Jumalaa tieteellisesti testattu

http://telicthoughts.com/a-scientific-demonstration-of-the-non-existence-of-god/

A Scientific Demonstration of the Non-existence of God

More and more leaders in the scientific community have uncovered the non-existence of god. This scientific conclusion has been reviewed by evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins[1], neuroscientist Sam Harris[2], physicist Victor Stenger[3], and developmental biologist PZ Myers[4]. However, a literature search uncomfortably shows that none of these scientists have ever conducted a single experiment to detect the existence of god. Given that it is essential the scientific community rid the world of irrational, deleterious god-belief, I have sought to rectify this situation and provide these leading scientists with the data they clearly need.


Discussion

Religion is the root of all evil. As many leading scientists have shown, the best way to eliminate this plague is to use the power of the scientific method to demonstrate that god does not exist. This study represents the first experiment that directly tests for the existence of god. Previous studies have tested for the efficacy of prayer in a clinical setting[5], but these studies were flawed in not making it clear to the putative deities that their existence was being called into question.

The failure to turn water into wine (Figure 1) can only be explained by the non-existence of deities, as deities, by definition, should have been able to meet this scientific test. No further testing is required as Science has now falsified god.
1186
Äänestä

Muut lukivat myös

Vastaukset 1

Vanhimmat

"Religion is the root of all evil. As many leading scientists have shown, the best way to eliminate this plague is to use the power of the scientific method to demonstrate that god does not exist."

hahahhaa

Äänestä

Kommentoi aloitusta


tulokset luettavissa taalta kirjoitti:

http://telicthoughts.com/a-scientific-demonstration-of-the-non-existence-of-god/

A Scientific Demonstration of the Non-existence of God

More and more leaders in the scientific community have uncovered the non-existence of god. This scientific conclusion has been reviewed by evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins[1], neuroscientist Sam Harris[2], physicist Victor Stenger[3], and developmental biologist PZ Myers[4]. However, a literature search uncomfortably shows that none of these scientists have ever conducted a single experiment to detect the existence of god. Given that it is essential the scientific community rid the world of irrational, deleterious god-belief, I have sought to rectify this situation and provide these leading scientists with the data they clearly need.


Discussion

Religion is the root of all evil. As many leading scientists have shown, the best way to eliminate this plague is to use the power of the scientific method to demonstrate that god does not exist. This study represents the first experiment that directly tests for the existence of god. Previous studies have tested for the efficacy of prayer in a clinical setting[5], but these studies were flawed in not making it clear to the putative deities that their existence was being called into question.

The failure to turn water into wine (Figure 1) can only be explained by the non-existence of deities, as deities, by definition, should have been able to meet this scientific test. No further testing is required as Science has now falsified god.

Anonyymi
5000

Ilmoita asiaton sisältö

  • Sisältää materiaalia, joka on loukkaavaa, herjaavaa, rasistista, uhkailevaa tai ahdistelevaa.

  • Materiaali sisältää nimiä, yhteystietoja tai muita henkilökohtaisia tietoja. Julkisuuden henkilöistä, julkisissa viroissa toimivista ihmisistä sekä yritysten vastuuhenkilöistä saa keskustella työhön liittyen. Myös yksityiselämään liittyvistä asioista voi keskustella siltä osin, kuin niistä on julkisesti kerrottu.

  • Sisältää lapsille haitallista tai heiltä kiellettyä materiaalia. Seksuaalinen sisältö on sallittua aiheeseen tarkoitetuilla palstoilla, joiden ikäraja on 18 vuotta.

  • Lainvastaista sisältöä voi olla mm. yksityiselämää loukkaavan tiedon levitys, kiihottaminen kansanryhmää vastaan, laiton uhkaaminen, alaikäisiin liittyvä seksuaalinen sisältö/grooming, petokset, identiteettivarkaudet, kunnianloukkaukset ja tekijänoikeusrikkomukset.

  • Sisältö ei liity palstan tai keskusteluketjun aiheeseen.

  • Viesti ei ole suomea tai ruotsia (pl. International Forums), se sisältää mainontaa, se sisältää tekijänoikeuksin suojattua materiaalia, se on massapostitus tai jokin muu syy.

Jaa keskustelu