Most Embarrassing Short Stories Vol.1
HOW TO LEARN? ...TO DO THE RESEARCH?
(note: paragraphs align somedays in www somedays not, sorry this day was such so be patient)
First of all to remind someone who is not too conscious yet about own personality, which regards myself too, I think it is good to remind the research is not the sexiest way to spend a life. However if You lack money, consequently being weak state of health You probably are drawned to the research occupations. It is hard to imagine someone would be interested to research being already intelligent and healthy. I would have never open a book if I could have only open the legs of a pretty woman. Starting a career is to examine Your self. Because You engage to do it You are to find a number of faults. I understood early no-one ever would buy my books so choose to write only to prove I exist. I have no kids. I also have no money, whence no dignity. As result the outcome is what life would force such a loosers to do anyway. I will tell all my advices for free for people having better anatomy. I might even beg them to read me. My recent accomplishment as a researcher is I am a some kind of an evolutionary oddling who thought to have born healthy and successful but forgot this would last exactly thirty years. The latter part of the life story concentrates to give tips that working with number of dates will results a score even a declining level of percentages. After the success rate drops below 10 per cent You start to feel an slight humiliation. Still work will bear the fruit. It just have to be done more. I am however lazy. My counter strike was to revenge on females and I made myself unattainable. I created an inner female to have everything else but sex. After a five years celibacy I got horny. I started to depict in net how painful and unhealthy it is for a person to not use his or her senses . I guess somebody saw the writing while about the same time I find out I had been wrong on my political knowledge. Buying sex in Finland had not been banned in Finland but once I started to express my needs it was made such. I guess after I had opened my mouth politics probably had an idea banning the sex all over the country would help to get rid of the not needed societal outcasts; like bachelors and invalids. I could not agree what could kill more efficiently but banning people to use the strongest need in human lives; the sex and have it in a way God meant. Not making excuses of the existence of humiliating rubber dildos or vaginas and insult the God. As a researcher we are soon guided to the lakes of the origins of the bad bags of the ”good governor”. It shows there could be printed a booklet which list how to govern and exploit the humanity and how nation and people has been successfully cheated and ordinary people lives wasted through centuries by power seeking politics. However, I would write it. No one would buy. I tell You free. Regulator Tip One is to channel this most powerful force in the life. The sex instinct. To ban it. We have a strong religion and wilful armies to attack anywhere a prophet points an arm. To allow it we have people who love life, are peaceful, friendly and the question the governmental authority by asking questions like kid: ”Why Do You tease Daddy and Mother. Why Can You not let us live?” if You are a researcher and You start to ask what is the nature of the things. Why something move? Why something is foxed on spot? What is it waiting? Why the other stone moved now? Then You may make discoveries which may be kept embarrassing from a point of view. For some reasons we have choosed to live most of our history through religious societies. If You can explain this from the scientific point of view, please give me link where I can study Your perspectives. To support the intent of a more democratic and safer society If I only would have excessive time at my disposal I could probably list the decades and centuries when buying sex was a part of the societal life. Then decades when it was strictly denied. However I must satisfy to give only the idea. Sometimes in my country there is asked why the people will not vote more actively. I can ad only my story. I have voted in every elections. However why? I guess because my parents forced me to do so.They were good to turn people«s head what it comes to politics. They even could turn my grandmother head at her eighties to vote the right wing even she had voted for the life the social democrats and been through the life the poor as a person financially can be. I think for now on I have to rethink my attitude to support people to vote. I can not no more do it because I have personally difficulty to understands speeches which does not seem to tell the honesty or give too much of a clarity of the idea or the person. Basically I would like to support a people to have a good life. However I guess it comes by roundtrips. Personally feel problematic to vote for a person who belongs to a party. I do not understand what kind of people or person is if he needs for his or her support a party. However, before getting into that lets take a short glimpse to the present politics in Finland. My glimpse was to see a short period in telly where someone (it does bear no meaning whoever it was) said that someone should be elected because we live always a more quickly changing environment than previously. It was enough for me to get out of the watching the program. I could hardly imagine more than thinking thank You boys and girls You are establishing your arguments still on a clichés. Also I did not understood what an earth the candidate would have selected to do in an everaccelerating universe would he or she be a ping pong player or would the Sitting Bull attitude been the choice? It was left to mystery while not needed to argument in any way. Sadly we choose to the most important jobs a person without too many questions made. I have no more doubts how Hitler could lead the nation to a destruction. It was probably banned to ask to make any psychological test before recruitment the head of a state at his time. I lack knowledge is there any development in the recruiting process or are we still a kids who needs a strong leadership? Why in the earth would an independent citizen would need a string leadership. It should be totally contrary the case nowadays. President should be our friend number one. Not some distant personality to salute. But here we come to the question of a power and the democracy. Electing the presidency in anno domini 2006 in Finland seems to be still electing an authority. However has anyone ever asked why? Or is such a question banned. If so ,why? On my own thinking safest place to live is a democracy where any individual has exact rights with a president. Of course excluding the authority when to relate to a task is able to specify legally. Such wishes means working ideals. Ideals today’s world will not jus roll on themselves nor perfectly. At basin in our hearts we are wanting humans not servants, unless we are forced to. However from the point of view of a nation the politic should be only selected a servants, the humble men, the philosophist at heart. Philosopher means not a fragile one-sided poet watching the birds only but able to experience and see the life with 360 degrees. To a trustee number one of the people: the president this is important. I would not take a face-value everyone who set them as a candidates has such abilities. Everything can be learned but being the service for simply to everybody might take a 1000 years of studies from some of us. I belong to this group. I could never work as a president more than a few minutes at maximum. I have personal power complexes and I am too short sighted and I honesty does not love people I actually hate them. However do we citizens as a voter know how open is the personality of our candidates if they only use clichés? Speaking of the power complexes and electing presidents how many of us takes care to see that living in a post-religious societies the president can also be projected upon our own and the nation’s sexual wishes. At least when the head figure is elected in an fairly undemocratic process concerning the recruiting methods are not used, not even to speak of astrology for instance we might project our hidden unlived sexual fantasies to our candidates. If we need a good fuck we tend to watch action films, we speak with eagerminded and aggressive people and we laugh when somebody says something very punctual in a debate. However if we would live in a country where You could by same safe-sex services which would not mean disease spreading risks being more involved than when the majority is doing it we would have less need to project expectations to the president as a high priest or a high priestess. Speaking of power, I would not personally need to see a president as a point of