Käsittämättömän epäpätevä 9/11-komissio on alkanut pestä käsiään raportistaan jonka piti esittää syyskuun 2001 terrori-iskujen koko kuva, huomattuaan amerikan heränneen totuuteen (36% uskoo USAn olleen jossain määrin osallinen iskuihin http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/one_in_3_americans_say_u_s__aided_9_11_nationalnews_thomas_hargrove______and_guido_h__stempel_iii.htm)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14191255/
...The Sept. 11 commission was so frustrated with repeated misstatements by the Pentagon and FAA about their response to the 2001 terror attacks that it considered an investigation into possible deception, the panel’s chairmen say in a new book...
...The questioning of Giuliani was considered by Kean and Hamilton “a low point” in the commission’s examination of witnesses during public hearings. “We did not ask tough questions, nor did we get all of the information we needed to put on the public record,”...
9/11-leskien ryhmä asettaa sanansa mainiosti:
http://www.911citizenswatch.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=913&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
...The fact that the Commission did not see fit to tie up all loose ends in their final report or to hold those who came before them accountable for lying and/or making misleading statements puts into question the veracity of the entire Commission’s report. Individuals who came before the Commission to testify, after NORAD’s appearance, had no reason to state the truth. It was abundantly clear that there would be no repercussions for any misrepresentations...
...The 9/11 Commission was derelict in its duties. What we needed from them was a thorough investigation into the events of September 11th. Inexcusably, five years later, we still do.
Toivottavasti seuraava komissio on edes sellainen, ettei se ole ihan kenen hyvänsä lahjottavissa..
http://www.infowars.com/articles/911/pakistan_weekly_spills_911_bea.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14191255/
...The Sept. 11 commission was so frustrated with repeated misstatements by the Pentagon and FAA about their response to the 2001 terror attacks that it considered an investigation into possible deception, the panel’s chairmen say in a new book...
...The questioning of Giuliani was considered by Kean and Hamilton “a low point” in the commission’s examination of witnesses during public hearings. “We did not ask tough questions, nor did we get all of the information we needed to put on the public record,”...
9/11-leskien ryhmä asettaa sanansa mainiosti:
http://www.911citizenswatch.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=913&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
...The fact that the Commission did not see fit to tie up all loose ends in their final report or to hold those who came before them accountable for lying and/or making misleading statements puts into question the veracity of the entire Commission’s report. Individuals who came before the Commission to testify, after NORAD’s appearance, had no reason to state the truth. It was abundantly clear that there would be no repercussions for any misrepresentations...
...The 9/11 Commission was derelict in its duties. What we needed from them was a thorough investigation into the events of September 11th. Inexcusably, five years later, we still do.
Toivottavasti seuraava komissio on edes sellainen, ettei se ole ihan kenen hyvänsä lahjottavissa..
http://www.infowars.com/articles/911/pakistan_weekly_spills_911_bea.html
Vastaukset 1
Vanhimmat
11.9.2001 oli USA:n murhahanke