Vast. ottaja: UM
MUISTIO
No heipä hei!
Kuten muutama vuosi sitten jo soittelin sinne UM:ään, niin olen joutunut oikaisemaan aika ajoin julkisessa sanassa Suomen oikeusjärjestelmää koskevia lausuntoja. Oikaisu ei auheuta toimenpiteitä; oikeusministeriö on valehdellut lausunnossaan.
Annettu lausunto ei perustu tutkimukseen, vaan tilastolliseen tulkintaan. Asian tutkiminen ja tilastojen tulkitseminen ovat kaksi eri asiaa. Kun tilastot syntyvät 'pässien' työn tuloksena, niin virhe on tilasto. Tilastoa tulkittaessa sokea yrittää kehua toista sokeaa. Yhdessä he sokeina kehuvat sitä miten kaunista on nähdä.
Koska Suomessa vallitsee sensuuri, niin asiaa ei voida julkistaa tai oikaista Suomen rajojen sisäpuolella.
Toivottavasti kehitetty vastalääke (so. lain analysointi) toimii, ennenkuin Suomi muodostaa vielä suuremman turvallisuusuhan ja suoran sodan uhan ympäristölle.
'Vikkuvikainen (?)' valtio aloittelevan tutkijan kannalta.
-- --
PRESS BULLETIN - MEMO
19 September 2003 ver 1.1
MINISTRY OF JUSTICE GIVING MISLEADING FALSE STATEMENTS
Finland - An academic representative from Ministry of Justice have given false misleading statement on Finnish Court and Legal System functional capabilities on September 19th 2003. This is very like to be because of the nature(*) of a man, and her academic(*) skills. Unlike her statement claimed, the Finnish Legal System or Ministry is not functional.
Based on small analyze (ISBN 951-98052-2-2) ran on government, Ministry's statement is based on either lies, or false and faked information. This may be result of such missing factors like personal capability to understand relative issues without common sense(**) as well as human behavior pattern generally speaking(**).
Part of academically educated people in Finland are not able to understand, that they are not able to understand something without understanding lacking of understand in general understanding. Thus statements given by these people may be exposed to a clarification on word 'academic'(*).
Statements given by women in a leading government position should not be counted, at least based on research done on warfare, and under circumstances related to ruling(***). Women think differently, and have been proved to be not suitable persons to ran warfare.
Personal and educational matters may prevent these people to think as widely as they would be expected to do, since most Finnish University educated people lack common sense.
Besides, most Finnish women lack in self respect, and these people can not admit their lost.
Finland do not have functional police and legal system.
My apologies on the behalf of some extreme having spoken against her better knowledge. Practice always beast theory, since no theory without practice and practice prima. I am asking You to reverse ever idea Finnish University graduate explained in public mass media. One Soviet Union's intelligence advice was to tell and document everything vice versa (to those working fro Russia) was to tell and document everything vice versa; II WW documentation have party written in this style, and part of these people's speech reflect the same technique still to be in use.
Åke Tyvi
Adult Engineering Student
(*) Academic adj. ...3. theoretical; not practical, realistic, or directly useful... 4. learned or scholarly but lacking in wordiness, common sense, common sense, or practically. 5. conforming to set rules, standards, or traditions; conventional... (*)
Random House, Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language, Gramercy Books, Random House Value Publishing Inc: United States (1996), ISBN 0-517-15141-3.
(**) Wehter's books on war psychology, and his theories on human psyche.
(***)E.g. studies made in UK resulting to sanction women from front line.
-- --
Draft Copy of a Work Memo
'LaVM 31/2002 vp' taking place January 1st 2004 and its planned becoming alleviations
This article is a draft script based on a memo sent to Parliament Constitutional Committee on the 21st of August in 2003 on the becoming Police and Enforcement Act taking place on January 1st 2004 in Finland.
Parliament's free copy of 'LaVM 31/2002 vp' can be downloaded from Parliament's site at www.eduskunta.fi, in case anyone calls this memorandum into a question. See the detailed instructions how to do this from the bottom of this page in case You are interested in, or have any doubts of this presentation, its expertise or content. All references incl. the reference material is mentioned at bottom of this page (excl. ISBN 951-98052-2-2), and you are able to verify all references.