view of the army commander. I would like to live in a society where everybody could laugh on my writings and say. ”Hey what an idiot. I learned nothing, Old fool go home”. However sadly I felt some of my thoughts might not always be remembered too well by everyone. I have a personal intuition, meaning I only guess the attachment of ”army commander” or ”a commander in a chief” to have strict overrule of al the land,- air,-sea force and the submarines to submiss the land is something which is a poor advertising of the presidency. Sadly, such a an acts together with long winding talks of civil crisis management may make a generation of the youth and their grand pas and grand mass perhaps believe the nations are on the brink of the great war and it might be a good idea to select for a president someone who is at least a corporal and can run the mile under five minutes. I disagree the president shoals be aggressive or combatant. First of all because I would be worried for such a presidents physical condition and intellect. Being aggressive, decisive and commanding is not an especially skill needing task or a personal trait. Look, even I can do it. Every individual born are able to become aggressive and defend if only life forces. Perhaps as we have good possibility to join a wealth we might forget it is not a skill or a personality trait but for true it is a universal survival instinct. I would personally enjoy to wake up in a society where someone would gently bring me a bucket of chocolate saying,”Oh please do not bother to write such a things everyone knows them already”. However I feel many of us live still in a yesterdays world if they think a woman or a small and philosophy looking man would make a less decisive army commander at a crisis. I hope what I say here would be not a surprise to anyone while I claim there is also not a single government who would be fooled that if president is educated, well mannered and have a capacity to be friendly and charming Finns would lack somehow decisive army or generals in service. This is why I personally do not like too much our presidents being attached to the Tank brigades filmed and interviewed them with army. Of course this attitude would make myself too the editor of the thirties, however I am still worry such an imagery pinpoint subconsciously too narrow image of the presidential tasks in the minds of the people. especially suggesting loose connotations e.g. to the old people of this country who has a lot of emotions belonged to a past and early history of this nation.The will to defend to the county has nothing to do with a president. It is the people, the army and its leadership. On the contrary it presents the fact the president should be able to influence also the more but foreign political relationship. Or then we should have another president or a person with a face who takes care of the interest of the citizens daily lives. I think it is irresponsible to leave people of the Finland to the mercy of the party politics. Here I get back to the thing I said earlier. For me it seems we live in a time where still it is okay to think governing is made by parties. Again parties are faceless and they do not have to be responsible. I think when there is not a person who does not need to explain its acts I would not personally trust such an governing principles . I face this everyday. The amount of time and work is wasted while there is no cotact persons too often. There is only belief someone will continue from..then where. Al over again from the beginning e.g. At least I feel in my country there is odd political atmosphere. This I refer to an thought where it is demanded a ”discipline” from party member, so that they would vote...how..against.the people who elected them. I personally could not be more fearful of such an act. I have no idea how a democracy can be fulfilled when there is parties who demands group discipline. I think it sounds only a dangerous. If I would like to increase the safety of the society and have less taxes paid it would mean enabling more democracy as well as the rights and responsibility of an individual to grow. Being strict as well it means the strategy will not be undermined only for short term ideas. I rather would be a member of the society where there would not fear any party to get over another and have ”discipline” like in a some kind of authoritian historical societies we have only a nightmares to work for and generations to suffer from the weak decisions in a democracy when it was given step by step to people who say something is so efficient when no one else had to tell. However we live in a democracies. Majority of the people loves stability, place to work, friendliness and respect. While in xmas everyone is nice. I will also want and give You a political gift. It is something which Mao Tsetung might have as well give to the nice xmas present. It is a little pamphlet continuing the list above. ...Level of education of an individuals will rise. Governing principles must anticipate and walk with this. Sooner in Finland we adapt the policies supporting the individual and brain power instead of controlling citizens, sooner such early innovating societies gets the competitive edge of such a brains in a gratitude to feel well and nurtured. Thankful citizens joying of somewhat efficient Finnish free education brings out of the Finn an independendent and amazingly self-responsible citizen who governs her or him own tasks needing less bureaucracy and services from a Finnish government. Open democracies are supported in Finland. When people find the benefits of the open democracies in Finland they vote for leaders who are open personalities carrying no such a secrets which the voters would have to regret later like waging a war against the former Soviet Union. An educated Finnish voter can demand the quality and he or she creates models to interview and test the candidates to make secure the promises is delivered. If they are not there will be kept constant ranking,- and work lists of the deed done or left undone by parliament servants i.e. the elected politically voted members in a Finnish parliament. The ranking list of the responsibility to be on the spot and cash in election promises as well as the work list with spend hours are publicly and democratically for everyone to see in an internet or equivalent democratic mode. The tax payers money will be respected in shockingly radical way referring to the present state, meaning the expenditures will be explained so that common voter can understand without any further education nor waste of time why taxes was paid such an amount and why it makes or makes not sense too support such a government by giving up money and trust of one«s own personal life. During a transit period which takes many decades for Finnish parliament to organise things in cost-effective manner the volunteer groups of invalids and long term unemployed will help the government and parliament out from the fearful crisis. ”Respecting an individual and tax payer”-politic works towards it ideals building an internet with voluntary budgets and control system t help the government save tax payers and its employers money. Presently the employers of the government does not control the expenditure the of the employee in Finland. As a natural result our government and parliament is asking help and advices because for an employee task is not to control the employers money but vice versa. Easy to control system first in the internet make also easy for parliament member to study the society to understand what expenditure is needed and what is not. Presently the expenditure is so chaotic and big as an ocean there is no single person who can manage it. Or at least no more at the available. Easy to read governmental spending control enables Finnish parliament member to get realistic picture of the worlds and stop laughing and not being on the spot when decision are maked for the best interest for the Finnish voters. Earning the parliamentary salary is one of the first issues to discussed. But rather briefly. If the present salary prevents for example the left wingers to adapt to the situation of the poor my suggestion is the left winger will be paid only one quarter of the salary the right wingers will have. Such a personal adaptation to the needs of the voters will help the daily politics as well as to respect voters. If the voters have been very rich the elective should have at least ten times higher salary than a left winger. Logical outcomes in a personal life would help the elective to follow not the party group discipline but the voter group discipline. The control system in the internet which is not included into a parliamentary budget because if it would be it costs would be automatically quadruple is in first years reading system where anyone can learn how many percentage of the tax