Hyvä Aapo

Oliko Muhammed murhaaja?

http://keskustelu.suomi24.fi/show.fcgi?category=1000000000000003&conference=1000000000000010&posting=22000000002169657#22000000002169657

Once Muhammad was given permission to kill in the name of Allah, it was not long before the first murder instigated by Muhammad took place. The following is from The Life of Muhammad, translated by A. Guillaume, which is a translation and combination of the two earliest, most reliable biographies of Muhammad titled The Life and History of Muhammad, by Ibn Ishaq, an early Muslim scholar and widely read by educated Muslims:

The apostle [Muhammad] said, “Kill any Jew that falls into your power.” Thereupon Muhayyisa Masud leapt upon Ibn Sunayna, a Jewish merchant with whom they had social and business relations, and killed him. Huwayyisa was not a Muslim at the time though he was the elder brother. When Muhayyisa killed him Huwayyisa began to beat him, saying, “You enemy of God, did you kill him when much of the fat on your belly comes from his wealth?” Muhayyisa answered, “Had the one who ordered me to kill him ordered me to kill you I would have cut your head off.

This incident is reported by many ancient Muslim sources, as are all the incidents from the life of Muhammad that will be presented in this paper. Notice that the murder of Ibn Sunayna was committed upon Muhammad’s direct command. Also, let this fact sink in: this Muslim murderer stated that he would not have hesitated to kill his own brother if Muhammad had so ordered!

This explains the response a Christian missionary received when he asked a Muslim, “What if your son became a Christian. What would you do?” The Muslim’s immediate, sincere response was, “I’d cut his throat.”5 Though this is probably an extreme reaction for most Muslims (and illegal, I’m sure, even in Muslim countries), the pressure and even physical punishment exacted against family members who stray from the faith of Islam is horrific and has no parallel in any other religion.

A second terrorist incident involved another one of Muhammad’s requests: this one for his men to murder an old Jewish man named Abu Afak. Abu Afak was 120 years old and had urged his fellow Medinans to question Muhammad’s legitimacy. Ibn Ishaq, and many other biographers of Muhammad, describe how Abu Afak lampooned Muhammad by writing satirical verses about him and trying to persuade people not to follow him. In response, Muhammad asked, “Who will deal with this rascal for me?” Immediately, one of his followers went and killed him.

This was the second man murdered upon Muhammad’s bidding. Abu Afak was a feeble 120 year-old man who was no physical threat to Muhammad, nor did he urge people to commit any violent acts against Muhammad or the Muslims. Not one Muslim scholar claims that Abu Afak urged his fellow Arabs to attack or harm Muhammad in any way. At no point did Muhammad or his leaders consult with Jewish leaders about Abu Afak’s opposition, nor did they discuss the matter with Abu Afak himself. This was an outright murder of one of Muhammad’s critics, eliminated because he spoke his mind out of concern for his friends.

Another incident involved Muhammad’s request for his men to murder a woman named Asma b. Marwan. When Abu Afak was killed, this woman followed his example, took up her pen and wrote satyrical verses to discourage people from following Muhammad. Seeing Muhammad as a cold-blooded murderer, she made the mistake of calling for Muhammad’s death. Listen to Ibn Ishaq’s description of her fate:

When the apostle heard what she had said he said, “Who will rid me of Marwan’s daughter?” Umayr b. Adiy al-Khatmi who was with him heard him, and that very night he went to her house and killed her. In the morning he came to the apostle and told him what he had done and he [Muhammad] said, “You have helped God and His apostle, O Umayr!” When he asked if he would have to bear any evil consequences the apostle said, “Two goats won’t butt their heads about her”, so Umayr went back to his people.

Now there was a great commotion among B. Khatma that day about the affair of bint [girl] Marwan. She had five sons, and when Umayr went to them from the apostle he said, “I have killed bint Marwan, O sons of Khatma. Withstand me if you can; don’t keep me waiting.
Another ancient Muslim source goes into more detail of the murder:

Umayr Ibn Adi came to her in the night and entered her house. Her children were sleeping around her. There was one whom she was suckling. He searched her with his hand because he was blind, and separated the child from her. He thrust his sword in her chest till it pierced up to her back. Then he offered the morning prayers with the prophet at al-Medina. The apostle of Allah said to him: “Have you slain the daughter of Marwan?” He said: “Yes. Is there something more for me to do?” He [Muhammad] said: “No two goats will butt together about her. This was the word that was first heard from the apostle of Allah. The apostle of Allah called him Umayr, “basir” (the seeing).
........xxx......

Huomautin aiemmassa vastauksessani monta sivua sitten, että pidän tuollaista ”purkaustasi”-termiä kehnona retoriikkana.

Mutta yritetäänpä kuitenkin vastata.

Jos joku lähes viisikymppinen mies otti toisessa kulttuurissa, toisenlaisessa yhteiskunnassa, lähes tuhat viisisataa vuotta sitten, kenenkään kanssaihmisen paheksumatta ja silloisten moraalinormien ja lakien kanssa täysin sopusoinnussa ottaa vaimokseen 6-vuotiaan, totean vain, että se oli silloinen tapa, jolla oli varmaankin omat perusteensa – kuten olikin. En myöskään ryhtyisi erityisesti mietiskelemään kyseisen pariskunnan aviollista yhteiselämää – kuten en yleensäkään pohdiskele kovin paljoa muiden ihmisten aviollista yhdyselämää.

Sen sijaan jos joku lähes viisikymppinen mies ottaisi nyky-Suomessa vaimokseen kuusivuotiaan pikkutytön (miten se voisi tapahtua, sitä en tiedä), ilmiantaisin hänet sen kummemmin nimittelemättä poliisille, joka hoitaisi asian loppuun. Leimaamisen ja nimittelemisen jättäisin suosiolla roskalehdistölle.

Siispä:

Mitä mieltä tahansa sinä olet tai vaikkapa nimim. Esko onkin Muhammedista, tosiasia on, että hän on erään Suomessa rekisteröidyn, Suomen lakien suojaa nauttivan uskonnollisen yhteisön syvästi kunnioittama profeetta ja on ehdottomasti syytä olettaa, että hänen nimittelemisensä on myös omiaan syvästi loukkaamaan tämän yhteisön jäseniä.

Niinpä toistan vielä kerran sen, mitä jo aiemmin totesin: "Jos joku kirjoittaa jatkuvasti sellaisia tekstejä, joissa hän nimittelee tietyn kansanryhmän syvästi kunnioittamaa profeettaa pedofiiliksi, irstaaksi, huoripukiksi ja murhaajaksi, sanoo heidän uskontonsa olevan perseestä ja peräisin paholaisesta, terrorismiuskonto jne., ja jos tämä samainen henkilö ilmoittaa olevansa kristitty, olen todellakin taipuvainen ajattelemaan, että hänen _henkilökohtainen_ kristillisyytensä on luonteeltaan rasistista ja fasistista. - Sitä paitsi tällainen henkilö rikkoo kaiken aikaa Suomen lakia eli toimii rikollisesti.”


Vrt: http://keskustelu.suomi24.fi/show.fcgi?category=1000000000000003&conference=1000000000000010&posting=22000000005160040