TRUTH:
In The Christian Bible?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As Hebrew-Christians, individuals seeking to know and do the will of the Almighty, you are confronted with a significant question: is the New Testament really the Word of G-d? Your leaders have assured you that the answer is "yes;" perhaps you have even had some emotional experiences which seem to validate your leaders' assurances. As you know, though, true faith is based neither upon trust in men (Ps, 146:3), nor even upon occurrences of the supernatural (Deut. 13). And so, the question remains, your eternal salvation contingent upon the answer.
Following is a short Biblical study, offered in an attempt to help you find the answer. We ask that you complete this study in a spirit of earnestness and prayer, asking G-d to reveal to you His truth in the quietness of your own heart. As you do so, remember that you are a member of a kingdom of priests and a holy nation (Ex.19:6), described in the Scriptures as the "apple of G-d's eye" (Zech.2:8) and participants in an "everlasting covenant" (Gen. 17:7). As such, rest assured that G-d will indeed heed your request as you sincerely seek to discover His truth.
ITEM 1: Stephen's capsule summary of Jewish History, ostensibly written under the influence of the Holy Spirit (Acts 7:55, 6:10), and an early expression of that anti-Jewish tendency which would later come to characterize the Christian Scriptures (see, e.g., 1 Thes. 2:15, Jn. 8:39-47, Matt. 23:34- 35).
*Acts 7:4--Stephen tells us that Abraham departed from Haran "after his father died." Had he studied the Book of Genesis (11:26,32; 12:4), he would have realized his error: Abraham departed from Haran at age 75, at a time when his father Terah was 145; since Terah lived for 205 years, he still had another 60 years of life remaining.
*Acts 7:14--Stephen related that 75 of Joseph's relatives were called by him to come to Egypt. Moses saw it differently: see Deut. 10:22, Gen 46:27, Ex. 1:5 (And all the persons who came from the loins of Jacob were 70 in number").
*Acts 7:16--Stephen informs us that Jacob was buried in Shechem, and that the tomb was purchased by Abraham from Emmor .
Genesis, again tells a different story. At the death of Sarah his wife, Abraham purchases the Cave of Machpelah, which is in Hebron, as a burial place. The cave is purchased from Ephron the Hittite, contrary to what Steven says in Acts. (Gen.23) It is here that Jacob is buried, as outlined in Genesis 50:13. It was Jacob who purchased a parcel of land in Shechem from Hamor, but it was purchased as a place to pitch his tent and as a place to erect an altar.
ITEM 2: Did Judas take the silver pieces from the priests and acquire a fieldwiththem(Acts 1:18), or did he return the silver pieces and then hang himself (Matt.27:5)?
ITEM 3: Where in Jeremiah's prophecies does he speak of 30 pieces of silver, as Matthew claims (27:9)? Was not Matthew in fact confusing Jeremiah with Zechariah (see Zech. 11:12-13)?
ITEM 4: Jesus himself seems to have been confused by Zechariah. In Matt. 23:25, he informs us that Zechariah, the son of Berechiah, was murdered between the Temple and the altar. Our Scriptures, however, tell a different story: it was Zechariah, the son of Jehoida, who was slain by the altar (2 Chron. 24:20-21), this in the days of the Judean king Joash. There is no indication that the prophet Zechariah, son of Berechiah (Zech. 1:1), was similarly slain.
ITEM 5: Was the Last Supper a Passover Seder (Matt. 26:17-20, Mk. 14:12,Lk.22:7) or--rather--the day of preparation for the Passover (Jn. 19:14)?
ITEM 6: Was John the Baptist Elijah, as Jesus claimed (Matt. 11:14)? if so, why did John himself deny it (Jn. 1:21)? Would "Elijah" have been so unsure of Jesus' messianic identity (lk. 7:19-20)? And where in our Scriptures is it written that Elijah would be mistreated, as Jesus claimed (Mk. 9:13)? Don't our Scriptures indicate, to the contrary, that Elijah will be successful in his mission of restoring harmony among the people (Mal.4:5-6)?
ITEM 7: Was Abiathar the High Priest when David ate the consecrated bread, as Jesus claimed in justifying his followers' violation of the Sabbath (Mk. 2:25-26)? Why do our Scriptures say that the high priest at the time was Ahimelech (1 Sam. 21:1), the father of Abiathar (1 Sam. 22:20)?
ITEM 8: Regarding Jesus' step-father, was he Joseph son of Jacob son of Mattan son of Eliezer (Matt. 1:15-16) or Joseph son of Eli son of Mattat son of Levi (Lk. 3:23-24)? And how can both sets of genealogical tables validly include Shealtiel and Zerubabbel (Matt. 1:12, Lk. 3:27), given that both of these men are descendants of Jeconiah (1 Chron. 3:16-19), of whom G-d has said, "no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting on the throne of David or ruling any more in Judah" (Jer. 22-30)?