payers money will go where and will not go somewhere else. Also the names of the Global Home Citizen(GHC)/Finnish persons who suffer from prostitution and aids because of prostitutions are mentioned as well as the names of the citizen who died in the surgery line because or had serious health damages of the decision make to one way or another. An voter, who is not then a kid on whose behalf must be decided because Kekkonen did it too or offer a service of size of an army group, in a democracy may instantly start to discuss matters important in his or her life and amaze why ten millions are taken out of surgeries to support instead building more controlling Finnish government and to ban for example buying the sex. TO enable decision making being a service which is worth of a tax payers money it starts with a practising of a respecting money. Then putting two coins on a each side of the table. The doctor comes and says t the politic patient that coin in the left is an investor coin. Can You appreciate it? When the re-training of the Finnish politic gives marks he or she has understood then the similar value of the coin on the right side of the table is introduced and told it to be a tax payer’s money. When the patient start naturally smile laugh or belittle this coin. It is taken away and member is put to a dark room alone without a bread and water. However this is does not have to repeat perhaps more than few minutes. When the test situation is repeated some of the present politics can be re-elected to the parliament so that they can give experience for the new generation of the politics who has no difficulty to dissect or treat tax payers money differently from an investor or employer money. An attitude change alone mean millions of euros of savings. Together with controlling tools, which is the public easy to read report method it means we shrink probably the present public sector in half and what the more it serves with more respect and friendliness the citizen. All this only because the government and parliament did made a discovery who is their employer and why. Such an friendly attitude change in people in Finland means that it is kept as a natural sign of the quality and respect of the work the political service for the people needs always a report to an employer. Explanation of the political decision making in the parliament must be with each decision making in normal cases with one A4 length ”Executive Summary” of a simple common language presents in internet or government telly. To note the government Telly it is good to remind unlike the present YLE the true, righteous as well religiously correct government Telly dos not make mistakes. I.e. government telly supports only the parliament decisions and weather forecasts at the maximum it does not try to fool citizen why it is not showing any movies or entertainment. This to guarantee everybody can understand what is government and why it was elected to treat over citizens money. To give an example of inspiriting righteousness in the present society Yleisradio will be given three years time to start to seek advertisers or its employees new job. The invalids and whose health is damaged and who want to stay will be taken for a government telly and paid at least for some time protective salary even the personnel outnumbered for some time. The healthy personnel can find or create the new jobs in three years in the free modern markets. The new policy of a proactivity means telling the honest truth to everybody asap which is the biggest respect any person can achieve. Those who has difficulty to let old ”lie them and make them run like chickens” can read orientation program from government websites which is organised by one invalid volunteer with 2 pages maximum. Truth and extraordinary long transiting periods in Finland with the case YLE is to be amazed in the world and first laughed but when counted with all of the societal costs together by Mr. Hunet or someone able to make order into a governmental chaos it is proved that in transit period and early warning of firing (EWF) is the one everyone is the happiest with. My interest bears no giving thanks talks t ex-YLE but it can be given a great thanks for a fine decades long service which belonged to the authoritarian ear in politics when people were forced to pay for example of a political TV channel. Such an obsolete ideas in a modern world is unbearable which is why Finnish government stops to use governmental services insulting humans and democratic principles common in all around the world in developed democracies. While these ideals, borrowed from my fictitious book, may feel too dreamy yet I would think about electing person generally I would go and vote rather for individuals who would not belong to any party. Parties were working in old societies were power was suddenly coming faceless. Up to the recent centuries we had monarchies and we have faces to hate or love. We do not handle yet the period of transiting to a democracies. The biggest mistake in the road to a freedom was to let go of faces. Faceless power becomes powerless during next decade. As much I can promise as a prophet. I would personally tend to choose in elections rather a person who would provably never have to be a member of any political ice hockey team, which I regard a proof of lopsided ideals and working with hardly a half of the 360 degrees attitude. A modern or then only forthcoming future politic (Tip: you can vote for me in next parliament) instead would try to support things for the people not for parties. I expect many might bypass this keeping it childish idealism. However I wonder why I never hear any reasoning for attitudes of the traditions. I would be personally feel myself more respected a citizen if the politic would try to somehow give without any further inquiries give free willing comments and good education in a government telly (which is allowed to show only items for general education; weather forecasts and give medical tips, no movies and fun stuff..remember!:) so that every citizen would understand if there is reason to go t the net and start to check if the politic is now re-allocating scarce tax payers money in a direction which is odd and not service for the country. Then on a next elections there would be clear working list to check and for everybody to either support and re-elect such a candidate or then drop out for a good established reason. In reason to drop out candidates could be a low level of a communication and education given to people. A sex ban presently suggested might be here the example. However personally I do not suffer a lot sex is banned in Finland for outcasts. I am not sexually too passionate which the long celibacy is the proof. Also I would leave this country anyway right when I have collected the hundred thousand euros to establish a life at somewhere else. Being however patriotic and good friend of Captain Hunet I think I want to serve my country by helping its kids and future decision makers before I go. To tell You what bothers me is probably what most politics are not worried about at all. The intellect. As far as I am concerned and aware of this world we survive rather not because of the muscle to dictate something when we are in a power position but to have endurance. To have endurance means not having endurable body but endurable values. They are a lot tougher and they halt panzers and aeroplanes. Please try to remember this. With intellect You can assess the given resources in anywhere You are or what You deal; time, money, body,... Sometimes a speech of an candidate may be the key for his or her soul..stay in tune and listen..why someone says ..well something.. In the beginning I said how I some political candidate said how our world is always more an more quickly changing. I think if our world is really so quickly changing as some political figures are saying I wonder why no-one logically presents anything as a conclusion? E.g. we need then more intellect than experience. That would have been at least a thought. Then we could have even test if the candidate speak something which can be true or false or it can be verified in a sense to have even an opinion. E.g. is it so that in a quickly changing environment it is the experience which rules the survival? Then somebody should have answer to one’s own claim. However we are not ruthlessness t our candidates because we probably respect the authority so much even in electives when we should have the responsibility to vote for our selves and for our kids. Do You think You remember this better when I was a bit ruthless? To give You a thought. what if You at your age today or at time when You grow older You remember these debates today and mild questions which never revealed anything important in a democracy would then affect that someday we might enjoy the good recruitment process for