Mikä takuu että venäjä tarvittaessa suojelisi eurooppaa

"Yhdysvallat ja Venäjä on sotilaallisesti yhtä vahvoja"

Naurettava väite. Etsi luvut esiin netistä ja opi.

1) United States

2) China

3) United Kingdom

4) Russia

5) Israel

6) North Korea

7) South Korea

8) Saudi Arabia

9) Ukraine

10) India

Powerful militaries will consist of a large ground force but an Air Force, and Navy would be required for a military to be truly powerful.

armeijat kirjoitti:

1) United States

2) China

3) United Kingdom

4) Russia

5) Israel

6) North Korea

7) South Korea

8) Saudi Arabia

9) Ukraine

10) India

Powerful militaries will consist of a large ground force but an Air Force, and Navy would be required for a military to be truly powerful.

jota ne on levittänyt kansalleen!

ja koko listahan on ihan päin vittua!

Esim. pakistan on isrelia vahvempi!
mutta silti kumpikaan ei kuulu top 10 listalle!

Miesmäärässä Kiina on ykkönen
ydinaseiden määrässä USA on ykkönen
Avaruusaseissa Venäjä on ykkönen samoin skalaari aseissa

Käytännössä USA on itse sanonut että se ei kykene käymään voitokasta sotaa IRANIA vastaa!
Missä listallasi on IRAN jos USAllakaan ei sinne ole menemistä!?
Israelin armeja häviäisi ruotsinkin armejalle!
varmaan suomenkin, mutta siinä on jo sitten suomalainen sisu mukana!

LISTASI ON PROPAGANTAA!

armeijat kirjoitti:

1) United States

2) China

3) United Kingdom

4) Russia

5) Israel

6) North Korea

7) South Korea

8) Saudi Arabia

9) Ukraine

10) India

Powerful militaries will consist of a large ground force but an Air Force, and Navy would be required for a military to be truly powerful.

Eli dollarilla! Kun samalla summalla saa kiinassa 10 lentotukialusta kun usassa yhden.
Tässä yksi lista mikä on lähempänä totuutta kuin tuo:
http://www.strategypage.com/dls/articles/2004617.asp


http://www.strategycenter.net/research/pubID.65/pub_detail.asp

http://weatherwars.blogspot.com/

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8884648292925739980

armeijat kirjoitti:

1) United States

2) China

3) United Kingdom

4) Russia

5) Israel

6) North Korea

7) South Korea

8) Saudi Arabia

9) Ukraine

10) India

Powerful militaries will consist of a large ground force but an Air Force, and Navy would be required for a military to be truly powerful.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Worldwide_military_spending_2005_%

armeijat kirjoitti:

1) United States

2) China

3) United Kingdom

4) Russia

5) Israel

6) North Korea

7) South Korea

8) Saudi Arabia

9) Ukraine

10) India

Powerful militaries will consist of a large ground force but an Air Force, and Navy would be required for a military to be truly powerful.

list is based on military tradition, resources, leadership, ability to mobolize, defensive power, technology, and economy.

1) USA - no one can come close to the lone superpower of the world. and to top it off, the United States of America spent over $500 billion last year on their military alone. The USA has dominated the seas for over 60 years and if you can control the seas, you can control other countries economies with blockades and so forth. Obviously militaries don't get more experience, technologically advanced, and powerful than the mighty United States of America.

2) China - They have the world's 2nd largest gold reserves in the world. The ability to mobolize millions of men combined with the ability to reverse engineer allows China to stay a major threat in the world despite their isolationist leaders. China's economy is booming and they deserve this ranking over Russia which is on the opposite spectrum of China when it comes to economies. Their man power can't be matched. China has a closer relationship with the former USSR and Russia does have incredible knowledge when it comes to missle guidance systems.

3) Russia - Even though they are incredibly corrupt and have an economy that has seen better days, Russia's technology is top notch. They have an amazing amount of tanks, artillery, and machinery (can't be matched anywhere in the world) that can quickly be mobolized for a strong defensive force. Russia has an abundance of scientists and are the world's leader in weather modification. Overall, Russia lacks the professionalism needed to net a top 2 ranking.

4) UK - Cutting edge technology and a very close relationship with the United States tips the scales in favor of the UK when it comes to most militaries around the world. The UK's military tradition, resources, and professionalism are amongst the best in the world. The UK also has the best special forces in the world.

5) France - They have an abundance of technology and wealth both since the great war ended, they haven't spent serious money on their military like many other countries have. France does have ample indigenous technology.

6) Israel - Probably the best defensive force in the world. Israel has great special forces and a very nice ally in the United States which allows them to benefit by gaining technology as well as resources needed to wage war. Some of the best pilots in the world are from Israel.

