Mikä Eurooppaa ja Suomea vaivaa?

Justiinsa joo! Noin naivi voi olla vain suvakki. 32000 tullut, montako käännytetty heti? Osa lähtenyt toki vapaaehtoisesti, kun on kylmä, ruoka pahaa jne. Mutta kuinka moni lusperi on tehnyt valituksen ja sen turvin loisii täällä perusteetta ainakin vuoden? Kuinka moni tehnyt päätöksen, ettei mihinkään lähde, vaikka kielteisiä päätöksiä tulisi monta? Ainakin se Sipilälle esittäytynyt 17-vuotias (oikeasti yli 30v) on täällä edelleen suvakkien ilona.

Kommetteja on reilut 2000, syyyskuun juttu.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/hungary/11893375/Hungary-to-EU-migrant-quotas-will-repeat-Western-Europes-failed-attempts-at-multiculturalism.html#disqus_thread

US-eliitti, rothchildit, GoldmanSachsitja Sorokset yrittävät myös Japania täyttää sakeilla, kun on vanhaa väestöä.


Kommentti:
"Now you see these insane people condemning Japan as well. Aging population? Well, import millions of strangers to do your chores and everything will work out."

Janis Varoufakis linkkaa tapahtumia taloustieteen näkökulmasta.

http://yanisvaroufakis.eu/2016/01/19/our-movement-to-democratise-europe-developments-in-latin-america-and-china-interview-with-brazils-globo-tv/

"The political dynamics in Europe evolved very fast in 2015. From the tough negotiations of the Greek debt you had started in the beginning of the year with the Eurogroup to the huge refugee crisis, which had pulled Europe apart, and still the commotion with the Paris recent attacks, with dramatics results as well. Would you be able to link these events in order to help us to understand what is going on in this new old world?

--


But beyond that, we have a crisis in full swing, everywhere in Europe, with each sub-crisis (e.g. in the Periphery) reinforcing the rest (e.g. in Germany). More broadly, we have a crisis of public debt, we have a crisis of very low investment in the private sector and in the public sector – primarily in the private sector – we have a crisis of the banks, and we have a crisis of poverty. Rising poverty. Those four crises are contributing, collectively and individually, towards the fragmentation of Europe. We need to deal with them. Immediately. Not in the future, not in two years, ten years time, because while we are dithering Europe is fragmenting. And it becomes impossible to deal with other problems that are exogenous, like refugees and terrorism and so forth.

It is possible to deploy or redeploy existing institutions that we have in Europe like the European Central Bank, the European Investment Bank, like the European Stability Mechanism, in a way that deals with these crises.

So, tell us about. What should be the design of a monetary system in Europe?

It should simulate a Federation.

Suppose that the United States, in 2008, were structured like the Eurozone is. You would have a small state like Nevada where the crisis began with house prices going down, and developers losing their money firing construction workers and defaulting on their bankers who then went bankrupt. Now imagine if the state of Nevada had to pay for the rising unemployment benefits and at the same time to bailout the banks of Nevada. And to do that by borrowing money from the international markets. No one would lend to the state of Nevada to do this. The state of Nevada and the banks of Nevada would have gone bust.

Imagine further if the state government of Nevada went to Washington DC and said, “well, we are bust, help us”. And Washington said: “Ok, we give you a huge loan, but on the condition that your reduce pensions, you reduce wages in Nevada”, which would shrink the incomes in Nevada from which those loans would have to be repaid. Then Nevada would be finished. And immediately investors the world over would think, which US state comes next?

Of course this did not happened in the United States. Why? Because the Federal Reserve and the Central Bank looked after the banks – it was not the states that bailed out the banks – and the Federal Government paid for social security and unemployment benefits. And because the Federal government had the Central Bank behind it, to buy its debt, to buy the treasury bills, the United States didn’t have the problems that Europe has.

Is it possible to have a Federation in Europe?

No it is not possible to have a Federation today. It is much harder to convince the French and the Germans and the Greeks and the Portuguese to federate in this environment when everyone is turning against everyone else. But what we can do is use the existing institutions that we have – ECB, EIB, ESM to simulate one. Technically, we could have done it in a week. Politically, it is proving impossible. "

Varoufakisin kirjoituksesta.

Yanis Varoufakis
thoughts for the post-2008 world

Our movement to democratise Europe & developments in Latin America and China – Interview with Brazil’s GLOBO TV
ovement to democratise Europe & developments in Latin America and China – Interview with Brazil’s GLOBO TV
Posted on January 19, 2016

"What do you think it’s going to happen now?

Well, you don’t need to be a prophet. The continuing decline of Greece. What has been happening over the last 5 years. We will continue to witness the shrinkage of national income, extremely low investment…

There is no way out.

Of course not. It is not a question of left, right, political argumentation. This is the plain, undiluted truth. Let me just mention for the benefit of our audience one example. Just one example, I could give you three hundred. I’ll give you one: Before Christmas, now we are in December, before Christmas, Greek business, whether they are large business, medium size businesses, or business of one person, had to pay the whole of 2016’s tax!

Is it possible?

