even be called that) is NOT a gnu/linux vulnerability, its a PHP vulnerability.
2) The vulnerability affects a very limited subset of server types and DOES NOT affect most users on the net, nor most users who will read the article.
3) The vulnerability is NOT in the wild, is more hypothetical than real, and is not likely to be a problem across the boards. (most new routers, even home routers, are not going to be affected by this PHP vulnerability.
4) This article (and others, similar) are written to affect users with fear, uncertainty, anddoubt. It is time for FUD writing to come to a complete halt.
5) This vulnerability (if it may even be called that) is NOT a linux vulnerability... it is a server vulnerability in PHP... (it has absolutely nothing to do with linux (the kernel). This vulnerability is based in PHP, is hypothetical, and is a vulnerability on any server platform with the PHP extensions to the web server on that platform... this is not a gnu/linux , nor linux, vulnerability.
I will also add, that the vulnerability is supposed to work because of "well known" userid and password "path(s)" on the linux system... how silly! Almost every distribution handles the "path(s)" as well the userid and passwords for security, and safety (no worm is going to be able to read it). Also almost every distribution (including embedded systems) handle this issue "differently," meaning that wide-spread propagation of such a "vulnerability" is not realistic.
The original article is mostly just Symantec noise.
The original article (and others, similar) are IMHO irresponsible for a couple of reasons, not limited to:
1) The vulnerability (if it may even be called that) is NOT a gnu/linux vulnerability, its a PHP vulnerability.
2) The vulnerability affects a very limited subset of server types and DOES NOT affect most users on the net, nor most users who will read the article.
3) The vulnerability is NOT in the wild, is more hypothetical than real, and is not likely to be a problem across the boards. (most new routers, even home routers, are not going to be affected by this PHP vulnerability.
4) This article (and others, similar) are written to affect users with fear, uncertainty, anddoubt. It is time for FUD writing to come to a complete halt.
5) This vulnerability (if it may even be called that) is NOT a linux vulnerability... it is a server vulnerability in PHP... (it has absolutely nothing to do with linux (the kernel). This vulnerability is based in PHP, is hypothetical, and is a vulnerability on any server platform with the PHP extensions to the web server on that platform... this is not a gnu/linux , nor linux, vulnerability.
I will also add, that the vulnerability is supposed to work because of "well known" userid and password "path(s)" on the linux system... how silly! Almost every distribution handles the "path(s)" as well the userid and passwords for security, and safety (no worm is going to be able to read it). Also almost every distribution (including embedded systems) handle this issue "differently," meaning that wide-spread propagation of such a "vulnerability" is not realistic.
http://www.itworld.com/open-source/384754/linux-worm-wriggles-its-way-routers-cameras-and-other-devices
The original article (and others, similar) are IMHO irresponsible for a couple of reasons, not limited to:
1) The vulnerability (if it may even be called that) is NOT a gnu/linux vulnerability, its a PHP vulnerability.
2) The vulnerability affects a very limited subset of server types and DOES NOT affect most users on the net, nor most users who will read the article.
3) The vulnerability is NOT in the wild, is more hypothetical than real, and is not likely to be a problem across the boards. (most new routers, even home routers, are not going to be affected by this PHP vulnerability.
4) This article (and others, similar) are written to affect users with fear, uncertainty, anddoubt. It is time for FUD writing to come to a complete halt.
5) This vulnerability (if it may even be called that) is NOT a linux vulnerability... it is a server vulnerability in PHP... (it has absolutely nothing to do with linux (the kernel). This vulnerability is based in PHP, is hypothetical, and is a vulnerability on any server platform with the PHP extensions to the web server on that platform... this is not a gnu/linux , nor linux, vulnerability.
I will also add, that the vulnerability is supposed to work because of "well known" userid and password "path(s)" on the linux system... how silly! Almost every distribution handles the "path(s)" as well the userid and passwords for security, and safety (no worm is going to be able to read it). Also almost every distribution (including embedded systems) handle this issue "differently," meaning that wide-spread propagation of such a "vulnerability" is not realistic.
The original article is mostly just Symantec noise.
The original article (and others, similar) are IMHO irresponsible for a couple of reasons, not limited to:
1) The vulnerability (if it may even be called that) is NOT a gnu/linux vulnerability, its a PHP vulnerability.
