Virallista 911 -tarinaa puolustava Screw Loose Change -sivusto on postannut tällaisen lähinnä säälittävän vetoomuksen liberaaleille bloggereille:
"Liberal bloggers need to get involved as well. We've applauded blogs like the Daily Kos for its policy of banning 9-11 Truth diaries, but that's no longer adequate. Kos needs to encourage his front page bloggers to tackle the matter head on, and demand that liberal politicians begin responding more forcefully to debunk the kooks."
Miksi virallista tarinaa pitää muuten puolustaa, kun muut teoriat ovat vain "hullujen salaliittoteoreetikkojen" höpinöitä?
>Why exactly does the official story need defending? Didn't we have a 9/11 Commission to take care of all the questions? I mean we know Kean and Hamilton admit that it was a whitewash, but still is this really necessary?<
http://www.antiwar.com/eland/?articleid=9502
Vielä virkkarien hätääntynyttä puhelua:
"Democrats need to be more forceful about denouncing this craziness, because 9-11 Denial seems to be growing ..."
Mikä nyt niin virkkareita pelottaa?
"Liberal bloggers need to get involved as well. We've applauded blogs like the Daily Kos for its policy of banning 9-11 Truth diaries, but that's no longer adequate. Kos needs to encourage his front page bloggers to tackle the matter head on, and demand that liberal politicians begin responding more forcefully to debunk the kooks."
Miksi virallista tarinaa pitää muuten puolustaa, kun muut teoriat ovat vain "hullujen salaliittoteoreetikkojen" höpinöitä?
>Why exactly does the official story need defending? Didn't we have a 9/11 Commission to take care of all the questions? I mean we know Kean and Hamilton admit that it was a whitewash, but still is this really necessary?<
http://www.antiwar.com/eland/?articleid=9502
Vielä virkkarien hätääntynyttä puhelua:
"Democrats need to be more forceful about denouncing this craziness, because 9-11 Denial seems to be growing ..."
Mikä nyt niin virkkareita pelottaa?
Vastaukset 1
Vanhimmat
pelottaa! Ei se sen omituisempaa ole.