"Ja paskat", sanoo Paavo Lipponen kansanvallalle, ja piiskaa kuollutta EU-perustuslakia voimaan vielä ennen Suomen 1.7. alkavaa puheenjohtajakautta!
Vanhanen ajelehtii ajopuuna EU-virrassa.
Saman aikaisesti EU-perustuslain vastustus kansan keskuudessa on ennätysmäisen laajaa.
Tanskalaisen MEP:n terveiset komission neuvotteluista:
THE DEAD EU CONSTITUTION RISES TO HAUNT AGAIN
Briefing by Jens-Peter Bonde MEP
June Movement Denmark; Joint Chair,Independence and Democracy Group,
European Parliament
Friday 10 March 2006
The Finnish Parliament will ratify the "dead" EU Constitution before
Finland takes over the EU presidency on 1 July this year. This became
obvious this week in discussions between a delegation from the
European Parliament's Constitutional Committee which included me and
the Finnish Parliament.
The President of the Finnish Parliament, former Prime Minister Paavo
Lipponen, told us that he is in favour of an early ratification of the
EU Constitution. The Finnish Covernment have sent a White Book on the
Constitution to the Finish Parliament. They will now start
deliberations on the text.
The Finnish Prime Minister, Vanhanen, is not keen on being involved in
a conflict before his European presidency. He is not the person to
push the matter. However, he is not the person to block the process
either. In the Convention I worked with him for a referendum on the
Constitution. He must have forgotten that when he became Prime
Minister, thus illustrating the old proverb: "It's the job that
decides, not the person."
The majority in the Finnish Parliament and all parties except a small
minority of individuals want the EU Constitution now. We only heard
one single voice of opposition during our visit: Timo Soini of the
True Finns party. Everyone else was pleased with the Constitution,
which I doubt most of them have even read.
At the same time support for the European Union in Finland has reached
its lowest level ever in opinion polls. The appeasement policy of the
Finnish elite towards Brussels was striking. I understand Finnish
security interests in EU membership, but why sign a Constitution that
will reduce Finnish democracy in the very year when they celebrate 100
years of Finnish democracy?
The ratification and the celebration may indeed coincide on the same
days in June. What a paradox! The Finnish Constitution gives all the
power to the Finnish voters. In the proposed EU Constitution you can
only indirectly find the normal democratic principles.
Those people we vote for at national level cannot make proposals in
the EU. All EU proposals are made by people that we cannot elect or
select.
In Finland and all other democracies the elected members of parliament
decide the laws. You can have a new majority at the next elections and
then change the law by means of new legislation. This fundamental
democratic principle does not exist in the European cooperation or in
the proposed EU Constitution.
In the EU 85% of all laws are effectively decided by civil servants
behind closed doors, and the remaining 15% by ministers and civil
servants together. As a derogation from that, members of the European
Parliament can influence EU law-making by proposing amendments to EU
laws coming from the EU Council and Commission when they are supported
by an absolute majority of the Parliament's members, which require
agreement between left and right.
In the Finnish Parliament all laws can be changed, amended and decided
by a simple majority in the parliament. Finnish voters always have the
last word.
We now need to re-start the debate on the content of the proposed EU
Constitution before it will be ratified in more countries. Since the
French and Dutch voters killed the Constitution, it has been ratified
in Luxembourg, Malta, Cyprus, Latvia and Belgium. Estonia and Finland
are on their way.
After the French presidential elections in May next year the German
Chancellor and the new French President may try to have a re-run in
France of the very misleading and short Parts I and II of the
Constitution and then have the detailed Parts III and IV ratified by
the French National Asssmbly
In the European Parliament my "Group for Independence and Democracy"
is buying a bus to travel throughout Europe to meet the voters and
debate the proposed EU Constitution and our alternatives with them. I
hope that we shall have this bus ready for the European summit in
Brussels on March 23th
Here is our different material on the Constitution (see link below)
http://www.euabc.com/
Jens-Peter Bonde MEP
Vanhanen ajelehtii ajopuuna EU-virrassa.
Saman aikaisesti EU-perustuslain vastustus kansan keskuudessa on ennätysmäisen laajaa.
Tanskalaisen MEP:n terveiset komission neuvotteluista:
THE DEAD EU CONSTITUTION RISES TO HAUNT AGAIN
Briefing by Jens-Peter Bonde MEP
June Movement Denmark; Joint Chair,Independence and Democracy Group,
European Parliament
Friday 10 March 2006
The Finnish Parliament will ratify the "dead" EU Constitution before
Finland takes over the EU presidency on 1 July this year. This became
obvious this week in discussions between a delegation from the
European Parliament's Constitutional Committee which included me and
the Finnish Parliament.
The President of the Finnish Parliament, former Prime Minister Paavo
Lipponen, told us that he is in favour of an early ratification of the
EU Constitution. The Finnish Covernment have sent a White Book on the
Constitution to the Finish Parliament. They will now start
deliberations on the text.
The Finnish Prime Minister, Vanhanen, is not keen on being involved in
a conflict before his European presidency. He is not the person to
push the matter. However, he is not the person to block the process
either. In the Convention I worked with him for a referendum on the
Constitution. He must have forgotten that when he became Prime
Minister, thus illustrating the old proverb: "It's the job that
decides, not the person."