ITEM 9: Given the new Testament statement that "if Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless" (1 Cor. 15:17), see if you can possibly reconcile the conflicting accounts of Jesus' post-resurrection appearances. To cite just one example, did Jesus, upon arising and reveal himself (a) in Galilee to the eleven remaining disciples (Judas, of course, being absent)--Matt. 26:16,Mk 16:7,14; (b)in Jerusalem to the eleven--Lk.24:33,36; (c) in Jerusalem to the ten, Thomas being absent--Jn.20;10,19,24; or (d) to Peter and then to the twelve--1 Cor.15:5? (Paul's version, choice (d), obviously presents a problem: who were the twelve, since Judas was already dead (Matt. 27:5) and his successor had not yet been chosen (Acts 1:26)?
In The Christian Bible?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As Hebrew-Christians, individuals seeking to know and do the will of the Almighty, you are confronted with a significant question: is the New Testament really the Word of G-d? Your leaders have assured you that the answer is "yes;" perhaps you have even had some emotional experiences which seem to validate your leaders' assurances. As you know, though, true faith is based neither upon trust in men (Ps, 146:3), nor even upon occurrences of the supernatural (Deut. 13). And so, the question remains, your eternal salvation contingent upon the answer.
Following is a short Biblical study, offered in an attempt to help you find the answer. We ask that you complete this study in a spirit of earnestness and prayer, asking G-d to reveal to you His truth in the quietness of your own heart. As you do so, remember that you are a member of a kingdom of priests and a holy nation (Ex.19:6), described in the Scriptures as the "apple of G-d's eye" (Zech.2:8) and participants in an "everlasting covenant" (Gen. 17:7). As such, rest assured that G-d will indeed heed your request as you sincerely seek to discover His truth.
ITEM 1: Stephen's capsule summary of Jewish History, ostensibly written under the influence of the Holy Spirit (Acts 7:55, 6:10), and an early expression of that anti-Jewish tendency which would later come to characterize the Christian Scriptures (see, e.g., 1 Thes. 2:15, Jn. 8:39-47, Matt. 23:34- 35).
*Acts 7:4--Stephen tells us that Abraham departed from Haran "after his father died." Had he studied the Book of Genesis (11:26,32; 12:4), he would have realized his error: Abraham departed from Haran at age 75, at a time when his father Terah was 145; since Terah lived for 205 years, he still had another 60 years of life remaining.
*Acts 7:14--Stephen related that 75 of Joseph's relatives were called by him to come to Egypt. Moses saw it differently: see Deut. 10:22, Gen 46:27, Ex. 1:5 (And all the persons who came from the loins of Jacob were 70 in number").
*Acts 7:16--Stephen informs us that Jacob was buried in Shechem, and that the tomb was purchased by Abraham from Emmor .
Genesis, again tells a different story. At the death of Sarah his wife, Abraham purchases the Cave of Machpelah, which is in Hebron, as a burial place. The cave is purchased from Ephron the Hittite, contrary to what Steven says in Acts. (Gen.23) It is here that Jacob is buried, as outlined in Genesis 50:13. It was Jacob who purchased a parcel of land in Shechem from Hamor, but it was purchased as a place to pitch his tent and as a place to erect an altar.
ITEM 2: Did Judas take the silver pieces from the priests and acquire a fieldwiththem(Acts 1:18), or did he return the silver pieces and then hang himself (Matt.27:5)?
ITEM 3: Where in Jeremiah's prophecies does he speak of 30 pieces of silver, as Matthew claims (27:9)? Was not Matthew in fact confusing Jeremiah with Zechariah (see Zech. 11:12-13)?
ITEM 4: Jesus himself seems to have been confused by Zechariah. In Matt. 23:25, he informs us that Zechariah, the son of Berechiah, was murdered between the Temple and the altar. Our Scriptures, however, tell a different story: it was Zechariah, the son of Jehoida, who was slain by the altar (2 Chron. 24:20-21), this in the days of the Judean king Joash. There is no indication that the prophet Zechariah, son of Berechiah (Zech. 1:1), was similarly slain.
ITEM 5: Was the Last Supper a Passover Seder (Matt. 26:17-20, Mk. 14:12,Lk.22:7) or--rather--the day of preparation for the Passover (Jn. 19:14)?