Citations from implicit explanatory memorandum assigned to Parliament's Constitutional committee can be found from this text to make it more clear. Further explanations and grounds are situated below each citation. The actual memo to committee is shorter due to the implicit explanatory implemented into this article. If You did not quite got it at your first read attempt, them to make in a common language 'I rewrote the memo to foreigners so, that it is easy to read and follow'.
"MEMORANDUM ADDRESSED TO THE NAMED PERSONS IN THE PARLIAMENT CONSTITUTIONAL COMMITTEE
August 21, 2003
Why Finland is not a democracy, and why ruling is not done in a democratic way?
Those having presented the new Police and Enforcement Act on the behalf of Ministry of Justice have not heard a single Finnish citizen while this new Act were prepared. It is very like to be the case again, that the same members on government post previously trying to usurp more power to themselves, are behind this effort in collecting too higher authorization and access privileges into citizen's private life and property.
When taking a closer look of this Act's presentation and validation process, there is no doubt, that those found guilty for this act would be no one else than Finnish Government Lawyers, who have made an remarkable effort in gaining even more authorization to themselves. And based on what kind of an educational level? (1) Even some institutes make more qualified student's, when compared to some Finnish Universities."
The presenting officer of 'LaVM 31/2002 vp' is Mr. Jan Törnqvist (tel. 358.9.1825.7700), who works as a Legislation Manager for the Ministry of Justice.
Ministry of Justice released a bulletin titled [Better qualification for the Police in solving out serious crimes] "Poliisille paremmat edellytykset selvittää törkeitä rikoksia" on June 26th in 2003.
When analysing the bulletin content and its construct, a professional can easily pin-point few thinks to make a remark;
a) The whole document is written one sided. No possibility of misinterpretation is being handled. No anti-theory is given.
b) Abuse-cases are ignored, still police authorization is increased.
c) The bulletin is using very dangerous expressions and misleading language, which are revealing the true motive for making this Act and twisting people's need for this law. Expressions used in this bulletin are next to propaganda. For example the bulletin is using an expression [... by which means the new Enforcement authority have promoted individual's and society's security...] "... millä tavoin uudet pakkokeinovaltuuden ovat edistäneet yksilön ja yhteiskunnan turvallisuutta ...". For those knowing how Police and Lawyers interpret the present Police and Enforcement law, the previously told sentence might sound next to "... how well we have managed to ruin Human Rights...". Ministry of Justice talks about 'toning town' the Enforcement Act in the context of making easing the punishment to a citizen. Personally I think this kind of writing style and attitude reveals hidden sadism, and possibly even personality disorder. Bulletin really gets carried away, when it says 'Making this change is for securing the defendant's presence at court', which means arresting people based on doubts. I suppose the final joke in this Ministry's bulletin is saying 'toning down the prerequisites for committing a house search to a person under a crime suspect, and preconditions to order restraint on alienation or confiscating property'. Practically these changes means there are no longer justice or law - Finland has turned into a true Police State were people have no legal rights.
Any Law is not worth of making until people using it do not twist its true meaning or authorization. Unfortunately Jan Törngvist is either not aware of the field facts, or alternatively has been making this presentation to support some dark political ideology aiming either to a Complete Police State or some State ideologically next to Nazism. I may say so based on the authorization given to some officials in 'LaVM 31/2002 vp', when compared their capability to use such an enormous authorization. Based on happened field facts I am entitled to say these things. People having read only statistics on high government post are not aware of the real field facts.
Old Police and Enforcement Act authorization have been interpret to benefit the aims of Police Force Commissioners, and the Law is being widely misinterpret. When the new Police and Enforcement Act will take place on January 1st 2004, then this State may easily turn or can be turned into a other kind of a Nazi-Germany. New 'LaVM 31/2002 vp' and present '450/1987 Pakkokeinolaki' are like walking on a knife's edge - once You have slipped, there is no return. And we already have slipped...
I would like to make clear to foreign Lawyers and member of Police Force reading this article, that I am not questioning the need of having Police Force in taking care of some basic issues in society. This article is to point out your place and clarify your task in society. This applies directly to The Finnish Police and Lawyers, and some part of this text may or may not be applied to your way of taking care Police matters. Basically we are talking about Finland as a sample case.
Here are some new 'toning downs' of 'LaVM 31/2002 vp':
MUISTIO
No heipä hei!
