Espanjantauti: aspiirini ja d-vitamiini

ENSIN VITAMIINI D:STÄ JA ESPANJANTAUDISTA

"However, other facts suggest Vitamin D was protective in 1918:

The mass of deaths in the Northern hemisphere occurred when Vitamin D levels were low (fall and winter).

While infection rates were similar for sailors and troops on infected troop transport ships, the sailors had 1/4 the mortality of the troops. One has to assume the 25(OH)D of sailors aboard 1918 troop transport ships was higher than the troops inside.

Underground coal miners in North America had the highest mortality of any occupation.

The incidence of influenza in the French army was much higher in troops away from the front (assumably in barracks) than in front line troops.

Open air hospitals in North America allegedly had lower mortalities than regular hospitals.

Mortality for sailors at sea was markedly lower than sailors ashore, despite the crowed conditions on board.

In the Western Front, the 1918 flu disappeared in August (when 25(OH)D levels reach their peak) only to return in September, when 25(OH)D levels fall rapidly."

ScienceDaily (Oct. 3, 2009) — The devastation of the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic is well known, but a new article suggests a surprising factor in the high death toll: the misuse of aspirin. Appearing in the November 1 issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases and available online now, the article sounds a cautionary note as present day concerns about the novel H1N1 virus run high."

JA SITTEN ASPIRIINISTA JA ESPANJANTAUDISTA

High aspirin dosing levels used to treat patients during the 1918-1919 pandemic are now known to cause, in some cases, toxicity and a dangerous build up of fluid in the lungs, which may have contributed to the incidence and severity of symptoms, bacterial infections, and mortality. Additionally, autopsy reports from 1918 are consistent with what we know today about the dangers of aspirin toxicity, as well as the expected viral causes of death.

The motivation behind the improper use of aspirin is a cautionary tale, said author Karen Starko, MD. In 1918, physicians did not fully understand either the dosing or pharmacology of aspirin, yet they were willing to recommend it. Its use was promoted by the drug industry, endorsed by doctors wanting to “do something,” and accepted by families and institutions desperate for hope.

“Understanding these natural forces is important when considering choices in the future,” Dr. Starko said. “Interventions cut both ways. Medicines can save and improve our lives. Yet we must be ever mindful of the importance of dose, of balancing benefits and risks, and of the limitations of our studies.”
6170
Äänestä

Muut lukivat myös

Vastaukset 6

Vanhimmat

auringosta huolimatta. Etelänmeren saarillakin kuoli melkein kaikki ja takuulla paistoi.

Toi asperiini oli samanlainen huuhaa-lääke silloin kuin D-vitamiini nyt. Sitä syötiin valtavia määriä ja tulos oli se mikä oli. Nyt sitten syädään valtavia määriä D-vitamiinia. Onko yhtään sen järkevämpää.

Äänestä
  • ovat samanlaisia?

    Minkälaisen alan koulutuksen ja opit olet saanut?

    Äänestä

  • ja D-vitamiini kirjoitti:

    ovat samanlaisia?

    Minkälaisen alan koulutuksen ja opit olet saanut?

    Maatalouslomittajan.

    Äänestä

  • ja D-vitamiini kirjoitti:

    ovat samanlaisia?

    Minkälaisen alan koulutuksen ja opit olet saanut?

    tietysti. Ei koostumukseltaan.

    Äänestä

  • on koulutsta kirjoitti:

    Maatalouslomittajan.

    muka huonompi kuin joku toinen. Jos ei olisi maatalouslomittajia niin ei maatalouskaan pyörisi ja et saisi maitoa etkä lihaa.

    Äänestä

Kommentoi aloitusta


Spanish pöpö kirjoitti:

ENSIN VITAMIINI D:STÄ JA ESPANJANTAUDISTA

"However, other facts suggest Vitamin D was protective in 1918:

The mass of deaths in the Northern hemisphere occurred when Vitamin D levels were low (fall and winter).

While infection rates were similar for sailors and troops on infected troop transport ships, the sailors had 1/4 the mortality of the troops. One has to assume the 25(OH)D of sailors aboard 1918 troop transport ships was higher than the troops inside.

Underground coal miners in North America had the highest mortality of any occupation.

The incidence of influenza in the French army was much higher in troops away from the front (assumably in barracks) than in front line troops.

Open air hospitals in North America allegedly had lower mortalities than regular hospitals.

Mortality for sailors at sea was markedly lower than sailors ashore, despite the crowed conditions on board.

In the Western Front, the 1918 flu disappeared in August (when 25(OH)D levels reach their peak) only to return in September, when 25(OH)D levels fall rapidly."

ScienceDaily (Oct. 3, 2009) — The devastation of the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic is well known, but a new article suggests a surprising factor in the high death toll: the misuse of aspirin. Appearing in the November 1 issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases and available online now, the article sounds a cautionary note as present day concerns about the novel H1N1 virus run high."

JA SITTEN ASPIRIINISTA JA ESPANJANTAUDISTA

High aspirin dosing levels used to treat patients during the 1918-1919 pandemic are now known to cause, in some cases, toxicity and a dangerous build up of fluid in the lungs, which may have contributed to the incidence and severity of symptoms, bacterial infections, and mortality. Additionally, autopsy reports from 1918 are consistent with what we know today about the dangers of aspirin toxicity, as well as the expected viral causes of death.

The motivation behind the improper use of aspirin is a cautionary tale, said author Karen Starko, MD. In 1918, physicians did not fully understand either the dosing or pharmacology of aspirin, yet they were willing to recommend it. Its use was promoted by the drug industry, endorsed by doctors wanting to “do something,” and accepted by families and institutions desperate for hope.

“Understanding these natural forces is important when considering choices in the future,” Dr. Starko said. “Interventions cut both ways. Medicines can save and improve our lives. Yet we must be ever mindful of the importance of dose, of balancing benefits and risks, and of the limitations of our studies.”

Anonyymi
5000

Ilmoita asiaton sisältö

  • Sisältää materiaalia, joka on loukkaavaa, herjaavaa, rasistista, uhkailevaa tai ahdistelevaa.

  • Materiaali sisältää nimiä, yhteystietoja tai muita henkilökohtaisia tietoja. Julkisuuden henkilöistä, julkisissa viroissa toimivista ihmisistä sekä yritysten vastuuhenkilöistä saa keskustella työhön liittyen. Myös yksityiselämään liittyvistä asioista voi keskustella siltä osin, kuin niistä on julkisesti kerrottu.

  • Sisältää lapsille haitallista tai heiltä kiellettyä materiaalia. Seksuaalinen sisältö on sallittua aiheeseen tarkoitetuilla palstoilla, joiden ikäraja on 18 vuotta.

  • Lainvastaista sisältöä voi olla mm. yksityiselämää loukkaavan tiedon levitys, kiihottaminen kansanryhmää vastaan, laiton uhkaaminen, alaikäisiin liittyvä seksuaalinen sisältö/grooming, petokset, identiteettivarkaudet, kunnianloukkaukset ja tekijänoikeusrikkomukset.

  • Sisältö ei liity palstan tai keskusteluketjun aiheeseen.

  • Viesti ei ole suomea tai ruotsia (pl. International Forums), se sisältää mainontaa, se sisältää tekijänoikeuksin suojattua materiaalia, se on massapostitus tai jokin muu syy.

Jaa keskustelu