http://www.autozeitung.de/auto-vergleichstest/porsche-gegen-audi-teil-1-audi-rs5-gegen-porsche-911-carrera-s
Audi RS5 myös alitti tehtaan ilmoittaman 0-100 kiihtyvyyden. Ilmoitettu on 4,6s ja RS5 meni 4,3s.
Audi RS5 myös alitti tehtaan ilmoittaman 0-100 kiihtyvyyden. Ilmoitettu on 4,6s ja RS5 meni 4,3s.
Vastaukset 17
Vanhimmat
suoritus. Vertailun vuoksi esimerkiksi BMW M3 jäi reilusti ilmoitetusta 4,7 s lukemasta
http://www.autozeitung.de/vergleichstest/sportwagen-bmw-m3-coupe-gegen-audi-tt-rs
RS5 kiihtyy oikeasti lähes 1 sekunnin nopeammin kuin M3, se on paljon se. Audi hallitsee tätäkin autoluokkaa tuttuun tapaan ja muut tulevat perässä. Tämä hetken malleista RS6, RS5 ja TT RS ovat selkeästi omien luokkiensa parhaat.
Hyvä homma!
Ja pesee Mesen vielä selvemmin. W123 korinen Mersu 2-litran diesel koneella 0-100 km/h 29,4 sek. Eli Audi pesee Mesen 25,1 sekunnilla. Se vasta on paljon se!
Täällä.. Että se on mitä testiä haluaakin sitte jokainen katsoa :D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaYKSd6q6ps
että 0-60 mph ei ole sama kuin 0-100 km/h?. RS5 kiihtyy silti 0-100 kovempaa kuin M3 0-60 mph, eli RS5 on aika rutkasti nopeampi kuin M3. Menkääs BMW-pojut nyt takaisin sinne mistä olette tulleetkin.
62 mailia on 100kmh!
Toiseksi toi rs vetää nopeenpaa sinne nelikon takia, radalla se esimerkiksi jää, ja kaikki mitä kertuu 100kmh jälkeen. Tehohäviö nelikonvuoksi alkaa vaikuttaan vasta sielä, 0-40kmh se vaan aittaa pinkasemaan.
Mutta tossa testissä bmw alitti lupaamansa... Siitähän oli kyse, eikös ole hienoa?
mutta laitetaan sille suoralle yksi mutka niin...
...no kyllähän te tiedätte, understeer understeer...
ainakin tiedetään että RS Audit jättää M Bemut monella sekunnilla radalla.
Juu, Audihan oikein tunnetaan ajo-ominaisuuksistaan...
http://img158.imageshack.us/img158/8991/tripgj9.swf
Audit ovat parempia ajaa kuin Bemarit, siihen ei edes sinun provopellen itku auta. Valitan.
asfaltilla, on testejä miljoonia mitä voisi laittaa missä audin ajettavuutta moitittu mutkiin... Ei toki r8 mallia.
Vrrrrrrrr On tuttu kuvaus audin mutkiin ajettavuudesta, toi ääni taas kuvastaa eturenkaita...
http://www.germancarforum.com/internal-combustion/27840-powercar-audi-rs6-vs-bmw-m5.html
Audi on 1,5s nopeampi per kierros kuin BMW, sekä Audi alittaa reilusti tehtaan ilmoittaman 0-100 kiihtyvyyden.
http://www.sportauto-online.de/vergleichstest/audi-tt-gegen-bmw-z4-bavarian-open-1037055.html
Jopa etuveto TT jättää radalla tehokkaamman BMW:n.
http://www.sportauto-online.de/vergleichstest/bmw-335i-gegen-audi-s4-mittelklassen-sechszylinder-im-duell-1037101.html
Taas BMW on reilusti hitaampi Hockenheimilla kuin Audi.
Niin ja uusi RS5 on nyrrellä 6,5s nopeampi kuin M3.
Vieläkö haluat esimerkkejä?
A4 still can't quite match the all-conquering 3-series in terms of raw dynamic appeal. There's plenty of grip to exploit, but messages through the steering wheel about how close you're getting to the limits feel muted.
Audi A4 – Fifth Gear
---
But it was the handling that disappointed us the most. Absolutely wonderful up to about eight-tenths – the car hanging on superbly on good or bad surfaces alike – the Audi feels ponderously nose-heavy when you go that extra step. Despite the standard stability control, the S4 doesn’t do anything but understeer once the grip limits have been breached. And understeer a surprising amount, too. There is little throttle control – the chassis is as wooden as the steering - and all that you can do is reduce the throttle opening to allow front-end grip to be re-established.
Audi S4 – AutoSpeed
---
But throw a few tight turns and some committed cornering into the equation and the Cabriolet comes over all whale-like. The steering is typically Audi - stodgy and lifeless - and the chassis has only one party trick; terminal understeer.
Audi A4 Cabriolet V6 – Evo
---
An experienced driver will find typical Audi understeer at the limit.
Audi S4 Cabriolet - Straight Six.com
---
Keen drivers will be disappointed by the lifeless steering.
Audi A6 - What Car?
---
The Audi is a letdown with its lifeless steering and excessive understeer at the limit. The A8L does not match the Maserati's level of roadholding, nor is it as entertaining.
