In Finland the criminal political elite together with corrupt legal officials and ombudsmen subordinated to the elite, believe that they can only walk away after arranging illegal Parliamentary elections again where the political opposition was kept mostly in the dark and craftily at the most in minor role by the state-run TV-channels. Illegal !
Now this politically criminal elite believes that it can enjoy marvelous international attention in peace during the Eurovision song contest where the same outrageous state-owned media plays an important role. But now there is full reason to arrange big democracy-demonstrations and protest marches on the streets. The new Finnish policy-makers have got their seats by ruling the concerned media and by breaking the constitutional party law.
And this same plotting by the political elite will continue against the real opposition unless we start to fight by all legal means against the electoral fraud. There are no fair and legal elections without even-handed and law-abiding media, as in the criminal situation in Finland.
Now this politically criminal elite believes that it can enjoy marvelous international attention in peace during the Eurovision song contest where the same outrageous state-owned media plays an important role. But now there is full reason to arrange big democracy-demonstrations and protest marches on the streets. The new Finnish policy-makers have got their seats by ruling the concerned media and by breaking the constitutional party law.
And this same plotting by the political elite will continue against the real opposition unless we start to fight by all legal means against the electoral fraud. There are no fair and legal elections without even-handed and law-abiding media, as in the criminal situation in Finland.
Vastaukset 1
Vanhimmat
So your candidate wasn't elected and it is because:
a) The Candidate wasn't popular.
b) His agenda wasn't popular.
c) He didn't bother to go out and explain his point of view to the public (it was much more fun to just argue finer point of the platform among the people who already were voting for him).
or
d) Everyone else is to blame as we should have won. After all, in our private conversations among ourselves, we got 99% of the preliminary votes (John wasn't there, he was out getting fish and chips).
Like true to the colours politician, you blame everyone else. How about just once, you would start from the rarest of questions: What is it that WE did wrong? Just for the kicks, as you are obviously true political elite and as such uncapable of making mistakes.