Israelissa yhä suurempi määrä ihmisiä alkaa vaatia Oslon sopimuksen arkkitehteja oikeuden
eteen. Syytöksiä on monia: suostuminen neuvottelemaan terroristiorganisaation kanssa (se
on edelleen rikos, josta Israelin lain mukaan saa 15 vuotta vankeutta) aseiden antaminen
palestiinalaisille (73 kansanedustajaa vastusti sitä, mutta Rabin pani silti sen toimeen), jne.
Kun nyt on käynyt selväksi, ettei Arafatilla eikä palestiinalaisilla ole koskaan ollut aikomustakaan
elää rauhassa rinnakkain Israelin ja juutalaisten, vaan että Israelin Arafatin hallinnolle antamia
aseita on käytetty ja käytetään Israelia vastaan, niin vaatimusa saattaa Peres ja Beilin vastuuseen
rikoksistaan kasvaa ja voimistuu päivä päivältä - kohta Jigal Amiria, Rabinin ampujaa, epäilemättä juhlitaan sankarina. Beilinin ja Peresin ylimielisyys heihin kohdistuvan kritiikin edesä ei ainakaan heidän asemaansa paranna.
lainaus:
Seething with anger at the Oslo architects http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasen/pages/ShA rt.jhtml?
Fifteen months after what some believe is the collapse of the Oslo process, "Indict the Oslo criminals" is a code phrase for a wide range of demands.
According to Aryeh Stav, head of the Ariel Institute for Strategic Studies, and editor of Nativ, an academic journal, "in a properly run state, these people would be put on trial," but "since Israel is not properly run," there won't be a trial. "The rules of the game developed in Israel are pathological," he says. "All the prime ministers broke the law regarding the Golan. According to the law against treason, they should have been thrown into jail for life or executed. A gang like Peace Now would be considered traitors in a properly run country, but there's no point in putting them on trial because they do express the views of the majority."
Oslo, adds Stav, "was inherently illegal. It's the closest thing to a junta. The law defines the PLO as a terror organization and says anyone who engages in negotiations with it should get 15 years in jail. That law is still on the books, but everyone is silent."
Stav's use of the term "treason" is relatively unique, but there is a debate in the right about the term criminal." Haetzni says "those who made Oslo are criminals, in the public sense of the term, even if not in the technical sense."
eteen. Syytöksiä on monia: suostuminen neuvottelemaan terroristiorganisaation kanssa (se
on edelleen rikos, josta Israelin lain mukaan saa 15 vuotta vankeutta) aseiden antaminen
palestiinalaisille (73 kansanedustajaa vastusti sitä, mutta Rabin pani silti sen toimeen), jne.
Kun nyt on käynyt selväksi, ettei Arafatilla eikä palestiinalaisilla ole koskaan ollut aikomustakaan
elää rauhassa rinnakkain Israelin ja juutalaisten, vaan että Israelin Arafatin hallinnolle antamia
aseita on käytetty ja käytetään Israelia vastaan, niin vaatimusa saattaa Peres ja Beilin vastuuseen
rikoksistaan kasvaa ja voimistuu päivä päivältä - kohta Jigal Amiria, Rabinin ampujaa, epäilemättä juhlitaan sankarina. Beilinin ja Peresin ylimielisyys heihin kohdistuvan kritiikin edesä ei ainakaan heidän asemaansa paranna.
lainaus:
Seething with anger at the Oslo architects http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasen/pages/ShA rt.jhtml?
Fifteen months after what some believe is the collapse of the Oslo process, "Indict the Oslo criminals" is a code phrase for a wide range of demands.
According to Aryeh Stav, head of the Ariel Institute for Strategic Studies, and editor of Nativ, an academic journal, "in a properly run state, these people would be put on trial," but "since Israel is not properly run," there won't be a trial. "The rules of the game developed in Israel are pathological," he says. "All the prime ministers broke the law regarding the Golan. According to the law against treason, they should have been thrown into jail for life or executed. A gang like Peace Now would be considered traitors in a properly run country, but there's no point in putting them on trial because they do express the views of the majority."
Oslo, adds Stav, "was inherently illegal. It's the closest thing to a junta. The law defines the PLO as a terror organization and says anyone who engages in negotiations with it should get 15 years in jail. That law is still on the books, but everyone is silent."
Stav's use of the term "treason" is relatively unique, but there is a debate in the right about the term criminal." Haetzni says "those who made Oslo are criminals, in the public sense of the term, even if not in the technical sense."
Vastaukset
Vanhimmat
Ei vielä vastauksia
Aloittaja odottaa vastauksia. Kerro oma näkemyksesi ensimmäisenä.