Todella mielenkiintoinen artikkeli:
"...How many electrons does it take to remember everything on your hard disk?
Theoretically speaking, ONLY ONE, providing that the information is cleverly phase-encoded in its fundamental modes of oscillation.
If you think that this is a joke, wishful thinking or some speculation, think again. Ahn, Weinacht and Bucksbaum from the University of Michigan were the first to demonstrate experimentally [4], on a small scale, that information can indeed be phase-encoded in electrons using light (i.e. photons).
The theoretical storage capacity of a single electron, or even a single photon of light, has been agreed to be phenomenal [5], even though the actual encoding and retrieving of the information using the technology available to us today remains a major challenge..."
KOKO JUTTU:
http://nujournal.net/choice.html
"...How many electrons does it take to remember everything on your hard disk?
Theoretically speaking, ONLY ONE, providing that the information is cleverly phase-encoded in its fundamental modes of oscillation.
If you think that this is a joke, wishful thinking or some speculation, think again. Ahn, Weinacht and Bucksbaum from the University of Michigan were the first to demonstrate experimentally [4], on a small scale, that information can indeed be phase-encoded in electrons using light (i.e. photons).
The theoretical storage capacity of a single electron, or even a single photon of light, has been agreed to be phenomenal [5], even though the actual encoding and retrieving of the information using the technology available to us today remains a major challenge..."
KOKO JUTTU:
http://nujournal.net/choice.html
Vastaukset 2
Vanhimmat
Miksi teet jatkuvasti aloituksia samasta artikkelista? Yritätkö myydä sitä Chalkon kirjaa?
Menisit vaikka Huuto.nettiin.
Ps.Tuon artikkelin lähdeviitteisiin kuuluu mm. yhden ufouskovaisen sieppaustarina (Thiaoouba Profecy), yhden aurannäkijän ja kirliankuvaajan huuhaakirja (K.Korotkov), Tuomaksen evankeliumi sekä äijän oma kirja.
Ei ihan vakuuta.
Mitä luulet "theoretically speaking":in tarkoittavan?
Se, että joku asiassa on teorisoitavissa, ei vielä tarkoita, että se olisi todellisuutta.
Analoginen esimerkki: "Maxwell's demon can, theoretically speaking, move slow molecules through a barrier from a cold reservoir to a hot reservoir". Kuitenkin Maxwellin demoni on osoitettu mahdottomaksi konseptiksi.