täynnä aukkoja
"For example, the following statement is not correctly based on sound
physical principles, nor is it based on structural engineering
principles.
"A symmetrical collapse, as observed, evidently requires the
simultaneous "pulling" of most or all of the support columns. The
Second Law of Thermodynamics implies that the likelihood of complete
and symmetrical collapse due to random fires as in the "official"
theory is small, since asymmetrical failure is so much more likely."
In my opinion, this physicist is talking out of his hat."
"For example, the following statement is not correctly based on sound
physical principles, nor is it based on structural engineering
principles.
"A symmetrical collapse, as observed, evidently requires the
simultaneous "pulling" of most or all of the support columns. The
Second Law of Thermodynamics implies that the likelihood of complete
and symmetrical collapse due to random fires as in the "official"
theory is small, since asymmetrical failure is so much more likely."
In my opinion, this physicist is talking out of his hat."
Vastaukset 1
Vanhimmat
Nyt kannattaa alkaa vierittämään suosittua avaustani Jonesin suomennetusta esseestä piiloon, ettei kiusalliset asiat leviäisi niin kauhiasti!