Sunnuntaiksi tässä kateltavaa jos ette muuta keksi
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9210704017463126290
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9210704017463126290
Steven E Jones
Lecture UC Berkeley Campus
4237
0Äänestä
Muut lukivat myös
Odottaa vastausta
Näihin keskusteluihin ei ole vielä vastattu. Ole ensimmäinen.
Vastaukset 4
Vanhimmat
Vetää pienet skepzikot hiljaiseksi!
on niin lutunen!
pehmonallen tapanen on.
Vaan täyttä asiaa mies tuntuu puhuvan ja vilpittömästi. Taitaa budjetti vaan kutistua...onko yllätys.
Sota irakissa on kuulemma ohi ja Steven esittelee päivänselviä kysymyksiä joita olisi viranomaisten pitänyt esittää ja tutkia jo kauan sitten.
Prof. Steven Jonesin räjäytyshypoteesi on päässyt tieteelliseen tarkastukseen (Peer Review). Tarkastajina Totuusliikkeen (Scholars for 911) muut johtojäsenet Morgan Reynolds ja Judy Wood Prof. Fetzerin avustuksella.
[ Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Disintegrate? ]
A peer-review of Steven E. Jones' 9/11 Research
by Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood
*) http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/why_indeed.html
Ei kovin hyvältä näytä Jonesin teoriat edes Totuusliikkeen silmissä kun tuolla tavoin debunkkaavat ne.
"Jones calls it "superthermite" and jumps to the conclusion that it caused the molten metal pools burning 99 days without eliminating competing hypotheses. There is no proof that thermite could cause such long-lived, intense fires. Jones and others might conduct experiments to prove otherwise, but we doubt such a result can happen."
"Another issue is how the perpetrators could deploy and control the necessary thermite. With 236 perimeter columns and 47 core columns and 110 floors to cut loose in each tower, it might take 31,000 large thermite deposits/canisters igniting in a computerized sequence to bring each tower down. Even if thermite was placed on alternate floors, that would be 15,500 charges in each tower. Then there is the problem of sufficient radio frequencies with 220 floors, each with its own set of frequencies. Professor Jones might give these scenarios some thought."
"The majority of what Jones says is political and his physics is egregiously wrong"
"Perhaps Professor Jones’ most disturbing offense is failure to verify his data and show reproducibility in his experiments.The origin of his evidence is shadowy, chain of custody unknown, and materials and proof for the testing processes undocumented. Just like the 9/11 Commission’s methods, much of Jones’ so-called evidence is "self referential," that is, it is a closed loop of alleged results inaccessible and therefore unverifiable by outsiders. It is the "trust me" approach. Jones champions peer review yet he has never presented his 9/11 paper at a scientific conference despite at least one invitation, and his journal is not peer reviewed by scholars in the same discipline."