the key number one trustee and there would be an interviewer who would use an interrogator tactics but would appear to us like a little angel. To make a good question might be need to build in a dark, delivered in a fog so like a good ice hockey player You make a question which seems to come to the right but surprises from the left. Then You have squeeze the lemon of the citron made an service for your country and for the democracy of the people. Such thought is rarely nowadays seen. However why Do You think there should not be more real demands for servants of the people. I To continue from previous example I got enchanted t the quickly spinning world and masses in a heavens which accelerates their speed. To think if to survive in such a chaotic spinning whirlwind it is intellect, why not then support the intellect? If I believe I can logic right. Intellect grows not in a sofa where sits a person dealing with traditions. Making routine decision and having a plenty of pop corn and ale to snap. I have an odd idea intellect is morelikely a jewellery which may develop to a brilliant when there is problems to cope with. However while in Finland this must be whispered. However an optimal amount !!! Not too much. Too much pressure will spoil the jewelleries and then no one had them. I think the Finnish society is currently letting happen to the small people quite a crime who are unable to defend themselves or their rights. This I mean speaking of a civil crisis I think the poor people has all of the time it while in the legal system there seems no dates mentioned how many dates one must be without a food and medicine i.e. when the social welfare and equivalent lowest income must be paid by the county or a government. I would suggest there should be some dates to avoid too many Hannu Karpo interview program to develop with 4H kotitalouskokki/household advisor to consult if it is possible to stay alive with social welfare or not. Actually if someone does not like this story do not blame me I am only trying to imitate Andy Rooney on a next. I am not personally a lover or hater no more of a rich or poor, ugly or a beauty. It just interests me why at times we have a leadership based so strongly on traditions and authority taken face-value.So little of appreciation of a logic and thought. This should be a prove of the historical time we should be spinning always faster and faster according Finnish politics. Turning the claim of the fast changing world to the perspective of my own I would tend to push the brakes a lot in the front of the people who make base one speeches on clichees. I understand I could be theoretically as well wrong but presently I can only be right as I lack the solid opinion of that politic. This is why to have a good conversation to be succesfull or opinions to have some relevance and service for a citizens in anyones life I would tend to trigger the honesty at least that much I could follow if someone is having an opinion or not. I am a personally skeptic our world would be spinning any faster. A short glimpse of the history tells a human mind and the capacity to live faster or slower has not been changed. To inspirate an ideal to youth ( I consider every citizen should be seen as kid from the point of view of president candidate) the world is moving faster does not bear too much a fruit on my opinion. We are more connected intellectually in a modern world and when one fucks up there is of course potentially a 6 billion of a global democrats to have personal opinion but it is unlikely to happen. Only really reason why world; our human world would move faster or even a moved a bit would be more likely to be expected if the masses of the people connected now through medias intellectually would also develop in the depth of a communication the could share feelings and adapt to politically meaningful similarities which might trigger to feel to move things in own country or own body to another country. Presently the faster moving world is an clichee but true in working places where a tyrant has placed the coach and this new boss would like to have a bigger house and wants it so much is ready to kill employee. Metaphorically speaking of course. Such and asshole officially called boss will arrive to a sales meeting claiming the same as our candidates who rides on triggering fear in a citizen when as studied in millions of studies in the times of crisis people will tell the leader lion who roars convincingly. This is familiar to me while my dad yelled to me as a kid I too shelter. Even nowadays only seeing him I loose my nerves and collapse mentally. He started his career at the age of four. HE was a natural talent if to believe his tales. The wartime helped but when he yelled ”Get Down” in Tampere, Finland when not bombed everybody around got down. He just got intuit. I hate the mechanism and I would personally die like a flower which is watered too much, however I understand that it creates an instinct to everybody to wait for a bomb when someone is rehearsing and yelling ”Get Down” ”Shut up”. After such a scholarship You see devil in the every corner. Good for so because it is not a bad service for a democracy to go and see if there is a devil or just an false alarm. As an educated voter I would not go for a cheap when traditional politic is triggering the fear factor of a voter. I would take it as a cheap. Everyone understand people will do anything when they safety is questioned. If You are willing to do anything. Would you describe Your actions are based on a good research? I guess then You agree voting for a politic manipulating of the voter is not an deed which modern would wish to support. I have been the undeniable birthright to born for a looser. The best jobs I have excel as a salesman were those when the it was something no one needed. This is why I am familiar with old fashioned ”worlds spin faster”-slogans to start something t have a sell. fourty years old fatso to threaten the young twenty years kids to sell shit and saying the boys are in the brink of being fired if the old sales record will not break is very logical argument to manage while any real arguments does not exist. Such is a politics. To say I am full merchandise to be bargained for a good price to any party who brings me a million dollar or euros worth of the houses cars and other goods. I can then attack politically correct against any other party and start the ice hockey match. Putting voter to run however so directly like in Finland our electives does lacks creativity. More power, more money to have sex and feel sexy must be earned in todays world with better lies. I try to help as much as I can the Finnish politic to excel. That is patriotic deed indeed. To help more I say right what I think. I think the smartest, the real angels on our shoulders are left on the reserves to emerge. Or Do You use diamonds daily? Put best troops to sit on trenches? Middle of the routines it is hard to find who guides and keeps on the eye for the missteps. I am so old, heard, being influenced, studied so many persons I am rarely taken or so pleased I could imagine to stand up and salute someone as a ”Sir” at least feel joy when doing it. I think Prince Charles is a such power figure I would make an exception. He has gone trough a mill of a grindstones hardly easy to pass. Most important for the rest of the world; he appears a friendly, supportive and approachable. Not personally a power seeking in authoritarian ways. Being a kid and seeking a knowledge, to survive in this world, I hardly could imagine better father figure, a knight, a political servant for a people than he is. Of course serving for the country and its people has been in his blood for long. It is hardly an accident. He has no personal power biases to interrupt the trust of a common man which we all at the bottom are. This makes me think press is not pressuring hard enough but the political leadership should be set a guards like old monarchy to see they can act. For the interest of the nation and the people. I guess there is not a single person in this world to be so clever who would not benefit the healthy advice of a mom and dad. Who would remind our politics: ”Now You went too far, Go home and do Your lessons” might be a good for the politics. I mean those, raising from the lower class of the people who has power bias as a birthright.
*This text is a prologue to the larger article introducing how I analyse and study things using as an example of the example of the movie GroundHog Day and its nice beaver, Punxutawni Phil.
Merry Christmas for every kidspirited, 20th December 2005 Copyright Mr. Janne Huttunen
PS. Sorry for lacking time to stylize the text yet. The quality of the text will improve
During the spring 2006
links to already avalaible samples of the books
http://otherbooks.blogspot.com/
HOW TO LEARN? ...TO DO THE RESEARCH?
