Tätäkin on käytetty argumenttina evoluutiota ja luonnonvalintaa vastaan, mutta taustalta ei yllätys yllätys paljastunutkaan älykästä suunnittelua tai kertaluomista.
"Mystery of the flatfish head solved"
Those delicious flatfishes, like halibut and sole, are also evolutionary puzzles. Their profoundly asymmetrical heads have one of the most unusual body plans among all backboned animals (vertebrates) but the evolution of their bizarre anatomy has long been a mystery. How did flatfishes, with both of their eyes on one side of their head, evolve? So puzzling was the anatomy of flounders and their kin that they were used in early arguments against Darwin and his theory of natural selection. Skeptics wondered how such unusual features could have slowly evolved whilst remaining advantageous for the fishes' survival.
"This fossil comes from Bolca in northern Italy, a site that has literally been mined for hundreds of years for its fossil fishes. This remarkable site provides a snapshot of an early coral reef assemblage. Reefs are well known as biodiversity hotspots, so it is perhaps not surprising that Bolca provides us with the first evidence of many modern fish groups," said Friedman. "Our understanding of the relationships of some of these groups is in a state of change with the increasing influx of molecular genetic studies. Fossils have not contributed very much to this debate, but specimens like that of Heteronectes reveal the superb level of detail that can be extracted from extinct species."
"This is a profound discovery which clearly shows that intermediate fossil forms, which according to certain creationist theories shouldn't exist, are regularly turning up as scientists keep looking for them," says Dr. John Long of the Natural History Museum of LA County, an expert in fossil fishes who was not involved in the study."
http://phys.org/news/2012-06-mystery-flatfish.html
"Mystery of the flatfish head solved"
Those delicious flatfishes, like halibut and sole, are also evolutionary puzzles. Their profoundly asymmetrical heads have one of the most unusual body plans among all backboned animals (vertebrates) but the evolution of their bizarre anatomy has long been a mystery. How did flatfishes, with both of their eyes on one side of their head, evolve? So puzzling was the anatomy of flounders and their kin that they were used in early arguments against Darwin and his theory of natural selection. Skeptics wondered how such unusual features could have slowly evolved whilst remaining advantageous for the fishes' survival.
"This fossil comes from Bolca in northern Italy, a site that has literally been mined for hundreds of years for its fossil fishes. This remarkable site provides a snapshot of an early coral reef assemblage. Reefs are well known as biodiversity hotspots, so it is perhaps not surprising that Bolca provides us with the first evidence of many modern fish groups," said Friedman. "Our understanding of the relationships of some of these groups is in a state of change with the increasing influx of molecular genetic studies. Fossils have not contributed very much to this debate, but specimens like that of Heteronectes reveal the superb level of detail that can be extracted from extinct species."
"This is a profound discovery which clearly shows that intermediate fossil forms, which according to certain creationist theories shouldn't exist, are regularly turning up as scientists keep looking for them," says Dr. John Long of the Natural History Museum of LA County, an expert in fossil fishes who was not involved in the study."
http://phys.org/news/2012-06-mystery-flatfish.html
Vastaukset 8
Vanhimmat
Siitä ei välimuoto juuri parane, kun ominaisuus, silmien asento on puolivälissä tavallallisen kalan ja kampelan silmiä. Millähän perusteella kreationistit yrittävät tällä kertaa kiistää sen, että kyseessä olisi välimuoto?
Minä en ymmärrä englantia. Mistä tiedän ettei solon valehtele tyystin todellisesta tutkimustuloksesta.
Ei tuo molochin mainitsema skenaario edes mikään todellinen todiste evoluutiosta olisi.
"Minä en ymmärrä englantia. Mistä tiedän ettei solon valehtele tyystin todellisesta tutkimustuloksesta."
Kai sinä nyt sen verran meihin luotat.
"Ei tuo molochin mainitsema skenaario edes mikään todellinen todiste evoluutiosta olisi."
Mikä olisi?
Etsipä uskottu, joka ymmärtää ja kysy häneltä, mitä siinä lukee.
"Minä en ymmärrä englantia. Mistä tiedän ettei solon valehtele tyystin todellisesta tutkimustuloksesta."
Mieti myös, mitä Solon hyötyisi noin lyhytjälkisestä valheesta.
Opettele englantia, tollo, ja tule sen jälkeen kitisemään typeryyksiäsi.
Ei kelpaa ennenkuin todisteeksi raahataan Crocoduck! :D
Onhan noitakin kuvattu paljon :D Tässä yksi todiste.
http://www.worth1000.com/entries/145919/crocoduck
Miinuksista ja hiljaisuudesta päätellen kretardileiri on ottanut löydön ilolla vastaan.