SAATANA ON RAAMATUSTA!!!

maailman 3. kovin verotus. Tai no, oikeastaan syy on äänestävissä, heistä moni kuitenkin on evlutku.

Öö. Kansantaruissa on peikkoja ja pahoja henkiä.
Kummituksia ja vainajia. 'Henkiä' siis.
Ei Saatana, pahan arkkityyppi siis ole 'raamatun' oma keksintö vaan on helppoa luoda hyvälle vasta kohta. Ylä ja ala ja musta ja valko.

Aina kun 'valloitususkonto' koittaa pestä muut jumalat, alkaa toisten tapojen ja uskontojen mustamaalaaminen harhoina ja saatana on sitten tämä joka saa tästä näkökulmasta käsin ottaa vastuun.

-->Mutta hyvä ja paha , dualismi on aina mukana.

Hyvät teot vie elämässä eteenpäin ja pahat teot aiheuttavat äkki kuolemia... tällainen on tämä taikausko. Siihen vielä luulo että kaikkialla on henkimaailman olioita ja soppa on valmis.

Enää tarvitaan pelkojen riivaaman pelastaja, ja siihen rukoilijat ja saarnaajat ovat kuin piste iin päälle.

He pakkopaita.

Saatana on juutalaisen tradition mukaan syyttäjä joka jumalan käskystä vaeltaa keskuudessamme ja etsii syntisiä uskovaisia. Tämä jumalan luoma enkeli ahdistelee siis vain uskovaisia. Ei ketään muita. Mutta sehän me jo tiedettiinkin.

"Where Satan does appear in the Bible, he plays the role of the Accuser.

According to the article on 'Satan' in the Jewish Encyclopedia, Satan's role as the accuser is found:
“    in the prologue to the Book of Job, where Satan appears, together with other celestial beings before the Deity, replying to the inquiry of God as to whence he had come, with the words: 'From going to and fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it.' (Job 1:7) Both question and answer, as well as the dialogue which follows, characterize Satan as having the evil purpose of searching out men's sins and appearing as their accuser. He is, therefore, the celestial prosecutor, who sees only iniquity; for he persists in his evil opinion of Job even after the man of Uz has passed successfully through his first trial by surrendering to the will of God, whereupon Satan demands another test through physical suffering. (ib. ii. 3-5.)    ”
“    Yet it is also evident from the prologue that Satan has no power of independent action, but requires the permission of God, which he may not transgress. He cannot be regarded, therefore, as an opponent of the Deity; and the doctrine of monotheism is disturbed by his existence no more than by the presence of other beings before the face of God. This view is also retained in Zech. 3:1-2, where Satan is described as the adversary of the high priest Joshua, and of the people of God whose representative the hierarch is; and he there opposes the 'angel of the Lord' who bids him be silent in the name of God.    ”
“    In both of these passages Satan acts only under permission; but in I Chron. 21:1 he appears as one who is able to provoke David to destroy Israel. The Chronicler (third century B.C.) regards Satan as an independent agent, a view which is the more striking since the source whence he drew his account (II Sam. 24:1) speaks of God Himself as the one who moved David against the children of Israel. Since the older conception refers all events, whether good or bad, to God alone, (I Sam. 16:14; I Kings 22:22; Isa. 45:7; etc) it is possible that the Chronicler, and perhaps even Zechariah, were influenced by Zoroastrianism, even though in the case of the prophet Jewish monism strongly opposed Iranian dualism. (Stave, Einfluss des Parsismus auf das Judenthum, pp. 253 et seq.) An immediate influence of the Babylonian concept of the 'accuser, persecutor, and oppressor' (Schrader, K. A. T. 3d ed., p. 463) is impossible, since traces of such an influence, if it had existed, would have appeared in the earlier portions of the Bible."[10]"