SUPO`s tactics reveals dishonesty

Rusi, the victim of the plot

In the court of Finland`s capital is in progress a judicial farce. A certain Finnish ambassador has to seek justice, against the Finnish Security Police, SUPO, in the same court which already made a political judgement to conceal the lists of former Finnish STASI spies, including expectedly very high-ranking, active political name. Finland has always declared belonging to the hard core of the EU, but this decision points more to the communist system only left in Europe. Now Finland presents a show, that the lists are opening up to scholars who will tell that all the names are harmful.

SUPO`s tactics in the trial reveals rather clearly, that the ambassador became a victim of political plot where originally the government of that time, in spring 2002, had to seek a some electoral weapon as a counterbalance for the stunning news; the invaluable state company SONERA had been wrecked, vast billions were lost suspiciously in German by the government. However the sensation of SONERA did not last long, as SUPO confirmed soon much bigger sensation by the help of social democratic YLE-media, the spying case of the centrist MP candidate. Today we know also that the grounds of SUPO were non existent.

The farseeing tactics of SUPO has been, in the worst threatening case of it that points to the aggravated crime in the office - to prevent the key witness from testifying in court. That key witness knows the right answers and the right question produces the right answer in the court. The right question might be: which of the leading politicians of the Social Democratic Party knew before all the others that Alpo Rusi will get into the investigation of the Security Police ?

The concerned testimony is a very threatening to the SUPO because the key witness could not take the risk of lying which could possible bring to him later a prison sentence of a one year for committing perjury. At least the audience will see, whether the key witness is as able to testify as he has been giving the last interview in the YLE-media. Not so long ago. A honest SUPO policy would mean that the key witness would testify openly.

1

256

    Vastaukset

    Anonyymi (Kirjaudu / Rekisteröidy)
    5000
    • Daean

      That this is a classic case where police is investigating police.
      Now, if you could decide yourself in court where you would be the prosecuted, but *also* the judge and jury, what would you say?
      If the guys investigating SUPO are part of SOPU, as well and everything they discover is also conviniently classified(to which they can always point out in court, thus negating the testimony at hand) as well as just saying they had an anonymous tip.
      Rusi wins, even if he loses. The German expert,-who again conviniently couldn't arrive at court, because the court wouldn't allow to postpone the courtdates so the man could come to testify-, said in two Finnish newspapers(Turun Sanomat & Aamulehti), that SUPO had known for a long time that Alpo Rusi couldn't be guilty and wasn't even near Finland at the time of alledged accusations.
      Of course, that makes things twice as interesting, especially when SUPO can say whatever they want to and withold all documents based on their right to do so, written in the finnish law.
      Of course, who can say who speaks the truth and if the government really has done something shady.. but it *does* smell fishy. =)

      -My opinion. Not yours.-

    Ketjusta on poistettu 0 sääntöjenvastaista viestiä.

    Luetuimmat keskustelut

    1. Suomen kansa haluaa Antti Lindtmanista pääministerin

      Lindtman on miltei tuplasti suositumpi kuin etunimikaimansa Kaikkonen. Näin kertoo porvarimedian teettämä kysely. http
      Maailman menoa
      243
      4203
    2. Vain 21% kannattaa Lindtmania pääministeriksi

      se on selvästi vähemmän kuin puolueen kannatus, mites nyt noin?
      Maailman menoa
      117
      2659
    3. Miten löydän sinut

      Ja saan sanottua kaiken mitä haluan sinulle kertoa? Ja kuinka kuuntelisit minua sen hetken? Kuinka voin ilmaista sen mit
      Ikävä
      41
      2412
    4. Vaikea tilanne

      Hieman kolkuttaa omatuntoa, kun on osoittanut kiinnostusta väärää naista kohtaan. En ymmärrä miten toinen on voinut te
      Ikävä
      116
      1446
    5. Yöllinen autolla kaahari Heinolan seudulla

      Asukkaita häiriköivän nuoren herran autokaahaus keskustelu poistettu, onko jokin hyvävelijärjestelmä käytössä ?
      Heinola
      81
      1446
    6. Milloin kaivatullasi

      .. on nimipäivä?
      Ikävä
      48
      1189
    7. Kehtaisitko näyttäytyä

      kaivattusi seurassa?
      Ikävä
      78
      1107
    8. Ne viimeiset kerrat

      Kun katsoit minua niin lämpimästi. En unohda sitä ❤️
      Ikävä
      59
      973
    9. Missä kunnassa kaivattusi asuu

      Kuinka tarkkaa uskalla sanoa?
      Ikävä
      45
      966
    10. Emme koskaan keskustelleet kasvotusten syistä välirikollemme

      Enkä voisi kertoa perimmäistä rehellistä syytä. Kerroin sinulle pintapuolisen ”paketin” ja otin tavallaan omalle vastuu
      Ikävä
      58
      941
    Aihe