Accusing family's History of SHAKEDOWNS PT.1

Given current revelations about the accuser's mother's past, which includes once accusing her ex-husband of sexually molesting the accuser and falsely imprisoning them, it seems appropriate that we recap what other people have had to say about this family. In March 2004, NBC did an interview with the attorney who represented JCPenney in a lawsuit filed against them by this very same family. In a stunning development yesterday (March 4), the attorney who represented JCPenney in a court case involving the family now accusing Jackson, released over 100 pages of documents from that case, and blasted the mother's motives both in their case and in the Jackson case.The attorney, Tom Griffin, was interviewed by NBC's Mike Taibbi, the same reporter who broke the story about Richard Matsuura totally blasting the defamatory Vanity Fair article about Jackson in which Matsuura is cited as one of the children allegedly given wine by Jackson Tom Griffin calls what the mother did to JCPenney a shakedown. What was a small altercation with security after some of the family members were actually caught outside of the store with an arm full of shoplifted clothes--turned into a $3 million lawsuit. The family claimed they were beaten severely in broad daylight by security to the extent where they all had broken bones. As of now, it is unknown if any medical records exist of the familys alleged beating by store security. Griffin says there was absolutely nothing to backup their claims. From the number of documents obtained by NBC, it would seem there was a substantial amount of information gathered by JCPenney's defense team in that case. During his investigation, Griffin says: It became readily apparent that this was an incident in my opinion, a scam, to extract money from JCPenney.

JATKOA SEURAA SEURAAVASSA ARTIKKELISSANI.
0254
Äänestä

Muut lukivat myös

Vastaukset

Vanhimmat

Ei vielä vastauksia

Aloittaja odottaa vastauksia. Kerro oma näkemyksesi ensimmäisenä.

Kommentoi aloitusta


heaven kirjoitti:

Given current revelations about the accuser's mother's past, which includes once accusing her ex-husband of sexually molesting the accuser and falsely imprisoning them, it seems appropriate that we recap what other people have had to say about this family. In March 2004, NBC did an interview with the attorney who represented JCPenney in a lawsuit filed against them by this very same family. In a stunning development yesterday (March 4), the attorney who represented JCPenney in a court case involving the family now accusing Jackson, released over 100 pages of documents from that case, and blasted the mother's motives both in their case and in the Jackson case.The attorney, Tom Griffin, was interviewed by NBC's Mike Taibbi, the same reporter who broke the story about Richard Matsuura totally blasting the defamatory Vanity Fair article about Jackson in which Matsuura is cited as one of the children allegedly given wine by Jackson Tom Griffin calls what the mother did to JCPenney a shakedown. What was a small altercation with security after some of the family members were actually caught outside of the store with an arm full of shoplifted clothes--turned into a $3 million lawsuit. The family claimed they were beaten severely in broad daylight by security to the extent where they all had broken bones. As of now, it is unknown if any medical records exist of the familys alleged beating by store security. Griffin says there was absolutely nothing to backup their claims. From the number of documents obtained by NBC, it would seem there was a substantial amount of information gathered by JCPenney's defense team in that case. During his investigation, Griffin says: It became readily apparent that this was an incident in my opinion, a scam, to extract money from JCPenney.

JATKOA SEURAA SEURAAVASSA ARTIKKELISSANI.

Anonyymi
5000

Ilmoita asiaton sisältö

  • Sisältää materiaalia, joka on loukkaavaa, herjaavaa, rasistista, uhkailevaa tai ahdistelevaa.

  • Materiaali sisältää nimiä, yhteystietoja tai muita henkilökohtaisia tietoja. Julkisuuden henkilöistä, julkisissa viroissa toimivista ihmisistä sekä yritysten vastuuhenkilöistä saa keskustella työhön liittyen. Myös yksityiselämään liittyvistä asioista voi keskustella siltä osin, kuin niistä on julkisesti kerrottu.

  • Sisältää lapsille haitallista tai heiltä kiellettyä materiaalia. Seksuaalinen sisältö on sallittua aiheeseen tarkoitetuilla palstoilla, joiden ikäraja on 18 vuotta.

  • Lainvastaista sisältöä voi olla mm. yksityiselämää loukkaavan tiedon levitys, kiihottaminen kansanryhmää vastaan, laiton uhkaaminen, alaikäisiin liittyvä seksuaalinen sisältö/grooming, petokset, identiteettivarkaudet, kunnianloukkaukset ja tekijänoikeusrikkomukset.

  • Sisältö ei liity palstan tai keskusteluketjun aiheeseen.

  • Viesti ei ole suomea tai ruotsia (pl. International Forums), se sisältää mainontaa, se sisältää tekijänoikeuksin suojattua materiaalia, se on massapostitus tai jokin muu syy.

Jaa keskustelu