Kuten muutama vuosi sitten jo soittelin sinne UM:ään, niin olen joutunut oikaisemaan aika ajoin julkisessa sanassa Suomen oikeusjärjestelmää koskevia lausuntoja. Oikaisu ei auheuta toimenpiteitä; oikeusministeriö on valehdellut lausunnossaan.
Annettu lausunto ei perustu tutkimukseen, vaan tilastolliseen tulkintaan. Asian tutkiminen ja tilastojen tulkitseminen ovat kaksi eri asiaa. Kun tilastot syntyvät 'pässien' työn tuloksena, niin virhe on tilasto. Tilastoa tulkittaessa sokea yrittää kehua toista sokeaa. Yhdessä he sokeina kehuvat sitä miten kaunista on nähdä.
Koska Suomessa vallitsee sensuuri, niin asiaa ei voida julkistaa tai oikaista Suomen rajojen sisäpuolella.
Toivottavasti kehitetty vastalääke (so. lain analysointi) toimii, ennenkuin Suomi muodostaa vielä suuremman turvallisuusuhan ja suoran sodan uhan ympäristölle.
'Vikkuvikainen (?)' valtio aloittelevan tutkijan kannalta.
-- --
PRESS BULLETIN - MEMO
19 September 2003 ver 1.1
MINISTRY OF JUSTICE GIVING MISLEADING FALSE STATEMENTS
Finland - An academic representative from Ministry of Justice have given false misleading statement on Finnish Court and Legal System functional capabilities on September 19th 2003. This is very like to be because of the nature(*) of a man, and her academic(*) skills. Unlike her statement claimed, the Finnish Legal System or Ministry is not functional.
Based on small analyze (ISBN 951-98052-2-2) ran on government, Ministry's statement is based on either lies, or false and faked information. This may be result of such missing factors like personal capability to understand relative issues without common sense(**) as well as human behavior pattern generally speaking(**).
Part of academically educated people in Finland are not able to understand, that they are not able to understand something without understanding lacking of understand in general understanding. Thus statements given by these people may be exposed to a clarification on word 'academic'(*).
Statements given by women in a leading government position should not be counted, at least based on research done on warfare, and under circumstances related to ruling(***). Women think differently, and have been proved to be not suitable persons to ran warfare.
Personal and educational matters may prevent these people to think as widely as they would be expected to do, since most Finnish University educated people lack common sense.
Besides, most Finnish women lack in self respect, and these people can not admit their lost.
Finland do not have functional police and legal system.
My apologies on the behalf of some extreme having spoken against her better knowledge. Practice always beast theory, since no theory without practice and practice prima. I am asking You to reverse ever idea Finnish University graduate explained in public mass media. One Soviet Union's intelligence advice was to tell and document everything vice versa (to those working fro Russia) was to tell and document everything vice versa; II WW documentation have party written in this style, and part of these people's speech reflect the same technique still to be in use.
Åke Tyvi
Adult Engineering Student
(*) Academic adj. ...3. theoretical; not practical, realistic, or directly useful... 4. learned or scholarly but lacking in wordiness, common sense, common sense, or practically. 5. conforming to set rules, standards, or traditions; conventional... (*)
Random House, Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language, Gramercy Books, Random House Value Publishing Inc: United States (1996), ISBN 0-517-15141-3.
(**) Wehter's books on war psychology, and his theories on human psyche.
(***)E.g. studies made in UK resulting to sanction women from front line.
-- --
Draft Copy of a Work Memo
'LaVM 31/2002 vp' taking place January 1st 2004 and its planned becoming alleviations
This article is a draft script based on a memo sent to Parliament Constitutional Committee on the 21st of August in 2003 on the becoming Police and Enforcement Act taking place on January 1st 2004 in Finland.
Parliament's free copy of 'LaVM 31/2002 vp' can be downloaded from Parliament's site at www.eduskunta.fi, in case anyone calls this memorandum into a question. See the detailed instructions how to do this from the bottom of this page in case You are interested in, or have any doubts of this presentation, its expertise or content. All references incl. the reference material is mentioned at bottom of this page (excl. ISBN 951-98052-2-2), and you are able to verify all references.
