Finnish "Rostroi" robbed SIPOO

Many Finns and Russians have a good laugh about the Finnish double standard. In Finland was recently made a terrible scene when Russian administrative office of construction, Rostroi, in Petersburgh, decided to take possession of the building site, previously controlled by the Finnish container company.

Now as like the “Rostroi” Government of Finland approved that the capital city of Helsinki is allowed to rob its neighboring municipality of Sipoo by annexing a slice of about 30 square kilometers of Sipoo to the Capital ! Besides the ownership of concerned area of Sipoo has not been unclear in any way. On the contrary to the dispute of Russia. This is called double standard a la Finland.

Helsinki is already big enough, as it is though how many sick and dangerous people lives there in the streets in malaise and nobody dares to go out evenings any more.
4495
Äänestä

Muut lukivat myös

Vastaukset 4

Vanhimmat

Obviously analogy doesn't work because the russian goverment are not willing to take responsibility hurting legislated laws.

As far as I'm concerned they are only hurting themselves because there are no reliable laws which are biding the russian goverment. It seems there's still a lot of work to do, if one wants to participate international tradecommunity.

Äänestä

robs all Finns, in the form of tha natioanl bi-linualism, where the Swedish language is taught by force to all Finnish pupils in all schools at all levels, up to and including universities, and is required from anybody wanting to get into an official job.

The ridiculous part here is that the Swedish language is totally unnecessary for the Finns for any practical purpose. Even in Sweden Finns can do bhetter with English than Swedish! Still Swedish is required and taught by force to all Finns!

Finland wastes billions into this appalling circus every year. Most of the money just disappears into uneffectiveness, but a reasonable amount of it is directed into the pockets of the Swedes, both in Finland and Sweden.

In practice, this system has created a complete Swedish infrastructure for the businesses of Sweden to compete in Finland with better terms than Finns. And a system for the Swedish Rostroi to work here.

Sipoo has been one of the strongest and most fanatically defended fortresses of the Swedes, and they have done what ever is possible to keep Finns out. But little by little, the common sense is winning in Finland, also in the forceswedish problem.

Äänestä
  • Oletko kenties Sipoolainen ihan kun noin paljon asioista "tiedät"?

    Äänestä

  • sinulla. kirjoitti:

    Oletko kenties Sipoolainen ihan kun noin paljon asioista "tiedät"?

    tarkentaa, mikä siinä sinun mielestäsi oli "ennakkoluuloa"?

    Äänestä

Ketjusta on poistettu 4 sääntöjenvastaista viestiä.

Kommentoi aloitusta


Double Standard a la Finland kirjoitti:

Many Finns and Russians have a good laugh about the Finnish double standard. In Finland was recently made a terrible scene when Russian administrative office of construction, Rostroi, in Petersburgh, decided to take possession of the building site, previously controlled by the Finnish container company.

Now as like the “Rostroi” Government of Finland approved that the capital city of Helsinki is allowed to rob its neighboring municipality of Sipoo by annexing a slice of about 30 square kilometers of Sipoo to the Capital ! Besides the ownership of concerned area of Sipoo has not been unclear in any way. On the contrary to the dispute of Russia. This is called double standard a la Finland.

Helsinki is already big enough, as it is though how many sick and dangerous people lives there in the streets in malaise and nobody dares to go out evenings any more.

Anonyymi
5000

Ilmoita asiaton sisältö

  • Sisältää materiaalia, joka on loukkaavaa, herjaavaa, rasistista, uhkailevaa tai ahdistelevaa.

  • Materiaali sisältää nimiä, yhteystietoja tai muita henkilökohtaisia tietoja. Julkisuuden henkilöistä, julkisissa viroissa toimivista ihmisistä sekä yritysten vastuuhenkilöistä saa keskustella työhön liittyen. Myös yksityiselämään liittyvistä asioista voi keskustella siltä osin, kuin niistä on julkisesti kerrottu.

  • Sisältää lapsille haitallista tai heiltä kiellettyä materiaalia. Seksuaalinen sisältö on sallittua aiheeseen tarkoitetuilla palstoilla, joiden ikäraja on 18 vuotta.

  • Lainvastaista sisältöä voi olla mm. yksityiselämää loukkaavan tiedon levitys, kiihottaminen kansanryhmää vastaan, laiton uhkaaminen, alaikäisiin liittyvä seksuaalinen sisältö/grooming, petokset, identiteettivarkaudet, kunnianloukkaukset ja tekijänoikeusrikkomukset.

  • Sisältö ei liity palstan tai keskusteluketjun aiheeseen.

  • Viesti ei ole suomea tai ruotsia (pl. International Forums), se sisältää mainontaa, se sisältää tekijänoikeuksin suojattua materiaalia, se on massapostitus tai jokin muu syy.

Jaa keskustelu