Mikä elokuva kyseessä?

Olen kysynyt tätä täältä jo aikaisemmin mutta sillon se ei tuottanut tulosta eli kysyn nyt uudestaan mikä elokuva voisi olla kyseessä?

Elokuva on ainakin yli 10 vuotta vanha! Muistikuvat on hieman hatarat koska siitä on aikaa kun olen sen katsonut! Siinä tyttö raiskattiin muistaakseni heti alussa ja sitten palattiin ajassa taaksepäin ja näytettiin mistä kaikki sai alkunsa ja mitä kaikkea ennen raiskausta tapahtui...
Siinä joku mies seurasi ja ahdisteli tätä tyttöä. Yhdessä kohtaa se oli mm laittanut jonkun lapun tytön koululokeroon jossa luki "rape"
Sitten se seurasi tätä tyttöä ja hänen kaveriaan rannalle ja kyyläsi siellä pusikoissa heitä...
Juuri muuta en siitä muistakkaan!!
Tässä elokuvassa oli siis pääosassa tämä raiskattu nuori tyttö...koko elokuva kertoi siitä ajasta ennen raiskausta ja siitä kuinka tämä pakkomielteinen mies terrorisoi tytön elämää, uhkaili, pelotteli ja seurasi...
6580
Äänestä

Muut lukivat myös

Vastaukset 6

Vanhimmat

en itekkää muista kyseistä leffaa, mutta nähty on:(

Äänestä

Luojan tähden älä ole yksin.

Äänestä
  • se leffa jonka remake oli vasta elokuvissa? Jos kyseessä se niin ei taida olla sama leffa kyseessä...

    Äänestä

  • -Minä- kirjoitti:

    se leffa jonka remake oli vasta elokuvissa? Jos kyseessä se niin ei taida olla sama leffa kyseessä...

    mutta tässä leffassa on juoni ainakin just noin :






    Doe-eyed high school student Kathleen Beller is found beaten and

    raped in the opening scenes of this made for TV movie. The film

    then flashbacks to the few days before the rape, as Beller is

    harassed by a stranger.

    Beller and Scott Colomby and her best friend Robin Mattson and

    Dennis Quaid are double dating early on. Beller's anxious parents,

    laid back Tony Bill and shrill Blythe Danner, wait at home wringing

    hands and so on. Right away, the 1970's makes its dated

    entrance, as the young couples discuss the romance and love in

    "Three Days of the Condor."

    Beller, an amateur photographer, begins getting threatening notes

    stuffed in her locker at school. The film makers wisely give us a

    whole slew of suspects: Beller's new boyfriend, Mattson's

    boyfriend, Beller's dad, Beller's ex-boyfriend, and what about that

    overly friendly photography class teacher who wants Beller to be a

    little more sexy in her self-portraits? I knew who the rapist was

    because the Worldvision Video company video box has a picture of

    the attack on the back cover, destroying any suspense in that

    regard.

    Without giving away who the attacker is, Beller begins getting

    harassing phone calls, and is eventually raped. The movie then

    heads south as she makes like Nancy Drew and secretly sets up

    a time lapse camera to catch the guy stalking another student.

    Finally, the film makers tack on a hokey ending narration from

    Beller about the lack of understanding for the victims of rape in that

    day and age.

    The suspense here is very real, without going over the top into

    scary movie stuff. Beller is very good, and watch for her and

    Mattson's scene in an abandoned theater- both do great jobs. The

    film is full of familiar faces, including Ellen Travolta in a small role,

    and everyone is professional.

    This was made in 1978, and it shows. I am sure no one had any

    idea that this would be reviewed in 2001 by an overcritical horror

    movie lover who needs to get to bed and be up early in the

    morning, but some of the attitudes here are embarassing. The

    teacher who tells Beller to be sexy is never made to explain what

    exactly he had in mind. Nowadays, if any high school teacher said

    that, then THAT would have been a made for TV movie on its own.

    After Beller is raped, the rapist is still a part of her life, as warrants

    are issued, blah, blah, blah. There may not be a case because

    Beller is not a virgin, and cannot prove she was raped by whom

    she said. Many of these problems have been addressed with

    modern technology and policing efforts, but this film obviously

    knew it would have a chance to add to the reform debate. Rape is

    an act of violence that has not gone away, but efforts today to catch

    the attackers are miles ahead of twenty four years ago. The

    problem is the anti-rape angle feels tacked on, like an

    afterthought. Before that, we have a tight little suspenser that has

    real honest to God characterization. After the rape, everything

    changes, filmwise, and not for the better.

    I remember Beller from the '70's and '80's (and who could forget

    her revealing role in "The Betsy"), but she has not done anything in

    almost ten years. This is a shame, since she was very good way

    back then.