ITEM 6: Was John the Baptist Elijah, as Jesus claimed (Matt. 11:14)? if so, why did John himself deny it (Jn. 1:21)? Would "Elijah" have been so unsure of Jesus' messianic identity (lk. 7:19-20)? And where in our Scriptures is it written that Elijah would be mistreated, as Jesus claimed (Mk. 9:13)? Don't our Scriptures indicate, to the contrary, that Elijah will be successful in his mission of restoring harmony among the people (Mal.4:5-6)?
ITEM 7: Was Abiathar the High Priest when David ate the consecrated bread, as Jesus claimed in justifying his followers' violation of the Sabbath (Mk. 2:25-26)? Why do our Scriptures say that the high priest at the time was Ahimelech (1 Sam. 21:1), the father of Abiathar (1 Sam. 22:20)?
ITEM 8: Regarding Jesus' step-father, was he Joseph son of Jacob son of Mattan son of Eliezer (Matt. 1:15-16) or Joseph son of Eli son of Mattat son of Levi (Lk. 3:23-24)? And how can both sets of genealogical tables validly include Shealtiel and Zerubabbel (Matt. 1:12, Lk. 3:27), given that both of these men are descendants of Jeconiah (1 Chron. 3:16-19), of whom G-d has said, "no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting on the throne of David or ruling any more in Judah" (Jer. 22-30)?
ITEM 9: Given the new Testament statement that "if Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless" (1 Cor. 15:17), see if you can possibly reconcile the conflicting accounts of Jesus' post-resurrection appearances. To cite just one example, did Jesus, upon arising and reveal himself (a) in Galilee to the eleven remaining disciples (Judas, of course, being absent)--Matt. 26:16,Mk 16:7,14; (b)in Jerusalem to the eleven--Lk.24:33,36; (c) in Jerusalem to the ten, Thomas being absent--Jn.20;10,19,24; or (d) to Peter and then to the twelve--1 Cor.15:5? (Paul's version, choice (d), obviously presents a problem: who were the twelve, since Judas was already dead (Matt. 27:5) and his successor had not yet been chosen (Acts 1:26)?
Vastaukset 2
Vanhimmat
Taineli suomeksi, Daniyel hepreaksi, Dawyel arabiaksi!
Kirjoittanut: 14.1.2005 klo 18.48
Keskustellaan sinun ongelmista.Sinun kysymykset ovat tietysti vain osa ongelmista.
1)Sinä olet kirjoittanut sana "messias" yli
kolmesataa kerta (300) kirjoituksissa.
Kirjoituksissa painotetaan erikoisesti messiasta.
Olet kirjoittanut sana "messias profetia"
sata kaksikymmentä (120) ja yli viisikymmentä
kerta sanat"Messiasta on yli kolme sataa profetia"tai tähän suuntaan.
Arvioinnin loppupäätös on:
Sinä olet vain kiinnostunut juutalaisuuden selityksiä sinun yli kolmen satan messian profetian.Sinä esität näitä sinun "profetioita".
Ja sitten tulee yhtäkkiä vastaus kysymyksellesi.
Vastaus ei miellytä sinua,vastaus ei menne sinun omasi kuvituksen ja teologian mukaan.Ja sinä tuleet hermostuneksi ja stressannut ylös,mutta nyt olet lähes paniikissa ja paniikkikohtaukset esiintyvät tilanteeseen.Ja väkisten tämän perään laitat uusia kysymyksiä ja sitten tulee sinulle
epätodellinen olo,vapina/tärinä kontrollin menettämisen pelko, sekoamisen pelko,Hikoilu, kylmät ja kuumat aallot jne.Tämä on sinun diagnoosi.Sinun oma teologia revitään sinun silmien edessä.Tämä antaa sinulle kyseiset psykologiset oireet ja tämä lävistäjä on
"rasismia vastaan".Sinulla on
rauhoittumisongelmia ja merkittäviä häiriöitä.
Sinulla krooninen sairaus ja psykologisia ongelmia,mutta tämän pälle voi sinulla ola krooninen köyhyys, työttömyys tai syrjintä.
Vastaa tähän viestiin
Kerro kaverille tästä viestistä
Ilmoita asiattomasta viestistä
Vielä kerran Taineli!!!!
Kirjoittanut: Sivusta seurannut 14.1.2005 klo 19.01
Rasismia vastaan_on_sinun_teologian_ rikkoja.
