18. v. liian vanha muslimeille "Ihanin nainen" -kilpailussa

Tervetuloa ISLAM ylivalta jolloin TODELLAKAAN et saa mm. olla kristitty, ateisti, angnostiikko, homo, sikalafarmari jne. Kaikki nämä ovat kiellettyjä ISLAM valtiossa ja näiden ryhmien jäsenet MURHATAAN ilman oikeudenkäyntiä. Näin käy kaikissa ISLAM valtioissa. Enemmän tai vähemmän. Jopa Ranskassa jo, vaikka se ei varsinaisesti ole vielä ISLAM valtio...

"Tolerance in this sense did not suggest an acceptance of that which was being tolerated, but connoted the idea of allowing something in spite of how one actually felt about it, as embodied in the quotation falsely attributed to Voltaire, “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”

During the revolution’s reign of terror, all tolerance came to a sudden end. Revolutionary thought police began enforcing what we now call ‘political correctness.’ The guillotine was used to vigorously suppress any opinion or expression which contravened the anti-Christian values of the revolution..."

"...the media consistently failed to report the true nature of what is occurring. In particular, they did not tell the public that these rioters were predominantly Muslims, many of whom had been crying “Alah Akbar” as they vandalized, destroyed property and burned down entire neighborhoods.

The mainline media also did not report that many of the Muslims leaders at the time of the riots were asking for governmental autonomy in their villages so that these Muslim communities – islands within French society – could follow legal systems based on Muslim law. The very fact that these rioters were Muslim was downplayed by the French government. In fact, “saying they’re Muslim is a subject of angry dispute” wrote David R. Sands and Sharon Behn in The Washington Times on November 10th, 2005. “French officials downplay the religious connections, and some newspapers, particularly in the United States, avoid identifying the rioters as Muslim.”

That event, a little over four years ago, encapsulates the French approach to its growing Islamic problem. The approach can be summed up in the two words: denial and appeasement.

So how did France’s Muslim problem first arise? Following WWII, the French workforce was inadequate for reconstruction efforts. To correct this problem, large numbers of Muslim men were invited into the country. Coming from French colonies in Algeria and other North African countries, these immigrants settled in France. In 1974, the government passed a law allowing the children and wives of immigrants to settle as well.

Since then the Muslim population has steadily grown, occupying high-rise ghettoes and forming cultural enclaves which have never assimilated into French culture.

At the same time, the non-Muslim population of France has been gradually decreasing. Alarmed by the fact that the average French family only has one child (not even close to replacement level) the government introduced a policy giving subsidies to families who have three or more children. The Muslims have been taking advantage of this policy, having six to eight children on average and living off the government."

http://atgsociety.com/2010/02/christianity-under-attack-in-france/