2) The vulnerability affects a very limited subset of server types and DOES NOT affect most users on the net, nor most users who will read the article.
3) The vulnerability is NOT in the wild, is more hypothetical than real, and is not likely to be a problem across the boards. (most new routers, even home routers, are not going to be affected by this PHP vulnerability.
4) This article (and others, similar) are written to affect users with fear, uncertainty, anddoubt. It is time for FUD writing to come to a complete halt.
5) This vulnerability (if it may even be called that) is NOT a linux vulnerability... it is a server vulnerability in PHP... (it has absolutely nothing to do with linux (the kernel). This vulnerability is based in PHP, is hypothetical, and is a vulnerability on any server platform with the PHP extensions to the web server on that platform... this is not a gnu/linux , nor linux, vulnerability.
I will also add, that the vulnerability is supposed to work because of "well known" userid and password "path(s)" on the linux system... how silly! Almost every distribution handles the "path(s)" as well the userid and passwords for security, and safety (no worm is going to be able to read it). Also almost every distribution (including embedded systems) handle this issue "differently," meaning that wide-spread propagation of such a "vulnerability" is not realistic.
http://www.itworld.com/open-source/384754/linux-worm-wriggles-its-way-routers-cameras-and-other-devices
Vastaukset 12
Vanhimmat
linux ubuntu Tubutin on roskaa.
Rakkaalla lapsella on monta nimeä.
Jos ei osaa muuta niin täytyy levittää FUDia. :(
Kylläpäs tuli taas tuota linuks sekavuutta. Itse asiassa - tuosta ei ota pirukaan selvää! Tuommoisiahan ne päätteelle lyötävät loitsutkin on.
Ei siis ihme, ettei tubuttimia kukaan tervejärkinen käytä muuten kuin kokeillakseen ne lukemattomat moni-toimimattomuudet ja sitten palaavat taas Windowsiin!
Windows on selkokieleinen käyttöjärjestelmä!
Kukaan tervejärkinen ei tänä päivänä käytä enää windowsia vaan fiksut on siirtyneet linuxeihin tai Maciin!
Ja nimeäisit joskus ne oikeat toimimattomuudet, äläkä vain jauha paskaa. Ainoa toimimattomuus jonka itse pystyn nimeämään, on Windows-virukset ja Windows-haittaohjelmat!
turvallinen windows....
http://www.itviikko.fi/tietoturva/2013/11/29/windows-xpsta-loytyi-korjaamaton-aukko---hyokkays-kaynnissa/201316650/7
heh heh heh...
"Jos nimeäisit..." Olen pannut tällekin palstalle kaikkiaan 19 eri aijaa.com-linkkiä ja 17 videolinkkiä!
Varmaan olet jo nähnyt ne!
Joten, älä enempää pyytele niitä lisää tai minä teen niitä. Kyllä tubuttimissa toimimattomuuksia riittää, mitä videoida!
En minä ainakaan ole niitä nähnyt!
En tiedä yhtäkään toimimattomuutta, paitsi nuo Winkkuidiootille-nimimerkin mainitsemat.
Sitäpaitsi, Windows on se tubutin!
Ja kuten jälleen huomattiin - ei mennyt kuin päivä pari kun FUD:n levittäjät aloittivat propagandan levittämisen. Onneksi on olemassa Sodat-palsta joka jakaa asiallista informaatio Windows-peeloille.
Pahinta on kumminkin se että nuo FUDIn levittäjät levittää propagandaa myös muille kuten linux-palstoille kuten Pentti ehti jo tehdä.
http://keskustelu.suomi24.fi/node/11893135
Pentin viestiä on koitettu ilmiantaa asiattomana mutta ylläpito taitaa olla sama asia kuin Pentti eikä poista Pentin viestiä. :(
Tuliko teille linukshihuleille hätä siitä, että muutkin näkevät tubuttimen valtavat toimimattomuudet, eivätkä asenna sitä kurttausta koneelleen?
1. Windows on tubutin!
2. Linuxeissa ei ole muita toimimattomuuksia paitsi virukset ja madot!
3. Hihhuleista puheenollen , sinä olet itse hihhuli. Nimittäin windows-hihhuli.