Accuser's Mom Signed Video Releases

JA TAAS LISÄÄ TODISTEITA ETTÄ JACKSON ON SYYTÖN KAIKKIIN HÄNEEN KOHDISTUNEISIIN SYYTÖKSIIN:

The mother of the 12-year-old boy who has accused Michael Jackson of child molestation has claimed that she was forced to participate in a video extolling the singerīs virtues.But wait: It turns out that far from being forced to do anything, the mother and all three of her children signed releases agreeing to participate in the video project. And, according to my sources, not only did they sign the releases, but the mother re-wrote the standard boilerplate wording she received from Jacksonīs staff. The result was a shorter document that actually gave her no more rights than the original piece of paper.Iīve seen the releases, dated Feb. 19, 2003, and I can tell you they will be put into evidence when the State of California v. Michael Joseph Jackson goes to trial on Jan. 31, 2005. They will be just four of many other pieces of paper the Jackson defense is waiting to spring on Santa Barbara District Attorney Tom Sneddon.Ironically, on the witness stand recently during pre-trial hearings, the motherīs then-fiancé, U.S. Army Major Jay Jackson, conceded that he’d asked the video producers what they were going to do for this little family. But Iīm told that he became so bored during the actual video shoot that he left, and the mother wanting to put her kids in the video with an eye toward making them famous took over.Part of the indictment against Jackson includes a charge of conspiracy as well, founded on grand jury testimony from the mother that she was held against her will by Jacksonīs employees. At one point, she claimed that Jackson was sending her and her family to Brazil to get rid of them.But Iīve also seen paperwork indicating the mother was so happy to go on the Brazil vacation that she made the Jackson team buy her a new set of luggage.She wanted red Kiplinger suitcases,a source told me yesterday.She gave a description of what she wanted and she got them.The mother also ran up bills for her own shopping and for manicures and pedicures hardly something someone gets when theyīre kidnapped,an insider said with a chuckle. The bills are currently in the hands of the prosecutorīs office as the result of raids on Jackson papers last winter and spring. Meantime, a certain bad mix of egos may be causing trouble on Jacksonīs legal team. Iīve heard that lead criminal defense attorney Thomas Mesereau is not getting along with longtime Jackson criminal attorney Steve Cochran. The result could be the departure of Mesereau before Jacksonīs trial begins. Who could replace him? Iīve said it since the day this case first materialized last November: Miamiīs Roy Black is the answer for Jackson.
0108
Äänestä

Muut lukivat myös

Vastaukset

Vanhimmat

Ei vielä vastauksia

Aloittaja odottaa vastauksia. Kerro oma näkemyksesi ensimmäisenä.

Kommentoi aloitusta


heaven kirjoitti:

JA TAAS LISÄÄ TODISTEITA ETTÄ JACKSON ON SYYTÖN KAIKKIIN HÄNEEN KOHDISTUNEISIIN SYYTÖKSIIN:

The mother of the 12-year-old boy who has accused Michael Jackson of child molestation has claimed that she was forced to participate in a video extolling the singerīs virtues.But wait: It turns out that far from being forced to do anything, the mother and all three of her children signed releases agreeing to participate in the video project. And, according to my sources, not only did they sign the releases, but the mother re-wrote the standard boilerplate wording she received from Jacksonīs staff. The result was a shorter document that actually gave her no more rights than the original piece of paper.Iīve seen the releases, dated Feb. 19, 2003, and I can tell you they will be put into evidence when the State of California v. Michael Joseph Jackson goes to trial on Jan. 31, 2005. They will be just four of many other pieces of paper the Jackson defense is waiting to spring on Santa Barbara District Attorney Tom Sneddon.Ironically, on the witness stand recently during pre-trial hearings, the motherīs then-fiancé, U.S. Army Major Jay Jackson, conceded that he’d asked the video producers what they were going to do for this little family. But Iīm told that he became so bored during the actual video shoot that he left, and the mother wanting to put her kids in the video with an eye toward making them famous took over.Part of the indictment against Jackson includes a charge of conspiracy as well, founded on grand jury testimony from the mother that she was held against her will by Jacksonīs employees. At one point, she claimed that Jackson was sending her and her family to Brazil to get rid of them.But Iīve also seen paperwork indicating the mother was so happy to go on the Brazil vacation that she made the Jackson team buy her a new set of luggage.She wanted red Kiplinger suitcases,a source told me yesterday.She gave a description of what she wanted and she got them.The mother also ran up bills for her own shopping and for manicures and pedicures hardly something someone gets when theyīre kidnapped,an insider said with a chuckle. The bills are currently in the hands of the prosecutorīs office as the result of raids on Jackson papers last winter and spring. Meantime, a certain bad mix of egos may be causing trouble on Jacksonīs legal team. Iīve heard that lead criminal defense attorney Thomas Mesereau is not getting along with longtime Jackson criminal attorney Steve Cochran. The result could be the departure of Mesereau before Jacksonīs trial begins. Who could replace him? Iīve said it since the day this case first materialized last November: Miamiīs Roy Black is the answer for Jackson.

Anonyymi
5000

Ilmoita asiaton sisältö

  • Sisältää materiaalia, joka on loukkaavaa, herjaavaa, rasistista, uhkailevaa tai ahdistelevaa.

  • Materiaali sisältää nimiä, yhteystietoja tai muita henkilökohtaisia tietoja. Julkisuuden henkilöistä, julkisissa viroissa toimivista ihmisistä sekä yritysten vastuuhenkilöistä saa keskustella työhön liittyen. Myös yksityiselämään liittyvistä asioista voi keskustella siltä osin, kuin niistä on julkisesti kerrottu.

  • Sisältää lapsille haitallista tai heiltä kiellettyä materiaalia. Seksuaalinen sisältö on sallittua aiheeseen tarkoitetuilla palstoilla, joiden ikäraja on 18 vuotta.

  • Lainvastaista sisältöä voi olla mm. yksityiselämää loukkaavan tiedon levitys, kiihottaminen kansanryhmää vastaan, laiton uhkaaminen, alaikäisiin liittyvä seksuaalinen sisältö/grooming, petokset, identiteettivarkaudet, kunnianloukkaukset ja tekijänoikeusrikkomukset.

  • Sisältö ei liity palstan tai keskusteluketjun aiheeseen.

  • Viesti ei ole suomea tai ruotsia (pl. International Forums), se sisältää mainontaa, se sisältää tekijänoikeuksin suojattua materiaalia, se on massapostitus tai jokin muu syy.

Jaa keskustelu