No, but they have to. Now, I submit to you that this is what you do to a country if you want to crush it. Not to help it recover. And it’s not a left and right wing assessment. Here I am, a radical left winger, speaking out in favour of business! The government, under the pressure of the Troika, increased corporate taxes from 26 to 29 per cent. Here is a left wing minister of finance trying to prevent an increase in corporate tax rates! And trying to prevent the hundred per cent pre-payment of next year’s business tax. This year. This is the madness of Europe. Could I sign up to that? No! As I said, I’d rather have my arm chopped off than sign it. And the question is not why I did not sign it. The question is why those that forced upon us this terrible program insisted that we should sign it. That is the question.
--
...Remember: the parallel payment system under construction would not be in drachmas, it would be in euros. So no, I’ve been consistent on this.

More generally, let me repeat my main insight: We cannot fix Greece without fixing the Eurozone. And if we fix the Eurozone we have a chance to fix Greece, Ireland, Portugal and so on and so forth.

Fixing the Eurozone means that you have a new ambition of political leadership?

I am a very reluctant politician. A highly reluctant politician. I never wanted to be one in the first place. I would prefer to write books – as I always did in the past. That’s would be ideal for me. I don’t have the ambition to be a political leader. Life is very good to waste in this regard. But, once I threw my hat in the political ring, I have the obligation towards the people who believed in my analysis, and voted for me, to stay the course. My great worry is that Europe is slipping steadily into a post-modern 1930’s. With the rise of the ultranationalists, with the rise of the fascists, Nazis in my country, and elsewhere, with centrifugal forces that are pulling Europe apart, doing a great damage to the rest of the world. So I think that as citizens, as members of the European Enlightenment, we have an obligation – all of us – to step out of our comfort zone, to postpone writing our novels and books, and to participate in politics in order to stop this.
--

Isn’t it a possible scenario for the future?

Yes, but it is a terrible scenario. It’s one that I can’t possibly back. This is the scenario of Le Pen. And it is a scenario which I think is going to unleash terrible demonic forces throughout Europe. Which are going to destroy the Left. Democrats. The European idea. The only people who will benefit from that are the ultra-right. So I want no part of that. I don’t want to see this happening.

We should not have created the euro. That’s true. But you see, once you have created it, it is silly to try to return to where we would have been had we not created it. Such an ill-fated attempt would be a great boost, for Marine Le Pen, Golden Dawn, the ultra-nationalists everywhere. This is why DiEM, our pan-European Movement that I’m working towards, is not going to have as its strategy, as its platform, the fragmentation of the Euro.

Of course, we will not be swayed by the threats of being expelled from the euro if we insist that the EU and the Eurozone must be democratised and rationalised. If someone says to me: “Continue to confront Brussels and the ECB and we will throw you out of the euro!” I’d reply to her/him: “Go ahead! I refuse to be terrorised by such threats. You are the worst threat to the euro and to the European Union. Not us. We are not going anywhere. We are staying in the euro, and the EU, determined to fix it, to democratise it.”

Thank you very much.
Thank you.


"

Edessä.vuosien.taistelua kirjoitti:

Varoufakisin kirjoituksesta.

Yanis Varoufakis
thoughts for the post-2008 world

Our movement to democratise Europe & developments in Latin America and China – Interview with Brazil’s GLOBO TV
ovement to democratise Europe & developments in Latin America and China – Interview with Brazil’s GLOBO TV
Posted on January 19, 2016

"What do you think it’s going to happen now?

Well, you don’t need to be a prophet. The continuing decline of Greece. What has been happening over the last 5 years. We will continue to witness the shrinkage of national income, extremely low investment…

There is no way out.

Of course not. It is not a question of left, right, political argumentation. This is the plain, undiluted truth. Let me just mention for the benefit of our audience one example. Just one example, I could give you three hundred. I’ll give you one: Before Christmas, now we are in December, before Christmas, Greek business, whether they are large business, medium size businesses, or business of one person, had to pay the whole of 2016’s tax!

Is it possible?

No, but they have to. Now, I submit to you that this is what you do to a country if you want to crush it. Not to help it recover. And it’s not a left and right wing assessment. Here I am, a radical left winger, speaking out in favour of business! The government, under the pressure of the Troika, increased corporate taxes from 26 to 29 per cent. Here is a left wing minister of finance trying to prevent an increase in corporate tax rates! And trying to prevent the hundred per cent pre-payment of next year’s business tax. This year. This is the madness of Europe. Could I sign up to that? No! As I said, I’d rather have my arm chopped off than sign it. And the question is not why I did not sign it. The question is why those that forced upon us this terrible program insisted that we should sign it. That is the question.
--
...Remember: the parallel payment system under construction would not be in drachmas, it would be in euros. So no, I’ve been consistent on this.

More generally, let me repeat my main insight: We cannot fix Greece without fixing the Eurozone. And if we fix the Eurozone we have a chance to fix Greece, Ireland, Portugal and so on and so forth.

Fixing the Eurozone means that you have a new ambition of political leadership?