    I will recommend "Are You in the House Alone?!" based on the

    acting alone, with a reluctant nod to at least the first two-thirds of

    the film. If you want to relive 1970's made for TV high school life,

    this is your cup of Tab.

    This is unrated but contains physical violence, some sexual

    violence, and some adult situations.

    Äänestä

  • sargas kirjoitti:

    mutta tässä leffassa on juoni ainakin just noin :






    Doe-eyed high school student Kathleen Beller is found beaten and

    raped in the opening scenes of this made for TV movie. The film

    then flashbacks to the few days before the rape, as Beller is

    harassed by a stranger.

    Beller and Scott Colomby and her best friend Robin Mattson and

    Dennis Quaid are double dating early on. Beller's anxious parents,

    laid back Tony Bill and shrill Blythe Danner, wait at home wringing

    hands and so on. Right away, the 1970's makes its dated

    entrance, as the young couples discuss the romance and love in

    "Three Days of the Condor."

    Beller, an amateur photographer, begins getting threatening notes

    stuffed in her locker at school. The film makers wisely give us a

    whole slew of suspects: Beller's new boyfriend, Mattson's

    boyfriend, Beller's dad, Beller's ex-boyfriend, and what about that

    overly friendly photography class teacher who wants Beller to be a

    little more sexy in her self-portraits? I knew who the rapist was

    because the Worldvision Video company video box has a picture of

    the attack on the back cover, destroying any suspense in that

    regard.

    Without giving away who the attacker is, Beller begins getting

    harassing phone calls, and is eventually raped. The movie then

    heads south as she makes like Nancy Drew and secretly sets up

    a time lapse camera to catch the guy stalking another student.

    Finally, the film makers tack on a hokey ending narration from

    Beller about the lack of understanding for the victims of rape in that

    day and age.

    The suspense here is very real, without going over the top into

    scary movie stuff. Beller is very good, and watch for her and

    Mattson's scene in an abandoned theater- both do great jobs. The

    film is full of familiar faces, including Ellen Travolta in a small role,

    and everyone is professional.

    This was made in 1978, and it shows. I am sure no one had any

    idea that this would be reviewed in 2001 by an overcritical horror

    movie lover who needs to get to bed and be up early in the

    morning, but some of the attitudes here are embarassing. The

    teacher who tells Beller to be sexy is never made to explain what

    exactly he had in mind. Nowadays, if any high school teacher said

    that, then THAT would have been a made for TV movie on its own.

    After Beller is raped, the rapist is still a part of her life, as warrants

    are issued, blah, blah, blah. There may not be a case because

    Beller is not a virgin, and cannot prove she was raped by whom

    she said. Many of these problems have been addressed with

    modern technology and policing efforts, but this film obviously

    knew it would have a chance to add to the reform debate. Rape is

    an act of violence that has not gone away, but efforts today to catch

    the attackers are miles ahead of twenty four years ago. The

    problem is the anti-rape angle feels tacked on, like an

    afterthought. Before that, we have a tight little suspenser that has

    real honest to God characterization. After the rape, everything

    changes, filmwise, and not for the better.

    I remember Beller from the '70's and '80's (and who could forget

    her revealing role in "The Betsy"), but she has not done anything in

    almost ten years. This is a shame, since she was very good way

    back then.

    I will recommend "Are You in the House Alone?!" based on the

    acting alone, with a reluctant nod to at least the first two-thirds of

    the film. If you want to relive 1970's made for TV high school life,

    this is your cup of Tab.

    This is unrated but contains physical violence, some sexual

    violence, and some adult situations.

    Tämä taitaa olla just se mitä haeskelin :)

    Äänestä

  • sargas kirjoitti:

    mutta tässä leffassa on juoni ainakin just noin :






    Doe-eyed high school student Kathleen Beller is found beaten and

    raped in the opening scenes of this made for TV movie. The film

    then flashbacks to the few days before the rape, as Beller is

    harassed by a stranger.

    Beller and Scott Colomby and her best friend Robin Mattson and

    Dennis Quaid are double dating early on. Beller's anxious parents,

    laid back Tony Bill and shrill Blythe Danner, wait at home wringing

    hands and so on. Right away, the 1970's makes its dated

    entrance, as the young couples discuss the romance and love in

    "Three Days of the Condor."

    Beller, an amateur photographer, begins getting threatening notes

    stuffed in her locker at school. The film makers wisely give us a

    whole slew of suspects: Beller's new boyfriend, Mattson's

    boyfriend, Beller's dad, Beller's ex-boyfriend, and what about that

    overly friendly photography class teacher who wants Beller to be a

    little more sexy in her self-portraits? I knew who the rapist was

    because the Worldvision Video company video box has a picture of

    the attack on the back cover, destroying any suspense in that

    regard.

    Without giving away who the attacker is, Beller begins getting

    harassing phone calls, and is eventually raped. The movie then

    heads south as she makes like Nancy Drew and secretly sets up

    a time lapse camera to catch the guy stalking another student.