Audi A8L - Automobile Magazine
---
The Audi TT has never quite hit the spot. It's quick, grippy and has a chunky, high-quality appeal, but the heavy, lifeless steering, understeery balance and effective but charisma-free 1.8-litre turbocharged engine have always marked it down as an also-ran for those who put dynamics ahead of prestige. Even the more sonorous 3.2 V6 TT doesn't quite live up to the promise of its billing as a compact, driver-focused, 250bhp, four-wheel-drive coupe.
Audi TT - evo
---
I've driven fast Audis before, and I've always been impressed by the amount of grunt available, and the way it's so easy to reach license-threatening speeds.
But I've also found as drivers' cars, they usually fall wide of the mark with lifeless steering and lacking the involvement you get with the BMW M3.
Audi RS4 - AutoTrader -
---
Unfortunately, all of these are slightly blunted by Audi’s fabulously precise but lifeless steering.
While it weighs up nicely going into corners and feels really sharp, it doesn’t give you a clue about how much grip you’ve got left.
Audi A3 - Star Motoring
---
however the Audi features quattro four-wheel-drive - making it a grippy contender. That doesn’t translate to the most rewarding drive here though, for while the Audi is undoubtedly swift and accomplished, it all feels a bit detached and clinical on the road.
Audi A3 - MSN cars
---
Should I buy one?
The S5’s case takes a bit of a dive when it comes to money. Nice although it is, it’s going to have serious difficulty justifying itself next to the considerably cheaper BMW 335i Coupe, which is almost as fast, far more practical and still better to drive.
Buyers looking for value will therefore have to cast their eyes further down the A5 range; those looking for the best driving coupe of this size, on the other hand, need look no further than the alternative offered by Audi's old Munich rival.
Audi A5 - Autocar
---
Assets
Quality and solidity, sumptuous cabin, big boot, gutsy 3.0 TDI engine, effective Multitronic transmission.
Drawbacks
Feels nose heavy despite new chassis design, unresolved styling, poor rear-seat room.
Verdict
Lacks a clear personality. Competent in many ways but could have been so much better.
Audi A6 - 4 Car from channel 4
---
To the traditional constituency of Audi fashionistas I imagine it will prove to be a very appealing product.
But what I cannot see it doing is persuading those to whom driving pleasure matters very much to forsake their BMWs for it. A 335i coupé is perhaps a little slower, but only a fool presumes that speed and fun are always the same.
Audi S5 – The Times
---
And so the A5 is indeed a good drive.
But it lacks the sparkle that all these smiling men should have given it.
Design first: yes, there are some great details (get those magical LED running lights, like luminous mascara). But it looks like it's sagging in the middle, and the big ol' Audi grille still doesn't do it for me.
Engines: yup, mark those up to a win. The V6 feels like has deeper lungs than a BMW three-litre, and it's a lot smoother than Merc's V6. The V6 diesel is a bit of a triumph too.
And the chassis has nice accurate new steering. But all-new layout or not, the A5 corners like an old-school Audi. Gentle but unavoidable understeer, little sense of fun, no tweakability at the limit. Audi keeps telling us they make sporty cars, but in the chassis department, they don't really. Fast, easy to drive hard, but not inspiring.
So put Walter's Latin emotion on hold. This is still a bit of a po-faced car.
Audi A5 – Top Gear
---
Unfortunately the TT's steering is lacking in any real feel, in an attempt to isolate feedback no doubt, but it is well weighted. Driven hard, the TT is a good companion, with good body and wheel control, and it is not too uncomfortable either. The structure didn't feel as rigid as in the Nissan 350Z (though that car has a rear strut brace where passengers might sit), and the TT certainly doesn't provide the same pure driving experience a rear-wheel drive car can.
Audi TT - www.carenthusisast.com
---
Even with a 4.2 litre 450bhp twin-turbo V8 it can’t match more charismatic offerings from BMW, Jaguar and Mercedes. But don’t dismiss the Audi, being bland is not the same as being bad. The A6 is not a bad car.
Putting a 4.2 litre V8 in a car this size should be a recipe for fun but the extra weight and the lifeless steering conspire to produce a car that is less than the sum of its parts.
Audi A6 - The Times online
---
No question, this A4 is an improvement over the old in terms of engine refinement, ride, handling, packaging, fuel economy and feature availability. Yet it’s hard to avoid concluding that this car is not enough of a step forward over the old A4, especially as Audi has gone to the expense of developing a new platform for it.
It is not good enough to topple the 3-series, and in many respects, such as its driving position, handling and the weighting of its controls, it is inferior to the cheaper Ford Mondeo.
Audi A4 - Autocar
on nopeampi kuin BMW radalla. Se että kopioit jotain ikivanhoja tekstejä ei todista mitään, mutta ne laittamani linkit kierrosaikoineen todistaa Audin paremmuuden. Itke poika itke, ehkä se katkeruus helpottaa.
Audi on nopeampi, se on fakta.
Mitä tommoset vakioautot, taitaa rataLada pestä molemmat..Hitaita radalla kumpikin merkki, eiks noi ole tarkoitettu siviililiikenteeseen?? Paljonko sä ite kierrät rataa?? Mä ainakin ajelen maantiellä ja takaan että mun vekotin pesee noi molemmat sekä kiihtyvyydessä että nopeudessa.
Mistä kyse olikin :D
Lyödään BMW 335i:n JB4, katittomat piiput, välijäähdytin niin n 3 x kalliimpi RS5 jää nuolemaan näppejään ;)