Siis hänelle, joka osaa Suomea, mutta ilmeisesti vannoutuneeena anglokulttuurin ihailijana kirjoittaa englanniksi.
Hyväksytkö naisten ympärileikkauksen?
http://keskustelu.suomi24.fi/show.fcgi?category=1000000000000003&conference=1000000000000010&posting=22000000027795307
Hyväksytkö naisten ympärileikkauksen?
http://keskustelu.suomi24.fi/show.fcgi?category=1000000000000003&conference=1000000000000010&posting=22000000027795307
Vastaukset 6
Vanhimmat
you didn't notice. My Finnish spelling and vocabulary may not be so good, so sorry about that.
I was talking about MALE CIRCUMCISION, many of you ask why that foreskin is created in first place, so I'm asking you why we all have ARMPIT HAIR, PUBIC HAIR AND HAIR ON LEGS, does that mean we cannot shave it off because it exists there in first place?
The answer is that both Male Circumcision and removing body hairs have more advantages than disadvanatages.
It's different with female circumcision.
There is Female genital mutilation(cutting) and female circumcision in 4 different stages, they are not all the same:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_cutting#Different_types
2.1 Type I: Clitoridectomy
2.2 Type II: Excision
2.3 Type III: Infibulation
2.4 Type IV: Other types
That WEAK hadith, which enemies of islam like to use does not even talk about removal of clitoris or infibulation but about removal the clitoral hood, which is today practised by PLASTIC SURGENTS!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clitoral_hood
"Some women have large clitoral hoods that completely cover the clitoral glans. Some of these can be retracted to expose the clitoral glans; others do not retract. "
"It is increasingly common to have the hood pierced and a ring inserted in a similar way to an ear piercing. Though much less common, other women opt to have the hood surgically trimmed or removed so as to permanently expose part or all of the clitoral head. Such a procedure is very much like male circumcision and is also known as female circumcision, but should not be confused with more extensive forms."
I do not support it, because it is pre-islamic social custom which is practised today also among Christians: Egypt (Copts), Ethiopia, Ghana, Latin America etc.
How come none of you has an answer to that phenomena? From where Christians got that idea?
And also if it would be sunna it would be known in ALL islamic countries, and it's NOT. Mostly it's in Africa.
It's forbidden by most muslim clergy.
Tyttöjen ympärileikkauksesta on monta hadithia, ei mitään yhtä heikkoa.
Oletko siis täydellisesti tyttöjen ympärileikkausta vastaan? Ei edes sunna-leikkausta?
Toinen asia. Väität, että tyttöjen ympärileikkaus ei kuulu islamiin, koska se on tapa _ennen_ islamia.
Kaaban temppeliä kierrettiin samalla tavalla myös ennen islamia.
Muhammad ei kieltänyt tyttöjen ympärileikkausta, vaan päinvastoin antoi ohjeita, kuinka pitää leikata.
Perustelusi ovat kaikein kaikkiaan huonoja.
dirty kafir
länsimaisen naisen puhe:
http://www.vibereview.com/how_to/clitoral_hood_removal_new_ways_of_heightening_arousal
http://www.labiaplastycenters.com/clitoral_reducation.htm
Nainen on eri asia kuin pikkutyttö. Ymmärrättekö?