Hyviä kuvia ja jännä artikkeli on täällä:
http://origins.swau.edu/papers/man/hominid/default.html
" APES, APEMEN AND MEN.
A Creationist perspective
Ó 1998 Lee A. Spencer, Ph.D.
...
The fossil hominid crania show a gradation of
morphologies between those
characteristics seen in the apes but not in
humans, to those
characteristics seen in humans but not in apes.
There is also a gradation
in endocranial volume. Similarly , the postcranial
skeletons of the
hominids exhibit many characteristics that are
intermediate, as well as a
mixture of other characteristics that are either
ape-like or
human-like. Therefore, it is difficult to maintain
the position that
there are no morphological intermediates between
apes and man. So what
explanation for the existence of fossil
intermediates can we posit other
than evolution from a common ancestor, an
explanation that is
falsified by the order of appearance of various
features in various
lineages? With the introduction of the
phylogenetic systematic
methodology, there are no unfalsified hypotheses
of human evolutionary
lineages. An explanation that is consistent with
the data and with the
Biblical account of origins is that man has been
engaged in exchanging
genetic material with the pongids, either in
nature or in the laboratory.
The variety of forms can be attributed to some
form of reticulation
wherein the original creatures outcrossed to both
H. sapiens and pongids,
as well as interbreeding within their own group."
------
Tämän nojalla kreationistin mukaan fossiilit
näyttää ,että ihminen ja apina risteytyivät. Siis
olivat "same kind" eli
"samaa baraminia" esim. Leisolan
"Evoluutio-kriittinen analyysi" kirjan
tarkoittamassa mielessä !
Itse asiassa yhteisen evolutiivisen alkuperän
vaikutelma on niin ilmeinen ,että vain
Raamatulla saapi vaivoin torjuttua tämän ilmeisen
johtopäätöksen ;);)
terv. Mr.K.A.T.
http://origins.swau.edu/papers/man/hominid/default.html
" APES, APEMEN AND MEN.
A Creationist perspective
Ó 1998 Lee A. Spencer, Ph.D.
...
The fossil hominid crania show a gradation of
morphologies between those
characteristics seen in the apes but not in
humans, to those
characteristics seen in humans but not in apes.
There is also a gradation
in endocranial volume. Similarly , the postcranial
skeletons of the
hominids exhibit many characteristics that are
intermediate, as well as a
mixture of other characteristics that are either
ape-like or
human-like. Therefore, it is difficult to maintain
the position that
there are no morphological intermediates between
apes and man. So what
explanation for the existence of fossil
intermediates can we posit other
than evolution from a common ancestor, an
explanation that is
falsified by the order of appearance of various
features in various
lineages? With the introduction of the
phylogenetic systematic
methodology, there are no unfalsified hypotheses
of human evolutionary
lineages. An explanation that is consistent with
the data and with the
Biblical account of origins is that man has been
engaged in exchanging
genetic material with the pongids, either in
nature or in the laboratory.
The variety of forms can be attributed to some
form of reticulation
wherein the original creatures outcrossed to both
H. sapiens and pongids,
as well as interbreeding within their own group."
------
Tämän nojalla kreationistin mukaan fossiilit
näyttää ,että ihminen ja apina risteytyivät. Siis
olivat "same kind" eli
"samaa baraminia" esim. Leisolan
"Evoluutio-kriittinen analyysi" kirjan
tarkoittamassa mielessä !
Itse asiassa yhteisen evolutiivisen alkuperän
vaikutelma on niin ilmeinen ,että vain
Raamatulla saapi vaivoin torjuttua tämän ilmeisen
johtopäätöksen ;);)
terv. Mr.K.A.T.
Vastaukset 1
Vanhimmat
Onko sinulla jonkinlainen henkilökohtainen
mielenkiinto tällaiseen oksettavaan asiaan?