I was debating with a friend of mine
about this thing called election
and these two socalled candidates,
we soon gave up because it felt
a bit pointless?
..you can propably imagine who is our
favorite to be the next ruler of the free world?
*Please, disagree*
so, is there anyone who has opinions
one way or the other & why?
Especially if there`s any Americans who
know what the whole "war against terrorism"
means in everyday life and what´s going to
happen in the future?
"can a puppet grow thumbs?"
about this thing called election
and these two socalled candidates,
we soon gave up because it felt
a bit pointless?
..you can propably imagine who is our
favorite to be the next ruler of the free world?
*Please, disagree*
so, is there anyone who has opinions
one way or the other & why?
Especially if there`s any Americans who
know what the whole "war against terrorism"
means in everyday life and what´s going to
happen in the future?
"can a puppet grow thumbs?"
Vastaukset 1
Vanhimmat
First, sorry about my english. It's bad, I know.
Half of americans don't really know what they've done. Im not sure about Kerry but Nader was my choise. I'm really sorry for not voting him, that's because I have right to vote only here in Finland ;)
'cause Nader isn't democrat or rebuplic candidate, he's my choise. The brainwash that those parties do, pple in America voting someone who's good handshaker, even a dumbass, is something I don't understand.
Is it so, there was two narcistic idiots to vote, and stupid americans voted one of them? also 100 000 000$ of foreign loan, way to go U.S.A.!
Provocative or not, this is my pure opinion :)