Lait uskonnollisesta keskustelusta

Esko kirjoitti:

Tällä palstalla on hyvin paljon esitetty syytöksiä kiihottamisesta kansanryhmää vastaan.

Suomen laissa se on sanottu hyvin lyhyesti, mutta riittävän selvästi. Se on yhdestä sanasta kiinni.

Katselin Australian Victorian osavaltion lakia ja siinä on asiaa selitetty laajemmin. Siinä kerrotaan, milloin asiaa ei pidetä laittomana kiihottamisena kansanryhmä vastaan.

RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE ACT 2001

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/rarta2001265/

PART 2-UNLAWFUL CONDUCT

Division 1-Unlawful Vilification

7. Racial vilification unlawful
8. Religious vilification unlawful
9. Motive and dominant ground irrelevant
10. Incorrect assumption as to race or religious belief or activity
11. Exceptions-public conduct
12. Exceptions-private conduct
......................................................................................
Exceptions-public conduct

11. Exceptions-public conduct

(1) A person does not contravene section 7 or 8 if the person establishes that
the person's conduct was engaged in reasonably and in good faith-

(a) in the performance, exhibition or distribution of an artistic work; or

(b) in the course of any statement, publication, discussion or debate made
or held, or any other conduct engaged in, for-

(i) any genuine academic, artistic, religious or scientific purpose; or

(ii) any purpose that is in the public interest; or

(c) in making or publishing a fair and accurate report of any event or
matter of public interest.

(2) For the purpose of sub-section (1)(b)(i), a religious purpose includes,
but is not limited to, conveying or teaching a religion or proselytising.

kirjoitti:

Anonyymi

Kirjoita kommentti

5000

Lähetä