    Finally, the film makers tack on a hokey ending narration from

    Beller about the lack of understanding for the victims of rape in that

    day and age.

    The suspense here is very real, without going over the top into

    scary movie stuff. Beller is very good, and watch for her and

    Mattson's scene in an abandoned theater- both do great jobs. The

    film is full of familiar faces, including Ellen Travolta in a small role,

    and everyone is professional.

    This was made in 1978, and it shows. I am sure no one had any

    idea that this would be reviewed in 2001 by an overcritical horror

    movie lover who needs to get to bed and be up early in the

    morning, but some of the attitudes here are embarassing. The

    teacher who tells Beller to be sexy is never made to explain what

    exactly he had in mind. Nowadays, if any high school teacher said

    that, then THAT would have been a made for TV movie on its own.

    After Beller is raped, the rapist is still a part of her life, as warrants

    are issued, blah, blah, blah. There may not be a case because

    Beller is not a virgin, and cannot prove she was raped by whom

    she said. Many of these problems have been addressed with

    modern technology and policing efforts, but this film obviously

    knew it would have a chance to add to the reform debate. Rape is

    an act of violence that has not gone away, but efforts today to catch

    the attackers are miles ahead of twenty four years ago. The

    problem is the anti-rape angle feels tacked on, like an

    afterthought. Before that, we have a tight little suspenser that has

    real honest to God characterization. After the rape, everything

    changes, filmwise, and not for the better.

    I remember Beller from the '70's and '80's (and who could forget

    her revealing role in "The Betsy"), but she has not done anything in

    almost ten years. This is a shame, since she was very good way

    back then.

    I will recommend "Are You in the House Alone?!" based on the

    acting alone, with a reluctant nod to at least the first two-thirds of

    the film. If you want to relive 1970's made for TV high school life,

    this is your cup of Tab.

    This is unrated but contains physical violence, some sexual

    violence, and some adult situations.

    mikä tän leffan nimi on??

    Äänestä

Kommentoi aloitusta


-Minä- kirjoitti:

Olen kysynyt tätä täältä jo aikaisemmin mutta sillon se ei tuottanut tulosta eli kysyn nyt uudestaan mikä elokuva voisi olla kyseessä?

Elokuva on ainakin yli 10 vuotta vanha! Muistikuvat on hieman hatarat koska siitä on aikaa kun olen sen katsonut! Siinä tyttö raiskattiin muistaakseni heti alussa ja sitten palattiin ajassa taaksepäin ja näytettiin mistä kaikki sai alkunsa ja mitä kaikkea ennen raiskausta tapahtui...
Siinä joku mies seurasi ja ahdisteli tätä tyttöä. Yhdessä kohtaa se oli mm laittanut jonkun lapun tytön koululokeroon jossa luki "rape"
Sitten se seurasi tätä tyttöä ja hänen kaveriaan rannalle ja kyyläsi siellä pusikoissa heitä...
Juuri muuta en siitä muistakkaan!!
Tässä elokuvassa oli siis pääosassa tämä raiskattu nuori tyttö...koko elokuva kertoi siitä ajasta ennen raiskausta ja siitä kuinka tämä pakkomielteinen mies terrorisoi tytön elämää, uhkaili, pelotteli ja seurasi...

Anonyymi
5000

Ilmoita asiaton sisältö

  • Sisältää materiaalia, joka on loukkaavaa, herjaavaa, rasistista, uhkailevaa tai ahdistelevaa.

  • Materiaali sisältää nimiä, yhteystietoja tai muita henkilökohtaisia tietoja. Julkisuuden henkilöistä, julkisissa viroissa toimivista ihmisistä sekä yritysten vastuuhenkilöistä saa keskustella työhön liittyen. Myös yksityiselämään liittyvistä asioista voi keskustella siltä osin, kuin niistä on julkisesti kerrottu.

  • Sisältää lapsille haitallista tai heiltä kiellettyä materiaalia. Seksuaalinen sisältö on sallittua aiheeseen tarkoitetuilla palstoilla, joiden ikäraja on 18 vuotta.

  • Lainvastaista sisältöä voi olla mm. yksityiselämää loukkaavan tiedon levitys, kiihottaminen kansanryhmää vastaan, laiton uhkaaminen, alaikäisiin liittyvä seksuaalinen sisältö/grooming, petokset, identiteettivarkaudet, kunnianloukkaukset ja tekijänoikeusrikkomukset.

  • Sisältö ei liity palstan tai keskusteluketjun aiheeseen.

  • Viesti ei ole suomea tai ruotsia (pl. International Forums), se sisältää mainontaa, se sisältää tekijänoikeuksin suojattua materiaalia, se on massapostitus tai jokin muu syy.

Jaa keskustelu