(note: paragraphs align somedays in www somedays not, sorry this day was such so be patient)
First of all to remind someone who is not too conscious yet about own personality, which regards myself too, I think it is good to remind the research is not the sexiest way to spend a life. However if You lack money, consequently being weak state of health You probably are drawned to the research occupations. It is hard to imagine someone would be interested to research being already intelligent and healthy. I would have never open a book if I could have only open the legs of a pretty woman. Starting a career is to examine Your self. Because You engage to do it You are to find a number of faults. I understood early no-one ever would buy my books so choose to write only to prove I exist. I have no kids. I also have no money, whence no dignity. As result the outcome is what life would force such a loosers to do anyway. I will tell all my advices for free for people having better anatomy. I might even beg them to read me. My recent accomplishment as a researcher is I am a some kind of an evolutionary oddling who thought to have born healthy and successful but forgot this would last exactly thirty years. The latter part of the life story concentrates to give tips that working with number of dates will results a score even a declining level of percentages. After the success rate drops below 10 per cent You start to feel an slight humiliation. Still work will bear the fruit. It just have to be done more. I am however lazy. My counter strike was to revenge on females and I made myself unattainable. I created an inner female to have everything else but sex. After a five years celibacy I got horny. I started to depict in net how painful and unhealthy it is for a person to not use his or her senses . I guess somebody saw the writing while about the same time I find out I had been wrong on my political knowledge. Buying sex in Finland had not been banned in Finland but once I started to express my needs it was made such. I guess after I had opened my mouth politics probably had an idea banning the sex all over the country would help to get rid of the not needed societal outcasts; like bachelors and invalids. I could not agree what could kill more efficiently but banning people to use the strongest need in human lives; the sex and have it in a way God meant. Not making excuses of the existence of humiliating rubber dildos or vaginas and insult the God. As a researcher we are soon guided to the lakes of the origins of the bad bags of the ”good governor”. It shows there could be printed a booklet which list how to govern and exploit the humanity and how nation and people has been successfully cheated and ordinary people lives wasted through centuries by power seeking politics. However, I would write it. No one would buy. I tell You free. Regulator Tip One is to channel this most powerful force in the life. The sex instinct. To ban it. We have a strong religion and wilful armies to attack anywhere a prophet points an arm. To allow it we have people who love life, are peaceful, friendly and the question the governmental authority by asking questions like kid: ”Why Do You tease Daddy and Mother. Why Can You not let us live?” if You are a researcher and You start to ask what is the nature of the things. Why something move? Why something is foxed on spot? What is it waiting? Why the other stone moved now? Then You may make discoveries which may be kept embarrassing from a point of view. For some reasons we have choosed to live most of our history through religious societies. If You can explain this from the scientific point of view, please give me link where I can study Your perspectives. To support the intent of a more democratic and safer society If I only would have excessive time at my disposal I could probably list the decades and centuries when buying sex was a part of the societal life. Then decades when it was strictly denied. However I must satisfy to give only the idea. Sometimes in my country there is asked why the people will not vote more actively. I can ad only my story. I have voted in every elections. However why? I guess because my parents forced me to do so.They were good to turn people«s head what it comes to politics. They even could turn my grandmother head at her eighties to vote the right wing even she had voted for the life the social democrats and been through the life the poor as a person financially can be. I think for now on I have to rethink my attitude to support people to vote. I can not no more do it because I have personally difficulty to understands speeches which does not seem to tell the honesty or give too much of a clarity of the idea or the person. Basically I would like to support a people to have a good life. However I guess it comes by roundtrips. Personally feel problematic to vote for a person who belongs to a party. I do not understand what kind of people or person is if he needs for his or her support a party. However, before getting into that lets take a short glimpse to the present politics in Finland. My glimpse was to see a short period in telly where someone (it does bear no meaning whoever it was) said that someone should be elected because we live always a more quickly changing environment than previously. It was enough for me to get out of the watching the program. I could hardly imagine more than thinking thank You boys and girls You are establishing your arguments still on a clichés. Also I did not understood what an earth the candidate would have selected to do in an everaccelerating universe would he or she be a ping pong player or would the Sitting Bull attitude been the choice? It was left to mystery while not needed to argument in any way. Sadly we choose to the most important jobs a person without too many questions made. I have no more doubts how Hitler could lead the nation to a destruction. It was probably banned to ask to make any psychological test before recruitment the head of a state at his time. I lack knowledge is there any development in the recruiting process or are we still a kids who needs a strong leadership? Why in the earth would an independent citizen would need a string leadership. It should be totally contrary the case nowadays. President should be our friend number one. Not some distant personality to salute. But here we come to the question of a power and the democracy. Electing the presidency in anno domini 2006 in Finland seems to be still electing an authority. However has anyone ever asked why? Or is such a question banned. If so ,why? On my own thinking safest place to live is a democracy where any individual has exact rights with a president. Of course excluding the authority when to relate to a task is able to specify legally. Such wishes means working ideals. Ideals today’s world will not jus roll on themselves nor perfectly. At basin in our hearts we are wanting humans not servants, unless we are forced to. However from the point of view of a nation the politic should be only selected a servants, the humble men, the philosophist at heart. Philosopher means not a fragile one-sided poet watching the birds only but able to experience and see the life with 360 degrees. To a trustee number one of the people: the president this is important. I would not take a face-value everyone who set them as a candidates has such abilities. Everything can be learned but being the service for simply to everybody might take a 1000 years of studies from some of us. I belong to this group. I could never work as a president more than a few minutes at maximum. I have personal power complexes and I am too short sighted and I honesty does not love people I actually hate them. However do we citizens as a voter know how open is the personality of our candidates if they only use clichés? Speaking of the power complexes and electing presidents how many of us takes care to see that living in a post-religious societies the president can also be projected upon our own and the nation’s sexual wishes. At least when the head figure is elected in an fairly undemocratic process concerning the recruiting methods are not used, not even to speak of astrology for instance we might project our hidden unlived sexual fantasies to our candidates. If we need a good fuck we tend to watch action films, we speak with eagerminded and aggressive people and we laugh when somebody says something very punctual in a debate. However if we would live in a country where You could by same safe-sex services which would not mean disease spreading risks being more involved than when the majority is doing it we would have less need to project expectations to the president as a high priest or a high priestess. Speaking of power, I would not personally need to see a president as a point of view of the army commander. I would like to live in a society where everybody could laugh on my writings