http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2007/02/139613.php
http://www.viewimages.com/Search.aspx?mid=52973826&epmid=1&partner=Google
http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/images/torture.jpg
Hillary Clinton for Prez? You've Got to Be Kidding!
Earthside Comments: 'Keep a permanent U.S. military presence in Iraq ... because of oil and Israel. That's not just Richard Bruce Cheney's policy position -- that's a Hillary Clinton proclaimation, too.
Can you believe there are actually Dimocrats supporting Clinton for president? Why? Just because of her gender?
We've said it before: if she wins the nomination, it will demonstrate that the Dimocrat Party is soulless.
Link: Clinton Says Some G.I.’s in Iraq Would Remain | New York Times
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton foresees a “remaining military as well as political mission” in Iraq, and says that if elected president, she would keep a reduced military force there to fight Al Qaeda, deter Iranian aggression, protect the Kurds and possibly support the Iraqi military. ...
... In outlining how she would handle Iraq as commander in chief, Mrs. Clinton articulated a more nuanced position than the one she has provided at her campaign events, where she has backed the goal of “bringing the troops home.”
She said in the interview that there were “remaining vital national security interests in Iraq” that would require a continuing deployment of American troops.
The United States’ security would be undermined if parts of Iraq turned into a failed state “that serves as a petri dish for insurgents and Al Qaeda,” she said. “It is right in the heart of the oil region,” she said. “It is directly in opposition to our interests, to the interests of regimes, to Israel’s interests.”
http://www.earthside.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/03/19/hillary_clinton_2.jpg
Siionimi tyrannia, Bushin meno jatkuisi Hillarynkin johtamana!
http://www.viewimages.com/Search.aspx?mid=52973826&epmid=1&partner=Google
http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/images/torture.jpg
Hillary Clinton for Prez? You've Got to Be Kidding!
Earthside Comments: 'Keep a permanent U.S. military presence in Iraq ... because of oil and Israel. That's not just Richard Bruce Cheney's policy position -- that's a Hillary Clinton proclaimation, too.
Can you believe there are actually Dimocrats supporting Clinton for president? Why? Just because of her gender?
We've said it before: if she wins the nomination, it will demonstrate that the Dimocrat Party is soulless.
Link: Clinton Says Some G.I.’s in Iraq Would Remain | New York Times
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton foresees a “remaining military as well as political mission” in Iraq, and says that if elected president, she would keep a reduced military force there to fight Al Qaeda, deter Iranian aggression, protect the Kurds and possibly support the Iraqi military. ...
... In outlining how she would handle Iraq as commander in chief, Mrs. Clinton articulated a more nuanced position than the one she has provided at her campaign events, where she has backed the goal of “bringing the troops home.”
She said in the interview that there were “remaining vital national security interests in Iraq” that would require a continuing deployment of American troops.
The United States’ security would be undermined if parts of Iraq turned into a failed state “that serves as a petri dish for insurgents and Al Qaeda,” she said. “It is right in the heart of the oil region,” she said. “It is directly in opposition to our interests, to the interests of regimes, to Israel’s interests.”
http://www.earthside.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/03/19/hillary_clinton_2.jpg
Siionimi tyrannia, Bushin meno jatkuisi Hillarynkin johtamana!
Vastaukset 1
Vanhimmat
Osa oikeistosta Suomessa on ottanut pyhäksi maakseen USA:n... Järjetöntä, mikähän tuon idea sitten on selityksiä lienee tilanteen ja typpistä vaihdelle erilaisia. Tulee mieleen, että onko ”lonkeroita” ollut siinä määrin että on USA:sta tehty pyhä ja nyt se on itsestään selvyys, muutenhan on KOMMUNISTI ja sitten loput on aivopesty. Vaikeata sanoo.
Väyrynen arvioimassa, että täytyy lähettää joukkoja Afganistanin, koska USA antaa sille suuren arvon... olla USA:n mieliksi sama näytelmä toiseen suuntaan ja sama ihminen vielä...
:)
No he kantavat vastuun epäonnistumisia ei saa tulla.