Citations from implicit explanatory memorandum assigned to Parliament's Constitutional committee can be found from this text to make it more clear. Further explanations and grounds are situated below each citation. The actual memo to committee is shorter due to the implicit explanatory implemented into this article. If You did not quite got it at your first read attempt, them to make in a common language 'I rewrote the memo to foreigners so, that it is easy to read and follow'.
"MEMORANDUM ADDRESSED TO THE NAMED PERSONS IN THE PARLIAMENT CONSTITUTIONAL COMMITTEE
August 21, 2003
Why Finland is not a democracy, and why ruling is not done in a democratic way?
Those having presented the new Police and Enforcement Act on the behalf of Ministry of Justice have not heard a single Finnish citizen while this new Act were prepared. It is very like to be the case again, that the same members on government post previously trying to usurp more power to themselves, are behind this effort in collecting too higher authorization and access privileges into citizen's private life and property.
When taking a closer look of this Act's presentation and validation process, there is no doubt, that those found guilty for this act would be no one else than Finnish Government Lawyers, who have made an remarkable effort in gaining even more authorization to themselves. And based on what kind of an educational level? (1) Even some institutes make more qualified student's, when compared to some Finnish Universities."
The presenting officer of 'LaVM 31/2002 vp' is Mr. Jan Törnqvist (tel. 358.9.1825.7700), who works as a Legislation Manager for the Ministry of Justice.
Ministry of Justice released a bulletin titled [Better qualification for the Police in solving out serious crimes] "Poliisille paremmat edellytykset selvittää törkeitä rikoksia" on June 26th in 2003.
When analysing the bulletin content and its construct, a professional can easily pin-point few thinks to make a remark;
a) The whole document is written one sided. No possibility of misinterpretation is being handled. No anti-theory is given.
b) Abuse-cases are ignored, still police authorization is increased.
c) The bulletin is using very dangerous expressions and misleading language, which are revealing the true motive for making this Act and twisting people's need for this law. Expressions used in this bulletin are next to propaganda. For example the bulletin is using an expression [... by which means the new Enforcement authority have promoted individual's and society's security...] "... millä tavoin uudet pakkokeinovaltuuden ovat edistäneet yksilön ja yhteiskunnan turvallisuutta ...". For those knowing how Police and Lawyers interpret the present Police and Enforcement law, the previously told sentence might sound next to "... how well we have managed to ruin Human Rights...". Ministry of Justice talks about 'toning town' the Enforcement Act in the context of making easing the punishment to a citizen. Personally I think this kind of writing style and attitude reveals hidden sadism, and possibly even personality disorder. Bulletin really gets carried away, when it says 'Making this change is for securing the defendant's presence at court', which means arresting people based on doubts. I suppose the final joke in this Ministry's bulletin is saying 'toning down the prerequisites for committing a house search to a person under a crime suspect, and preconditions to order restraint on alienation or confiscating property'. Practically these changes means there are no longer justice or law - Finland has turned into a true Police State were people have no legal rights.
Any Law is not worth of making until people using it do not twist its true meaning or authorization. Unfortunately Jan Törngvist is either not aware of the field facts, or alternatively has been making this presentation to support some dark political ideology aiming either to a Complete Police State or some State ideologically next to Nazism. I may say so based on the authorization given to some officials in 'LaVM 31/2002 vp', when compared their capability to use such an enormous authorization. Based on happened field facts I am entitled to say these things. People having read only statistics on high government post are not aware of the real field facts.
Old Police and Enforcement Act authorization have been interpret to benefit the aims of Police Force Commissioners, and the Law is being widely misinterpret. When the new Police and Enforcement Act will take place on January 1st 2004, then this State may easily turn or can be turned into a other kind of a Nazi-Germany. New 'LaVM 31/2002 vp' and present '450/1987 Pakkokeinolaki' are like walking on a knife's edge - once You have slipped, there is no return. And we already have slipped...
I would like to make clear to foreign Lawyers and member of Police Force reading this article, that I am not questioning the need of having Police Force in taking care of some basic issues in society. This article is to point out your place and clarify your task in society. This applies directly to The Finnish Police and Lawyers, and some part of this text may or may not be applied to your way of taking care Police matters. Basically we are talking about Finland as a sample case.
Here are some new 'toning downs' of 'LaVM 31/2002 vp':
Vastaukset
Vanhimmat
Ei vielä vastauksia
Aloittaja odottaa vastauksia. Kerro oma näkemyksesi ensimmäisenä.