and say. ”Hey what an idiot. I learned nothing, Old fool go home”. However sadly I felt some of my thoughts might not always be remembered too well by everyone. I have a personal intuition, meaning I only guess the attachment of ”army commander” or ”a commander in a chief” to have strict overrule of al the land,- air,-sea force and the submarines to submiss the land is something which is a poor advertising of the presidency. Sadly, such a an acts together with long winding talks of civil crisis management may make a generation of the youth and their grand pas and grand mass perhaps believe the nations are on the brink of the great war and it might be a good idea to select for a president someone who is at least a corporal and can run the mile under five minutes. I disagree the president shoals be aggressive or combatant. First of all because I would be worried for such a presidents physical condition and intellect. Being aggressive, decisive and commanding is not an especially skill needing task or a personal trait. Look, even I can do it. Every individual born are able to become aggressive and defend if only life forces. Perhaps as we have good possibility to join a wealth we might forget it is not a skill or a personality trait but for true it is a universal survival instinct. I would personally enjoy to wake up in a society where someone would gently bring me a bucket of chocolate saying,”Oh please do not bother to write such a things everyone knows them already”. However I feel many of us live still in a yesterdays world if they think a woman or a small and philosophy looking man would make a less decisive army commander at a crisis. I hope what I say here would be not a surprise to anyone while I claim there is also not a single government who would be fooled that if president is educated, well mannered and have a capacity to be friendly and charming Finns would lack somehow decisive army or generals in service. This is why I personally do not like too much our presidents being attached to the Tank brigades filmed and interviewed them with army. Of course this attitude would make myself too the editor of the thirties, however I am still worry such an imagery pinpoint subconsciously too narrow image of the presidential tasks in the minds of the people. especially suggesting loose connotations e.g. to the old people of this country who has a lot of emotions belonged to a past and early history of this nation.The will to defend to the county has nothing to do with a president. It is the people, the army and its leadership. On the contrary it presents the fact the president should be able to influence also the more but foreign political relationship. Or then we should have another president or a person with a face who takes care of the interest of the citizens daily lives. I think it is irresponsible to leave people of the Finland to the mercy of the party politics. Here I get back to the thing I said earlier. For me it seems we live in a time where still it is okay to think governing is made by parties. Again parties are faceless and they do not have to be responsible. I think when there is not a person who does not need to explain its acts I would not personally trust such an governing principles . I face this everyday. The amount of time and work is wasted while there is no cotact persons too often. There is only belief someone will continue from..then where. Al over again from the beginning e.g. At least I feel in my country there is odd political atmosphere. This I refer to an thought where it is demanded a ”discipline” from party member, so that they would vote...how..against.the people who elected them. I personally could not be more fearful of such an act. I have no idea how a democracy can be fulfilled when there is parties who demands group discipline. I think it sounds only a dangerous. If I would like to increase the safety of the society and have less taxes paid it would mean enabling more democracy as well as the rights and responsibility of an individual to grow. Being strict as well it means the strategy will not be undermined only for short term ideas. I rather would be a member of the society where there would not fear any party to get over another and have ”discipline” like in a some kind of authoritian historical societies we have only a nightmares to work for and generations to suffer from the weak decisions in a democracy when it was given step by step to people who say something is so efficient when no one else had to tell. However we live in a democracies. Majority of the people loves stability, place to work, friendliness and respect. While in xmas everyone is nice. I will also want and give You a political gift. It is something which Mao Tsetung might have as well give to the nice xmas present. It is a little pamphlet continuing the list above. ...Level of education of an individuals will rise. Governing principles must anticipate and walk with this. Sooner in Finland we adapt the policies supporting the individual and brain power instead of controlling citizens, sooner such early innovating societies gets the competitive edge of such a brains in a gratitude to feel well and nurtured. Thankful citizens joying of somewhat efficient Finnish free education brings out of the Finn an independendent and amazingly self-responsible citizen who governs her or him own tasks needing less bureaucracy and services from a Finnish government. Open democracies are supported in Finland. When people find the benefits of the open democracies in Finland they vote for leaders who are open personalities carrying no such a secrets which the voters would have to regret later like waging a war against the former Soviet Union. An educated Finnish voter can demand the quality and he or she creates models to interview and test the candidates to make secure the promises is delivered. If they are not there will be kept constant ranking,- and work lists of the deed done or left undone by parliament servants i.e. the elected politically voted members in a Finnish parliament. The ranking list of the responsibility to be on the spot and cash in election promises as well as the work list with spend hours are publicly and democratically for everyone to see in an internet or equivalent democratic mode. The tax payers money will be respected in shockingly radical way referring to the present state, meaning the expenditures will be explained so that common voter can understand without any further education nor waste of time why taxes was paid such an amount and why it makes or makes not sense too support such a government by giving up money and trust of one«s own personal life. During a transit period which takes many decades for Finnish parliament to organise things in cost-effective manner the volunteer groups of invalids and long term unemployed will help the government and parliament out from the fearful crisis. ”Respecting an individual and tax payer”-politic works towards it ideals building an internet with voluntary budgets and control system t help the government save tax payers and its employers money. Presently the employers of the government does not control the expenditure the of the employee in Finland. As a natural result our government and parliament is asking help and advices because for an employee task is not to control the employers money but vice versa. Easy to control system first in the internet make also easy for parliament member to study the society to understand what expenditure is needed and what is not. Presently the expenditure is so chaotic and big as an ocean there is no single person who can manage it. Or at least no more at the available. Easy to read governmental spending control enables Finnish parliament member to get realistic picture of the worlds and stop laughing and not being on the spot when decision are maked for the best interest for the Finnish voters. Earning the parliamentary salary is one of the first issues to discussed. But rather briefly. If the present salary prevents for example the left wingers to adapt to the situation of the poor my suggestion is the left winger will be paid only one quarter of the salary the right wingers will have. Such a personal adaptation to the needs of the voters will help the daily politics as well as to respect voters. If the voters have been very rich the elective should have at least ten times higher salary than a left winger. Logical outcomes in a personal life would help the elective to follow not the party group discipline but the voter group discipline. The control system in the internet which is not included into a parliamentary budget because if it would be it costs would be automatically quadruple is in first years reading system where anyone can learn how many percentage of the tax payers money will go where and will not go somewhere else. Also the names of the Global Home Citizen(GHC)/Finnish persons who suffer