7) Germany - Great technology, but they rank so low because since Hitler they have not made their military priority #1. However, given time they could amass an incredible military force. They have the economy needed to go hand and hand with a successful military. The military tradition is certainly there.

8) India - Man Power, economy, this rising power has it all. They are well balance in all areas including the Navy, which is rare in the day and age of anti-ship missles. The only reason the Indians are so far down the list is because they are corrupted and lack OIL.

9) Turkey - One of the most powerful countries in their region, the Turks are very experienced fighting off Kurdish rebels and they have a very strong military tradition. Turkey, like Israel, would be one of the toughest countries in the world to invade due to their defensive capabilities. The country of Turkey has legendary leadership.

10) Pakistan - Pakistan has a large army as well as a booming economy. However, their lack of cutting edge technology coupled with the fact their Navy is medicore at best drops them to #10. However, they too are a fast riser.

Just missed the cut:

Korea, North
Korea, South
Japan

Totuus on kyllä toinen! kirjoitti:

list is based on military tradition, resources, leadership, ability to mobolize, defensive power, technology, and economy.

1) USA - no one can come close to the lone superpower of the world. and to top it off, the United States of America spent over $500 billion last year on their military alone. The USA has dominated the seas for over 60 years and if you can control the seas, you can control other countries economies with blockades and so forth. Obviously militaries don't get more experience, technologically advanced, and powerful than the mighty United States of America.

2) China - They have the world's 2nd largest gold reserves in the world. The ability to mobolize millions of men combined with the ability to reverse engineer allows China to stay a major threat in the world despite their isolationist leaders. China's economy is booming and they deserve this ranking over Russia which is on the opposite spectrum of China when it comes to economies. Their man power can't be matched. China has a closer relationship with the former USSR and Russia does have incredible knowledge when it comes to missle guidance systems.

3) Russia - Even though they are incredibly corrupt and have an economy that has seen better days, Russia's technology is top notch. They have an amazing amount of tanks, artillery, and machinery (can't be matched anywhere in the world) that can quickly be mobolized for a strong defensive force. Russia has an abundance of scientists and are the world's leader in weather modification. Overall, Russia lacks the professionalism needed to net a top 2 ranking.

4) UK - Cutting edge technology and a very close relationship with the United States tips the scales in favor of the UK when it comes to most militaries around the world. The UK's military tradition, resources, and professionalism are amongst the best in the world. The UK also has the best special forces in the world.

5) France - They have an abundance of technology and wealth both since the great war ended, they haven't spent serious money on their military like many other countries have. France does have ample indigenous technology.

6) Israel - Probably the best defensive force in the world. Israel has great special forces and a very nice ally in the United States which allows them to benefit by gaining technology as well as resources needed to wage war. Some of the best pilots in the world are from Israel.

7) Germany - Great technology, but they rank so low because since Hitler they have not made their military priority #1. However, given time they could amass an incredible military force. They have the economy needed to go hand and hand with a successful military. The military tradition is certainly there.

8) India - Man Power, economy, this rising power has it all. They are well balance in all areas including the Navy, which is rare in the day and age of anti-ship missles. The only reason the Indians are so far down the list is because they are corrupted and lack OIL.

9) Turkey - One of the most powerful countries in their region, the Turks are very experienced fighting off Kurdish rebels and they have a very strong military tradition. Turkey, like Israel, would be one of the toughest countries in the world to invade due to their defensive capabilities. The country of Turkey has legendary leadership.

10) Pakistan - Pakistan has a large army as well as a booming economy. However, their lack of cutting edge technology coupled with the fact their Navy is medicore at best drops them to #10. However, they too are a fast riser.

Just missed the cut:

Korea, North
Korea, South
Japan

"Totuus on kyllä toinen"

Joo, teinipunikki kirjaston koneella on todellinen asiantuntija tässä asiassa.

Buhahahahhaaa!

Sivaripelle vielä todennäköisesti...

ilman Usan tukea, Israeli häviäisi tosiaan Ruotsille ja Suomellekin.

Täytyy tosiaan laskea, ettei pelkillä jaffoilla makseta kovinkaan pitkää sotaa, eihän tuo Israel ole kuin ahvenamaan kokoinen kaistale erämaata.

yliarvostettu kirjoitti:

ilman Usan tukea, Israeli häviäisi tosiaan Ruotsille ja Suomellekin.

Täytyy tosiaan laskea, ettei pelkillä jaffoilla makseta kovinkaan pitkää sotaa, eihän tuo Israel ole kuin ahvenamaan kokoinen kaistale erämaata.

Kun Israel pistäis muutaman "big boyn"ballististen päähän ja laukaisis tähän suuntaan, niin antisemitisteillä tulis kiire...