I am a very reluctant politician. A highly reluctant politician. I never wanted to be one in the first place. I would prefer to write books – as I always did in the past. That’s would be ideal for me. I don’t have the ambition to be a political leader. Life is very good to waste in this regard. But, once I threw my hat in the political ring, I have the obligation towards the people who believed in my analysis, and voted for me, to stay the course. My great worry is that Europe is slipping steadily into a post-modern 1930’s. With the rise of the ultranationalists, with the rise of the fascists, Nazis in my country, and elsewhere, with centrifugal forces that are pulling Europe apart, doing a great damage to the rest of the world. So I think that as citizens, as members of the European Enlightenment, we have an obligation – all of us – to step out of our comfort zone, to postpone writing our novels and books, and to participate in politics in order to stop this.
--

Isn’t it a possible scenario for the future?

Yes, but it is a terrible scenario. It’s one that I can’t possibly back. This is the scenario of Le Pen. And it is a scenario which I think is going to unleash terrible demonic forces throughout Europe. Which are going to destroy the Left. Democrats. The European idea. The only people who will benefit from that are the ultra-right. So I want no part of that. I don’t want to see this happening.

We should not have created the euro. That’s true. But you see, once you have created it, it is silly to try to return to where we would have been had we not created it. Such an ill-fated attempt would be a great boost, for Marine Le Pen, Golden Dawn, the ultra-nationalists everywhere. This is why DiEM, our pan-European Movement that I’m working towards, is not going to have as its strategy, as its platform, the fragmentation of the Euro.

Of course, we will not be swayed by the threats of being expelled from the euro if we insist that the EU and the Eurozone must be democratised and rationalised. If someone says to me: “Continue to confront Brussels and the ECB and we will throw you out of the euro!” I’d reply to her/him: “Go ahead! I refuse to be terrorised by such threats. You are the worst threat to the euro and to the European Union. Not us. We are not going anywhere. We are staying in the euro, and the EU, determined to fix it, to democratise it.”

Thank you very much.
Thank you.


"

Varoufikisin jutusta...

"My great worry is that Europe is slipping steadily into a post-modern 1930’s. With the rise of the ultranationalists, with the rise of the fascists, Nazis in my country, and elsewhere, with centrifugal forces that are pulling Europe apart, doing a great damage to the rest of the world. "

Niin, vastakohta ei siis ole demokraattinen, vaan vasemmiston diktatuuri. Varouf. on kommari. Eiköhän yksinkertaisin ratkaisu ole lopettaa toisten valtioiden pakottaminen ja sallia itsenäiset valtiot, ilman natsi-vasemmiston ylivataa ja diktatuuri, EU & US & Berliini eivät ole ratkaisu muille! Joskin Suomen päättäjät on Lipposen ja Sauli Niinistön tahdosta valehdellen ja puolitotuuksilla viety vasemmistolaiseen EU:hun diktaattorin ottein. Sitten Väyrynen pyörtää kansalaisaloitteensa ja kannattaa edeelleen Niinistöä, joka oli ensin Venäjän kaveri, mutta euro-pakolais-berliini-brysseli -paineessa lähti uutisoimaan itse Venäjän rullaamia pakolaisliikkeitä Suomeen.

Me äänestäjät emme tiedä kuka on oikassa, sen olemme huomanneet, että SDP:N, RKP:n ja kokoomuksen politiikka on aina ollut etujen muualle siirtoa, nyt sitten vielä loisten imurointia jakamaan sosiaaliturvaa, asuntoja, koulutusta kaikkea paskaa, mitä huonoin mahdollinen vallanpitäjä voi keksiä kansalaistensa vähittäiseen tuhoamiseen. Pikkulasten murha vauvana, kuten Herodeksen tai jonkun hullun keisarin Neron aikana tapahtuivat vain muutamaa vuosikymmentä aikaisemmin, Suomen vallanpitäjille ei riittänyt edes 1940-luvun sotimiset, vaan Sipilän ja Stubbin johdolla ollaan menossa autuaalliseen Euroopan kattavaan sosialisimiin. En ikinä ole tällaista äänestänyt.

Luikertelu on Sipilän lupaus tukea Merkelin toimia, Katainen yksi oikea käsi. Se järjestää jotain asioita kulisseissa, niissä sutkinpuuhissa se on erittäin hyvä. Se voi antaa investointirahaa tai mitä vittua tahansa ja tulla kirjoittamaan lehtiin suomeksi, että "pakolaiset ovat voimavara", juuri niin kuin se itse kuvittelee, haaveilee, rakentelee EU:n liittovaltiota, ohjeiden mukaan, kukaan ei kerro, ketkä ja mitä tahot sille kaiken kaikkiaan antaa korvauksia toimistaan. Tehokas on kuin mikä. Tuo tapaus kyllä saa Euroopan sotkettua, se on vielä alle 50-vuotias, voimat riittää ja tehokkaita naisapulaisia sekä laskumiehiä on köörissä.

Kaikkein huvittavinta on se, että Suomella on ns, NATO optio. Kukaan toinen maa maailmassa ei edes tiedä tällaisesta optiosta. Vain Suomi tietää.