from prostitution and aids because of prostitutions are mentioned as well as the names of the citizen who died in the surgery line because or had serious health damages of the decision make to one way or another. An voter, who is not then a kid on whose behalf must be decided because Kekkonen did it too or offer a service of size of an army group, in a democracy may instantly start to discuss matters important in his or her life and amaze why ten millions are taken out of surgeries to support instead building more controlling Finnish government and to ban for example buying the sex. TO enable decision making being a service which is worth of a tax payers money it starts with a practising of a respecting money. Then putting two coins on a each side of the table. The doctor comes and says t the politic patient that coin in the left is an investor coin. Can You appreciate it? When the re-training of the Finnish politic gives marks he or she has understood then the similar value of the coin on the right side of the table is introduced and told it to be a tax payer’s money. When the patient start naturally smile laugh or belittle this coin. It is taken away and member is put to a dark room alone without a bread and water. However this is does not have to repeat perhaps more than few minutes. When the test situation is repeated some of the present politics can be re-elected to the parliament so that they can give experience for the new generation of the politics who has no difficulty to dissect or treat tax payers money differently from an investor or employer money. An attitude change alone mean millions of euros of savings. Together with controlling tools, which is the public easy to read report method it means we shrink probably the present public sector in half and what the more it serves with more respect and friendliness the citizen. All this only because the government and parliament did made a discovery who is their employer and why. Such an friendly attitude change in people in Finland means that it is kept as a natural sign of the quality and respect of the work the political service for the people needs always a report to an employer. Explanation of the political decision making in the parliament must be with each decision making in normal cases with one A4 length ”Executive Summary” of a simple common language presents in internet or government telly. To note the government Telly it is good to remind unlike the present YLE the true, righteous as well religiously correct government Telly dos not make mistakes. I.e. government telly supports only the parliament decisions and weather forecasts at the maximum it does not try to fool citizen why it is not showing any movies or entertainment. This to guarantee everybody can understand what is government and why it was elected to treat over citizens money. To give an example of inspiriting righteousness in the present society Yleisradio will be given three years time to start to seek advertisers or its employees new job. The invalids and whose health is damaged and who want to stay will be taken for a government telly and paid at least for some time protective salary even the personnel outnumbered for some time. The healthy personnel can find or create the new jobs in three years in the free modern markets. The new policy of a proactivity means telling the honest truth to everybody asap which is the biggest respect any person can achieve. Those who has difficulty to let old ”lie them and make them run like chickens” can read orientation program from government websites which is organised by one invalid volunteer with 2 pages maximum. Truth and extraordinary long transiting periods in Finland with the case YLE is to be amazed in the world and first laughed but when counted with all of the societal costs together by Mr. Hunet or someone able to make order into a governmental chaos it is proved that in transit period and early warning of firing (EWF) is the one everyone is the happiest with. My interest bears no giving thanks talks t ex-YLE but it can be given a great thanks for a fine decades long service which belonged to the authoritarian ear in politics when people were forced to pay for example of a political TV channel. Such an obsolete ideas in a modern world is unbearable which is why Finnish government stops to use governmental services insulting humans and democratic principles common in all around the world in developed democracies. While these ideals, borrowed from my fictitious book, may feel too dreamy yet I would think about electing person generally I would go and vote rather for individuals who would not belong to any party. Parties were working in old societies were power was suddenly coming faceless. Up to the recent centuries we had monarchies and we have faces to hate or love. We do not handle yet the period of transiting to a democracies. The biggest mistake in the road to a freedom was to let go of faces. Faceless power becomes powerless during next decade. As much I can promise as a prophet. I would personally tend to choose in elections rather a person who would provably never have to be a member of any political ice hockey team, which I regard a proof of lopsided ideals and working with hardly a half of the 360 degrees attitude. A modern or then only forthcoming future politic (Tip: you can vote for me in next parliament) instead would try to support things for the people not for parties. I expect many might bypass this keeping it childish idealism. However I wonder why I never hear any reasoning for attitudes of the traditions. I would be personally feel myself more respected a citizen if the politic would try to somehow give without any further inquiries give free willing comments and good education in a government telly (which is allowed to show only items for general education; weather forecasts and give medical tips, no movies and fun stuff..remember!:) so that every citizen would understand if there is reason to go t the net and start to check if the politic is now re-allocating scarce tax payers money in a direction which is odd and not service for the country. Then on a next elections there would be clear working list to check and for everybody to either support and re-elect such a candidate or then drop out for a good established reason. In reason to drop out candidates could be a low level of a communication and education given to people. A sex ban presently suggested might be here the example. However personally I do not suffer a lot sex is banned in Finland for outcasts. I am not sexually too passionate which the long celibacy is the proof. Also I would leave this country anyway right when I have collected the hundred thousand euros to establish a life at somewhere else. Being however patriotic and good friend of Captain Hunet I think I want to serve my country by helping its kids and future decision makers before I go. To tell You what bothers me is probably what most politics are not worried about at all. The intellect. As far as I am concerned and aware of this world we survive rather not because of the muscle to dictate something when we are in a power position but to have endurance. To have endurance means not having endurable body but endurable values. They are a lot tougher and they halt panzers and aeroplanes. Please try to remember this. With intellect You can assess the given resources in anywhere You are or what You deal; time, money, body,... Sometimes a speech of an candidate may be the key for his or her soul..stay in tune and listen..why someone says ..well something.. In the beginning I said how I some political candidate said how our world is always more an more quickly changing. I think if our world is really so quickly changing as some political figures are saying I wonder why no-one logically presents anything as a conclusion? E.g. we need then more intellect than experience. That would have been at least a thought. Then we could have even test if the candidate speak something which can be true or false or it can be verified in a sense to have even an opinion. E.g. is it so that in a quickly changing environment it is the experience which rules the survival? Then somebody should have answer to one’s own claim. However we are not ruthlessness t our candidates because we probably respect the authority so much even in electives when we should have the responsibility to vote for our selves and for our kids. Do You think You remember this better when I was a bit ruthless? To give You a thought. what if You at your age today or at time when You grow older You remember these debates today and mild questions which never revealed anything important in a democracy would then affect that someday we might enjoy the good recruitment process for the key number one trustee and there would be an interviewer who would use an interrogator tactics but would appear to us like a little angel. To make a good