Kuuluisa kreationisti "Dr." Hovind on luemma murtautunut johonkin
asuntoon, otettu kiinni ja pantu putkaankin.
Oikeudenkäynti marraskuussa.
------------------------------------------
Sun, 08 Sep 2002 22:14:30 talk.origins Thread 767 of 793
Lines 45 Re: Hovind pleads Not Guilty -- Trial Date 18 Responses
[email protected] at Optimum Online
Newsgroups: talk.origins
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 17:15:10 0000 (UTC), Louann Miller
wrote:
>On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 15:50:22 0000 (UTC), Harlequin
>wrote:
>
>>Kent Hovind's set for court appearence in October over the building
>>code charge:
>>http://205.152.130.8/cv_web_1b.asp?ucase_id=62294168
>>
>>For the assult, battery, and burglary charges, Hovind has plead
>>not guilty and has requested that he represent himself. Trial
>>is set for November.
>>http://205.152.130.8/cv_web_1b.asp?ucase_id=12619523
>>
>>It is possible, though lets face it unlikely, that he could get
>>a year in slammer over all of this.
>
>The only thing that makes it at all likely is the fact that he is
>representing himself. I hear that's a phenomenally bad move even if
>you're a lawyer yourself, and I haven't heard that Hovind is one.
He tried this once before in his bankruptcy case but then appaently
realized he was in over his head and got some poor sod to represent
him at the last moment, who, again apparently, refused to continue
with Hovind's bad faith defense.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/hovind-decision.html
I suspect this will take the same story arc, with Hovind showing up at
the last moment with a lawyer, who will have to beg for an adjournment
before trying to bury that son-in-law of Hovind's who supposedly
"witnessed" him *not* performing an assault.
Whoever he gets, I feel sorry for him/her.
---------------
J. Pieret
---------------
A concise definition of legal ethics:
" . . . having been bought a lawyer is supposed to stay bought."
-- Louann Miller --
-----------------------------------
Kreationisteille on paljon tiukemmat moraalirajat. Itsensä asettamat.
Evolutionisteillehan näet
ei ole merkitystä teorian kannalta sillä oliko Newton rahansa hävinnyt
pörssikeinottelija(oli) tai laiminlöikö Einstein 1. vaimoaan tms.
Joku kreationisti täälläkin on muistaakseni aikoinaan vaatinut
minua täyttämään Dr. Hovindin miljoonaveto (todista evoluutio).
Näyttää miehellä olevan semmoinen rahapula ettei kannata.
vaivautua..
asuntoon, otettu kiinni ja pantu putkaankin.
Oikeudenkäynti marraskuussa.
------------------------------------------
Sun, 08 Sep 2002 22:14:30 talk.origins Thread 767 of 793
Lines 45 Re: Hovind pleads Not Guilty -- Trial Date 18 Responses
[email protected] at Optimum Online
Newsgroups: talk.origins
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 17:15:10 0000 (UTC), Louann Miller
wrote:
>On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 15:50:22 0000 (UTC), Harlequin
>wrote:
>
>>Kent Hovind's set for court appearence in October over the building
>>code charge:
>>http://205.152.130.8/cv_web_1b.asp?ucase_id=62294168
>>
>>For the assult, battery, and burglary charges, Hovind has plead
>>not guilty and has requested that he represent himself. Trial
>>is set for November.
>>http://205.152.130.8/cv_web_1b.asp?ucase_id=12619523
>>
>>It is possible, though lets face it unlikely, that he could get
>>a year in slammer over all of this.
>
>The only thing that makes it at all likely is the fact that he is
>representing himself. I hear that's a phenomenally bad move even if
>you're a lawyer yourself, and I haven't heard that Hovind is one.
He tried this once before in his bankruptcy case but then appaently
realized he was in over his head and got some poor sod to represent
him at the last moment, who, again apparently, refused to continue
with Hovind's bad faith defense.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/hovind-decision.html
I suspect this will take the same story arc, with Hovind showing up at
the last moment with a lawyer, who will have to beg for an adjournment
before trying to bury that son-in-law of Hovind's who supposedly
"witnessed" him *not* performing an assault.
Whoever he gets, I feel sorry for him/her.
---------------
J. Pieret
---------------
A concise definition of legal ethics:
" . . . having been bought a lawyer is supposed to stay bought."
-- Louann Miller --
-----------------------------------
Kreationisteille on paljon tiukemmat moraalirajat. Itsensä asettamat.
Evolutionisteillehan näet
ei ole merkitystä teorian kannalta sillä oliko Newton rahansa hävinnyt
pörssikeinottelija(oli) tai laiminlöikö Einstein 1. vaimoaan tms.
Joku kreationisti täälläkin on muistaakseni aikoinaan vaatinut
minua täyttämään Dr. Hovindin miljoonaveto (todista evoluutio).
Näyttää miehellä olevan semmoinen rahapula ettei kannata.
vaivautua..
Vastaukset 5
Vanhimmat
Note that the dissenting witness, Paul Jewell, is an employee of Hovind's
enterprise.