The majority in the Finnish Parliament and all parties except a small
minority of individuals want the EU Constitution now. We only heard
one single voice of opposition during our visit: Timo Soini of the
True Finns party. Everyone else was pleased with the Constitution,
which I doubt most of them have even read.
At the same time support for the European Union in Finland has reached
its lowest level ever in opinion polls. The appeasement policy of the
Finnish elite towards Brussels was striking. I understand Finnish
security interests in EU membership, but why sign a Constitution that
will reduce Finnish democracy in the very year when they celebrate 100
years of Finnish democracy?
The ratification and the celebration may indeed coincide on the same
days in June. What a paradox! The Finnish Constitution gives all the
power to the Finnish voters. In the proposed EU Constitution you can
only indirectly find the normal democratic principles.
Those people we vote for at national level cannot make proposals in
the EU. All EU proposals are made by people that we cannot elect or
select.
In Finland and all other democracies the elected members of parliament
decide the laws. You can have a new majority at the next elections and
then change the law by means of new legislation. This fundamental
democratic principle does not exist in the European cooperation or in
the proposed EU Constitution.
In the EU 85% of all laws are effectively decided by civil servants
behind closed doors, and the remaining 15% by ministers and civil
servants together. As a derogation from that, members of the European
Parliament can influence EU law-making by proposing amendments to EU
laws coming from the EU Council and Commission when they are supported
by an absolute majority of the Parliament's members, which require
agreement between left and right.
In the Finnish Parliament all laws can be changed, amended and decided
by a simple majority in the parliament. Finnish voters always have the
last word.
We now need to re-start the debate on the content of the proposed EU
Constitution before it will be ratified in more countries. Since the
French and Dutch voters killed the Constitution, it has been ratified
in Luxembourg, Malta, Cyprus, Latvia and Belgium. Estonia and Finland
are on their way.
After the French presidential elections in May next year the German
Chancellor and the new French President may try to have a re-run in
France of the very misleading and short Parts I and II of the
Constitution and then have the detailed Parts III and IV ratified by
the French National Asssmbly
In the European Parliament my "Group for Independence and Democracy"
is buying a bus to travel throughout Europe to meet the voters and
debate the proposed EU Constitution and our alternatives with them. I
hope that we shall have this bus ready for the European summit in
Brussels on March 23th
Here is our different material on the Constitution (see link below)
http://www.euabc.com/
Jens-Peter Bonde MEP
Vastaukset 5
Vanhimmat
ja suomentanut nuo terveiset! Helppoa se on siirtää tekstiä yhtä nappia painamalla, mutta olisit samalla edes yrittänyt tehdä selväksi mitä tuossa sanotaan. Taisi loppua "insinöörin" sanavarasto maailmankielen osalta.
Tuo lainattu pätevyys ei oikein pure, enempää kuin saarijärven fiaskokaan.
... tulikin sanottua. Hieman laajempi referaatti löytyy tuosta alempaa.
> ""Ja paskat", sanoo Paavo Lipponen kansanvallalle, ja piiskaa kuollutta EU-perustuslakia voimaan vielä ennen Suomen 1.7. alkavaa puheenjohtajakautta!
Vanhanen ajelehtii ajopuuna EU-virrassa.
Saman aikaisesti EU-perustuslain vastustus kansan keskuudessa on ennätysmäisen laajaa."
Kyllä kielten opiskelusta on hyötyä, ei tarvitse pyytää ihan kaikkea suomentamaan.
Suosittelen.
>kyllä kielten opiskelusta on hyötyä suosittelen.< Tunnusta että et pysty suomentamaan tuota. odotamme pari päivää, ehkä joku kirjastotäti tai vastaava auttaa sinuakin.
tai jospa nuo espoossa olevat omat "kollitkin" osaisi tuon verran vai onko linjat kiinni.
Enemmistö Euroopan Parlamentin suomalaisedustajista katsoo, ettei Suomen kannata ratifioida EU:n Perustuslakia. Suomen 14 europarlamentaarikosta ratifiointia kannattavat vain Riitta Myller (sdp), Reino Paasilinna (sdp) ja Lasse Lehtinen (sdp) sekä Alexander Stubb (kok). Satu Hassi (vihr) ei ota kantaa. Muista edustajista Suomen ei pidä vahvistaa sopimusta, joka ei tule sellaisenaan voimaan. Sopimus kaatui 2005 Ranskan ja Hollannin kansanäänestyksissä. Esimerkiksi komissaari Olli Rehnin (kepu) ja eduskunnan puhemiehen Paavo Lipposen (sdp) mielestä ratifiointi vahvistaisi Suomen asemaa näin EU-puheenjohtajavuonna.
PerusS:n Presidenttiehdokas Timo Soini piti tammikuussa 2006 hölmönä EU:n Perustuslain ratifioimista Suomen Eduskunnassa. – Pilkkuakaan ei saa muuttaa ja kun kaksi maata on sen jo hylännyt, niin ilman muutoksia se ei voi tulla voimaan. Täysin turhaa työtä teetetään eduskunnalla.
Nyt kova pauhaus päälle tästä asiasta!!! Jyrkkä EI.