question might be need to build in a dark, delivered in a fog so like a good ice hockey player You make a question which seems to come to the right but surprises from the left. Then You have squeeze the lemon of the citron made an service for your country and for the democracy of the people. Such thought is rarely nowadays seen. However why Do You think there should not be more real demands for servants of the people. I To continue from previous example I got enchanted t the quickly spinning world and masses in a heavens which accelerates their speed. To think if to survive in such a chaotic spinning whirlwind it is intellect, why not then support the intellect? If I believe I can logic right. Intellect grows not in a sofa where sits a person dealing with traditions. Making routine decision and having a plenty of pop corn and ale to snap. I have an odd idea intellect is morelikely a jewellery which may develop to a brilliant when there is problems to cope with. However while in Finland this must be whispered. However an optimal amount !!! Not too much. Too much pressure will spoil the jewelleries and then no one had them. I think the Finnish society is currently letting happen to the small people quite a crime who are unable to defend themselves or their rights. This I mean speaking of a civil crisis I think the poor people has all of the time it while in the legal system there seems no dates mentioned how many dates one must be without a food and medicine i.e. when the social welfare and equivalent lowest income must be paid by the county or a government. I would suggest there should be some dates to avoid too many Hannu Karpo interview program to develop with 4H kotitalouskokki/household advisor to consult if it is possible to stay alive with social welfare or not. Actually if someone does not like this story do not blame me I am only trying to imitate Andy Rooney on a next. I am not personally a lover or hater no more of a rich or poor, ugly or a beauty. It just interests me why at times we have a leadership based so strongly on traditions and authority taken face-value.So little of appreciation of a logic and thought. This should be a prove of the historical time we should be spinning always faster and faster according Finnish politics. Turning the claim of the fast changing world to the perspective of my own I would tend to push the brakes a lot in the front of the people who make base one speeches on clichees. I understand I could be theoretically as well wrong but presently I can only be right as I lack the solid opinion of that politic. This is why to have a good conversation to be succesfull or opinions to have some relevance and service for a citizens in anyones life I would tend to trigger the honesty at least that much I could follow if someone is having an opinion or not. I am a personally skeptic our world would be spinning any faster. A short glimpse of the history tells a human mind and the capacity to live faster or slower has not been changed. To inspirate an ideal to youth ( I consider every citizen should be seen as kid from the point of view of president candidate) the world is moving faster does not bear too much a fruit on my opinion. We are more connected intellectually in a modern world and when one fucks up there is of course potentially a 6 billion of a global democrats to have personal opinion but it is unlikely to happen. Only really reason why world; our human world would move faster or even a moved a bit would be more likely to be expected if the masses of the people connected now through medias intellectually would also develop in the depth of a communication the could share feelings and adapt to politically meaningful similarities which might trigger to feel to move things in own country or own body to another country. Presently the faster moving world is an clichee but true in working places where a tyrant has placed the coach and this new boss would like to have a bigger house and wants it so much is ready to kill employee. Metaphorically speaking of course. Such and asshole officially called boss will arrive to a sales meeting claiming the same as our candidates who rides on triggering fear in a citizen when as studied in millions of studies in the times of crisis people will tell the leader lion who roars convincingly. This is familiar to me while my dad yelled to me as a kid I too shelter. Even nowadays only seeing him I loose my nerves and collapse mentally. He started his career at the age of four. HE was a natural talent if to believe his tales. The wartime helped but when he yelled ”Get Down” in Tampere, Finland when not bombed everybody around got down. He just got intuit. I hate the mechanism and I would personally die like a flower which is watered too much, however I understand that it creates an instinct to everybody to wait for a bomb when someone is rehearsing and yelling ”Get Down” ”Shut up”. After such a scholarship You see devil in the every corner. Good for so because it is not a bad service for a democracy to go and see if there is a devil or just an false alarm. As an educated voter I would not go for a cheap when traditional politic is triggering the fear factor of a voter. I would take it as a cheap. Everyone understand people will do anything when they safety is questioned. If You are willing to do anything. Would you describe Your actions are based on a good research? I guess then You agree voting for a politic manipulating of the voter is not an deed which modern would wish to support. I have been the undeniable birthright to born for a looser. The best jobs I have excel as a salesman were those when the it was something no one needed. This is why I am familiar with old fashioned ”worlds spin faster”-slogans to start something t have a sell. fourty years old fatso to threaten the young twenty years kids to sell shit and saying the boys are in the brink of being fired if the old sales record will not break is very logical argument to manage while any real arguments does not exist. Such is a politics. To say I am full merchandise to be bargained for a good price to any party who brings me a million dollar or euros worth of the houses cars and other goods. I can then attack politically correct against any other party and start the ice hockey match. Putting voter to run however so directly like in Finland our electives does lacks creativity. More power, more money to have sex and feel sexy must be earned in todays world with better lies. I try to help as much as I can the Finnish politic to excel. That is patriotic deed indeed. To help more I say right what I think. I think the smartest, the real angels on our shoulders are left on the reserves to emerge. Or Do You use diamonds daily? Put best troops to sit on trenches? Middle of the routines it is hard to find who guides and keeps on the eye for the missteps. I am so old, heard, being influenced, studied so many persons I am rarely taken or so pleased I could imagine to stand up and salute someone as a ”Sir” at least feel joy when doing it. I think Prince Charles is a such power figure I would make an exception. He has gone trough a mill of a grindstones hardly easy to pass. Most important for the rest of the world; he appears a friendly, supportive and approachable. Not personally a power seeking in authoritarian ways. Being a kid and seeking a knowledge, to survive in this world, I hardly could imagine better father figure, a knight, a political servant for a people than he is. Of course serving for the country and its people has been in his blood for long. It is hardly an accident. He has no personal power biases to interrupt the trust of a common man which we all at the bottom are. This makes me think press is not pressuring hard enough but the political leadership should be set a guards like old monarchy to see they can act. For the interest of the nation and the people. I guess there is not a single person in this world to be so clever who would not benefit the healthy advice of a mom and dad. Who would remind our politics: ”Now You went too far, Go home and do Your lessons” might be a good for the politics. I mean those, raising from the lower class of the people who has power bias as a birthright.
*This text is a prologue to the larger article introducing how I analyse and study things using as an example of the example of the movie GroundHog Day and its nice beaver, Punxutawni Phil.
Merry Christmas for every kidspirited, 20th December 2005 Copyright Mr. Janne Huttunen
PS. Sorry for lacking time to stylize the text yet. The quality of the text will improve
During the spring 2006
links to already avalaible samples of the books
http://otherbooks.blogspot.com/
Vastaukset 3
Vanhimmat
Eikö ollutkin mielenkiintoista?
kopiointi http://keskustelu.suomi24.fi/ohje/
Kieli http://www.suomi24.fi/opastus/kayttajaehdot/
ehkä vielä tuhannen vuoden päästä
voi helpottaa kun herää demokratiassa