==================================================
ON 8-15-2002 AT APPROX 1400 HRS IN ESCAMBIA COUNTY FL, THE ABOVE DEFENDANT,
DR KENT E HOVIND DID WILLFULLY AND INTENTIONALLY COMMIT THE OFFENSE OF
BURGLARY, BATTERY AND-ASSAULT. ON THIS DATE DR HOVIND CAME TO THE RESIDENCE
OF HIS TENANT AT 100 CUMMINGS ST WHERE HE MADE CONTACT WITH TRUDY OWEN AT
THE FRONT DOOR AND ATTEMPTED TO PROVIDE HER WITH MONEY IN ORDER FOR HER TO
RELOCATE RESIDENCY. TRUDY OWEN SAID SHE REFUSED TO ACCEPT THE MONEY ASKING
DR HOVIND TO LEAVE AS SHE SHUT THE FRONT DOOR. DR HOVIND THEN FORCED THE
FRONT DOOR OPEN, KNOCKING MS OWEN BACKWARDS AND ENTERED INTO THE STRUCTURE
AND BEGAN YELLING LOUDLY AND ACTING IN A HOSTILE AND AGGRESSIVE MANNER,
PUTTING V/OWEN IN FEAR FOR HER SAFETY.
VICTIM CHRISTOPHER KENUI, ALSO RESIDING AT THIS RESIDENCE, ATTEMPTED TO
INTERVENE WITH THIS ALTERCATION, WHERE DR HOVIND THEN BECAME PHYSICALLY
AGGRESSIVE TOWARD KENUI, WHERE CHRISTOPHER THEN PHYSICALLY WRESTLED HIM OUT
OF HIS RESIDENCE AND ONTO THE FRONT PORCH THEN SLAMMING THE DOOR AND LOCKING
IT AND CALLING THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE TO REPORT THIS INCIDENT.
UPON MY ARRIVAL, I INTERVIEWED V/TRUDY OWEN, V/CHRISTOPHER KENUI AND
WA/ROENALINE KENUI, WHO ALL CONCURRED WITH THE SAME STATEMENT OF THE EVENT
THAT PREVIOUSLY OCCURRED. I THEN INTERVIEWED DR KENT HOVIND IN REFERENCE TO
THIS INCIDENT WHERE HE DID ADMIT TO FORCING HIS WAY INTO THE HOUSE STATING
THAT THE RESIDENCE BELONGED TO HIM AND HE WAS MERELY RENTING THIS HOME TO
TENANT OWEN AND FAMILY. DR HOVIND FURTHER STATED THAT HE WAS UNDER THE
IMPRESSION THAT HE COULD ENTER THIS RESIDENCE ANY TIME HE WANTED THEREFORE.
HE DID NOT FEEL THAT HE COMMITTED A CRIME. DR HOVIND FURTHER STATED THAT HE
DID NOT ASSAULT MS OWEN AT THIS LOCATION AND THAT CHRISTOPHER KENUI DID IN
FACT HAVE TO PHYSICALLY REMOVE HIM AFTER HIS REFUSAL TO LEAVE VERBALLY.
AT THAT TIME, DR KENT HOVIND WAS PLACED UNDER ARREST, TRANSPORTED TO THE
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL AND CHARGED WITH BURGLARY, BATTERY AND ASSAULT. BOND
PLACED AT $1,000 AND RETURNABLE SET FOR 9-05-2002.
UPON MY DEPARTURE AT THIS LOCATION A SECONDARY WITNESS. PAUL JEWELL ARRIVED
AND STATED TO ME THAT HE WAS DRIVING DOWN THE ROAD DURING THE TIME OF THIS
INCIDENT AND MERELY SAW DR HOVIND STANDING ON THE FRONT PORCH AT 100
CUMMINGS ST. HE FURTHER STATED HE DID NOT OBSERVE ANY ALTERCATION.
WITNESS STATEMENT FORMS WERE DOCUMENTED BY THE VICTIMS AND WITNESSES IN THIS
INCIDENT TO BE TURNED IN WITH REPORT. BURK, DAVID KARL 312 ID
========================
JEWELL, PAUL DAVID W M 02/06/1975
Addresses (Current/Last Known is Listed First) XXXX N PALAFOX ST PENSACOLA
FL 32503 Phone: (850)473-XXXX
Occupations (Current/Last Known is Listed First) Business: CREATIONS SCIENCE
EVANL, Job Title:, Phone: 850 Entered: 08/15/2002
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-http://iidb.org/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=58&t=001360
(sfnettiin "jama" pistänyt tämän esiin 8.9.2002)
Vai että murtauduttu on. No mitä tämä nyt sitten todistaa mistään tämän palstan aiheista ?
Etkö ymmärrä: KRETINISTI JOUTUI KIINNI. Niin käy sinullekin.
Täällä on näkjään väärentäjät liikkeellä.
Tässä kirjoittaa aito Mr.K.A.T.
Signatureni:
Jättiluvun 7^27685366 viimeinen nro on 9 .
http://www.student.oulu.fi/~ktikkane/FI.html
.