Sinä olet omasta uskonnosta varma,mutta Rasismia vastaan rikkoo sinun omia näkökulmia,selityksen selityksen perään,päivästä päivään,Rasismia vastaan murskain murskaamalla ,halkaise halkaisemalla toinen toisesta perään kaikista sinun kirjoituksista.Sinä vielä näet henkilökohtaisesti Rasismia vastaan on sinun
yli-mies,voittaja ,ylivoimainen voittaja koska hän halkaise sinun teologiset näkökulmat.Sinä olet yrittänyt rikkoa hänen teologia ja näkökulmia,mutta ett ole pystynyt.Sinusta yksinkertaisesti ole siihen,ja tämä tekee sinulle psykologisia ongelmia.Sinulla on usein häiriön seurauksena lisää ongelmia, kuten masennusta, ahdistuneisuutta ja lisääntynyttä päihteiden käyttöä.Sinun paniikkihäiriölle ovat ominaisia yllättävät, voimakkaat ahdistuneisuuskohtaukset.Kohtaus alkaa räjähdysmäisesti ja pahenee nopeasti täydeksi pakokauhuksi. Henkisinä oireina on usein kuoleman, hallinnan menettämisen tai sekoamisen pelko.Samaan aikaan ruumiilliset oireet tuntuvat voimakkaina: sydämen tykytys, rintakipu, hengenahdistus, huimaus, vapina ja päänsärky, tunne ilman loppumisesta jne. Jälkioireena on usein voimakas väsymys, hämmennys ja huolestuneisuus.Paniikkikohtaus on hyvin voimakas ahdistustila, jonka aikana keho ikään kuin pyrkii taistelemaan karhua vastaan.
Tukehtumisen tunne.Rintakipu tai epämukava tunne rinnassa.Huimaus tasapainon puute tai pyörtyminen.Hulluksi tulemisen tai kontrollin menetyksen pelko.Epätodellinen tai outo olo, ympäristöstä irtautumisen tunne.
Kuumat tai kylmät aallot.Palpitaatio tai kiihtynyt sydämen syke.Hengästyminen, hyperventilaatio,hikoilu vapina tai tärina.
Sinulla on myös lapsesta asti muita
psykologisia ongelmia.Mikä antanut sinulle vakavia traumoja,joka on sodan kanssa tekemistä.
ps:Toivottavasti tämä mene perille,että kaikki näkee sinun todellinen ongelmasi.Voit ota yhteyttä minun.Minä työskentelee psykologina. Psykoterapiaa Kivelänkatu 1, 00260 HELSINKI.
**********************************************
Minun eniten kirjoitus sinun kaverista "arab"
tiedät itse miten hyvin tämä sopi hänen.
*****************************************''''
NimiM:arab on fundamentalisti Juutalainen tai Assyrialainen .Tämä on hänen profiili kuva.
Hän on hyvin häiriintyny aggressiivinen nuori mies ,ikä noin 20v-25v.Hänella on suuri viha muslimia vastan .Hän on lapsena kokenut jotain hyvin absoluuttista pahaa Perheessä kohta.Ja tästä hän viha muslimia.Hän ota mukan uskonto asia hänen viha muslimia vastan .Tämä saa hänelle hyvän tunne.Ja taas hän on normali eikä vanhat pahat muistot enää paina mieltä.Hän ei muista enää miltä tuntuu olla onnellinen.Monet pahat tapahtumat on hänella olut lapsena.Kaikki tämä liity Islamin.Hän ei olle uskovainen vai taistele
oma demonia vastan joka liity Islamin.raukka on ihan hukassa.Hänella on psykologisia ongelmia.
Kyllä NimiM: arab mainitsee että hän ei ole olut "muslimi" eikä "kristitty".Tämä selvästi sano että hän voi olla Assyrialainen tai Juutalainen.Assyrialaiset on Ortodoksi-Kristitty
ja suuri % on fundamentalistia.Ja hän puhu paljon miten Jumala kostaa muslimille.Ja taas tämä liity hänen halun kostaa kaikki pahat tapahtumat mitä muslimit on tehnyt hänelle.
Hän on 100% valmis tappaman muslimin jos hänen kosto halu menne lian pitkälle.Hän pidä Israelia ja Usa osa hänen halu tappa kaikki muslimit.Hänen tulevaisuus näkö on joka Kosta mikä on koko Islamin kansa .Jotain mitä hän ei voi ja tämä teke hänestä raivohulluiksi käytökseltään.Hyvin hiljainen häiriintyny aggressiivinen nuori mies.
Kaikki hänen tekstit on aggressiivisia muslimia vastan.Koska hänellä oli halu päästä pois kaikkista pahasta sodan muistoista mikä muslimit on tehnyt.Traumojen purku on ollut hänellä vaikeaa.Hän on tumma ihoinen ,mustat silmät,mustat hiukset.
Hänella on paljon psykologisia ongelmia.
Taisi mennä tulistunut kirjeesi väärään osoitteeseen, vai mitä tuumit? :D