USA vetäytyy syksyllä pikku hiljaa
http://www.yle.fi/uutiset/oikea/id37277.html
- luotuaan meidän länsimaillemme tuhansia potentiaalisia terroristiehdokkaita, joita Irakissa ei ollu ennen 2003, jolloin USA meni sinne rosvoamaan...
"Kiitos" USA:n ja Iso-Britanialle, Puolalle jne.. jotka ovat meille muille länsimaille ovat laittomilla sodillaan luoneet nyt todellisia terroristiehdokkaita, sillä kansalaisterrorismi syntyy usein sorrosta ja väärinteosta.
Varastettuaan jo tarpeeksi öljyä ja nostettuaan sen johtajiensa omistamien osakkeiden osakekursseja, USA vetäytynee 2008 lopullisesti?
Tuskin...sillä 12 sotilastukikohdasta on tämä miehittäjävaltio joka muissa lähimaissa jo miehittäjänä tunnetaankin...
Bush ja valikoiva muisti:
http://www.ameratsu.com/media/vid/msnbc/msnbc_hb_downing_memo_redux_060327a_240x180.wmv
Prompted by a new report in The New York Times, MSNBC's Hardball takes a fresh look at a history of the Iraq war through the lens of a January 31, 2003 memo detailing a White House meeting between Bush and Blair.
This video begins with a report by David Shuster that weighs possible repercussions of the The Memo against the increasing violence in Iraq and President Bush's low standing in the polls.
Chris Matthews interviews writer Phillippe Sands whose recent book, "Lawless World", exposes more pre-war lies. According to The Times, Mr. Sands "is a professor of international law at University College of London and the founding member of the Matrix law office in London, where the prime minister's wife, Cherie Blair, is a partner."
Matthews and Sands take the opportunity to pile on The President. Even Matthews' questions to Sands appear to be clear indictments of The Presidents actions:
MATTHEWS: What struck me in the memorandum again today was that the President George W. Bush had decided to go to war with Iraq before completing the inspections. Had decided to do so before sending Secretary of State--and a skeptic, I must say--Colin Powell to the United Nations.
What is the significance of that? That he made the decision--as recorded by David Manning who was working for the Prime Minister at the time--before either of those events occurred . The U.N. presentation which was apparently to sell Europe of the fact that there were weapons of mass destruction and the completion of the weapons inspections themselves. Both were not waited for. The President decided before then. So did Tony Blair apparently.
The January 31, 2003 memo is consistent with the July 2002 "Downing Street" Memos where British officials expressed concern that Bush had already decided to go to invade Iraq and that "intelligence was being fixed around the policy" to meet that goal.
[Kopiovapapaata materiaalia]
http://www.yle.fi/uutiset/oikea/id37277.html
- luotuaan meidän länsimaillemme tuhansia potentiaalisia terroristiehdokkaita, joita Irakissa ei ollu ennen 2003, jolloin USA meni sinne rosvoamaan...
"Kiitos" USA:n ja Iso-Britanialle, Puolalle jne.. jotka ovat meille muille länsimaille ovat laittomilla sodillaan luoneet nyt todellisia terroristiehdokkaita, sillä kansalaisterrorismi syntyy usein sorrosta ja väärinteosta.
Varastettuaan jo tarpeeksi öljyä ja nostettuaan sen johtajiensa omistamien osakkeiden osakekursseja, USA vetäytynee 2008 lopullisesti?
Tuskin...sillä 12 sotilastukikohdasta on tämä miehittäjävaltio joka muissa lähimaissa jo miehittäjänä tunnetaankin...
Bush ja valikoiva muisti:
http://www.ameratsu.com/media/vid/msnbc/msnbc_hb_downing_memo_redux_060327a_240x180.wmv
Prompted by a new report in The New York Times, MSNBC's Hardball takes a fresh look at a history of the Iraq war through the lens of a January 31, 2003 memo detailing a White House meeting between Bush and Blair.
This video begins with a report by David Shuster that weighs possible repercussions of the The Memo against the increasing violence in Iraq and President Bush's low standing in the polls.
Chris Matthews interviews writer Phillippe Sands whose recent book, "Lawless World", exposes more pre-war lies. According to The Times, Mr. Sands "is a professor of international law at University College of London and the founding member of the Matrix law office in London, where the prime minister's wife, Cherie Blair, is a partner."
Matthews and Sands take the opportunity to pile on The President. Even Matthews' questions to Sands appear to be clear indictments of The Presidents actions:
MATTHEWS: What struck me in the memorandum again today was that the President George W. Bush had decided to go to war with Iraq before completing the inspections. Had decided to do so before sending Secretary of State--and a skeptic, I must say--Colin Powell to the United Nations.
What is the significance of that? That he made the decision--as recorded by David Manning who was working for the Prime Minister at the time--before either of those events occurred . The U.N. presentation which was apparently to sell Europe of the fact that there were weapons of mass destruction and the completion of the weapons inspections themselves. Both were not waited for. The President decided before then. So did Tony Blair apparently.
The January 31, 2003 memo is consistent with the July 2002 "Downing Street" Memos where British officials expressed concern that Bush had already decided to go to invade Iraq and that "intelligence was being fixed around the policy" to meet that goal.
[Kopiovapapaata materiaalia]
Vastaukset
Vanhimmat
Ei vielä vastauksia
Aloittaja odottaa vastauksia. Kerro oma näkemyksesi ensimmäisenä.