Mutaatio

Asiantuntijat toteavat juuri päinvastaista kuin mitä väitit. Ei ole mitään todisteita sille että maailman tiedemiehet kallistuisivat sille kannalle ettei mikro johda makroon, päinvastoin. Katsontaanpa mitä asiantuntijat asiasta todella sanovat:

"Contrary to this belief among the anti-evolution movement proponents, evolution of life forms beyond the species level ("macroevolution", i.e. speciation in a specific case) has indeed been observed multiple times under both controlled laboratory conditions and in nature. The claim that macroevolution does not occur, or is impossible, is thus demonstrably false and without support in the scientific community."

"Such claims are rejected by the scientific community on the basis of ample evidence that macroevolution is an active process both presently and in the past. The terms macroevolution and microevolution relate to the same processes operating at different scales, but creationist claims misuse the terms in a vaguely defined way which does not accurately reflect scientific usage, acknowledging well observed evolution as "microevolution" and denying that "macroevolution" takes place"

"While details of macroevolution are continuously studied by the scientific community, the overall theory behind macroevolution (i.e. common descent) has been overwhelmingly consistent with empirical data. Predictions of empirical data from the theory of common descent have been so consistent that biologists often refer to it as the "fact of evolution".

Lähde: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macroevolution#Misuse

"The attempt to differentiate between microevolution and macroevolution is considered to have no scientific basis by any mainstream scientific organization, including the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Contrary to belief among the anti-evolution movement proponents, evolution of life forms beyond the species level ("macroevolution", i.e. speciation) has indeed been observed and documented by scientists on numerous occasions."

"The claim that microevolution is qualitatively different from macroevolution is wrong, as the main difference between the two processes is that one occurs within a few generations, whilst the other takes place over thousands of years (i.e. a quantitative difference). Essentially they describe the same process; although evolution beyond the species level results in beginning and ending generations which could not interbreed, the intermediate generations could. Even changes in the number of chromosomes can be accounted for by intermediate stages in which a single chromosome divides in generational stages, or multiple chromosomes fuse. A well documented example is the chromosome difference between humans and great apes."

Lähde: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microevolution#Misuse

Lukemattomat kärpäsillä ja bakteereilla ynnä tehdyt kokeet sekä muut empiiriset havainnot osoittavat makroevoluution siis olevan olennainen osa nykybiologiaa ja elämän kehittymistä. Väitteellesi, että tiedemiehet joutuisivat toteamaan makroevoluution mahdottomuuden, ei ole mitään linkitettäviä todisteita. Game over, kreationistit.