Täällä vedotaan aina tieteeseen, niinpä on hyvä tietää myös ketkä olivat Jeesukseen uskovia tiedemiehiä.
1.Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543)
Copernicus was the Polish astronomer who put forward the first mathematically based system of planets going around the sun. He attended various European universities, and became a Canon in the Catholic church in 1497. His new system was actually first presented in the Vatican gardens in 1533 before Pope Clement VII who approved, and Copernicus was urged to publish around this time. Copernicus was never under any threat of religious persecution - and was urged to publish both by Catholic Bishop Guise, Cardinal Schonberg, and the Protestant Professor George Rheticus. Copernicus referred sometimes to God in his works, and did not see his system as in conflict with the Bible.
2.Johannes Kepler (1571-1630)
Kepler was a brilliant mathematician and astronomer. He did early work on light, and established the laws of planetary motion about the sun. He also came close to reaching the Newtonian concept of universal gravity - well before Newton was born! His introduction of the idea of force in astronomy changed it radically in a modern direction. Kepler was an extremely sincere and pious Lutheran, whose works on astronomy contain writings about how space and the heavenly bodies represent the Trinity. Kepler suffered no persecution for his open avowal of the sun-centered system, and, indeed, was allowed as a Protestant to stay in Catholic Graz as a Professor (1595-1600) when other Protestants had been expelled!
3.Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
Galileo is often remembered for his conflict with the Roman Catholic Church. His controversial work on the solar system was published in 1633. It had no proofs of a sun-centered system (Galileo's telescope discoveries did not indicate a moving earth) and his one "proof" based upon the tides was invalid. It ignored the correct elliptical orbits of planets published twenty five years earlier by Kepler. Since his work finished by putting the Pope's favorite argument in the mouth of the simpleton in the dialogue, the Pope (an old friend of Galileo's) was very offended. After the "trial" and being forbidden to teach the sun-centered system, Galileo did his most useful theoretical work, which was on dynamics. Galileo expressly said that the Bible cannot err, he saw his system as concerning the issue of how the Bible should be interpreted.
4.Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
Descartes was a French mathematician, scientist and philosopher who has been called the father of modern philosophy. His school studies made him dissatisfied with previous philosophy: He had a deep religious faith as a Catholic, which he retained to his dying day, along with a resolute, passionate desire to discover the truth. At the age of 24 he had a dream, and felt the vocational call to seek to bring knowledge together in one system of thought. His system began by asking what could be known if all else were doubted - suggesting the famous "I think therefore I am". Actually, it is often forgotten that the next step for Descartes was to establish the near certainty of the existence of God - for only if God both exists and would not want us to be deceived by our experiences can we trust our senses and logical thought processes. God is, therefore, central to his whole philosophy. What he really wanted was to see his philosophy adopted as standard Catholic teaching. Rene Descartes and Francis Bacon (1561-1626) are generally regarded as the key figures in the development of scientific methodology. Both had systems in which God was important, and both seem more devout than the average for their era.
5.Isaac Newton (1642-1727)
In optics, mechanics, and mathematics, Newton was a figure of undisputed genius and innovation. In all his science (including chemistry) he saw mathematics and numbers as central. What is less well known is that he was devoutly religious and saw numbers as involved in understanding from the Bible God's plan for history. He did a lot of work on biblical numerology, and, though aspects of his beliefs were not orthodox, he thought theology very important. In his system of physics, God is essential to the nature and absoluteness of space. In Principia he stated, "The most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion on an intelligent and powerful Being."
6.Robert Boyle (1791-1867)
One of the founders and key early members of the Royal Society, Boyle gave his name to "Boyle's Law" for gasses, and also wrote an important work on chemistry. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "By his will he endowed a series of Boyle lectures, or sermons, which still continue, "for proving the Christian religion against notorious infidels."... As a devout Protestant, Boyle took a special interest in promoting the Christian religion abroad, giving money to translate and publish the New Testament into Irish and Turkish. In 1690 he developed his theological views in The Christian Virtuoso, which he wrote to show that the study of nature was a central religious duty." Boyle wrote against atheists in his day (the notion that atheism is a modern invention is a myth), and was clearly much more devoutly Christian than the average in his era.
7.Michael Faraday (1791-1867)
The son of a blacksmith who became one of the greatest scientists of the 19th century. His work on electricity and magnetism not only revolutionized physics, but has led to so much in our lifestyles today which depend on them (including computers and telephone lines and so Web sites). Faraday was a devoutly Christian member of the Sandemanians, which significantly influenced upon him and strongly affected the way in which he approached and interpreted nature. The Sandemanians originated from Presbyterians who had rejected the idea of state churches, and tried to go back to a New Testament type of Christianity.
8.Gregor Mendel (1822-1884)
Mendel was the first to lay the mathematical foundations of genetics, in what came to be called "Mendelianism". He began his research in 1856 (three years before Darwin published his Origin of Species) in the garden of the Monastery in which he was a monk. Mendel was elected Abbot of his Monastery in 1868. His work remained comparatively unknown until the turn of the century, when a new generation of botanists began finding similar results and "rediscovered" him (though their ideas were not identical to his). An interesting point is that the 1860's was the formation of the X-Club, dedicated to lessening religious influences and propagating an image of "conflict" between science and religion. One sympathizer was Darwin's cousin Francis Galton, whose scientific interest was in genetics (a proponent of eugenics - selective breeding among humans to "improve" the stock). He was writing how the "priestly mind" was not conducive to science whilst, at around the same time, an Austrian monk was making the breakthrough in genetics. The rediscovery of the work of Mendel came too late to affect Galton's contribution.
9.Kelvin (William Thompson) (1824-1907)
Kelvin was foremost among the small group of British scientists who helped to lay the foundations of modern physics. His work covered may areas of physics, and he was said to have more letters after his name than anyone else in the Commonwealth, since he received numerous honorary degrees from European Universities who recognized the value of his work. He was a very committed Christian, certainly more religious than the average for his era. Interestingly, his fellow physicists George Gabriel Stokes (1819-1903) and James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) were also men of deep Christian commitment, in an era when many were nominal, apathetic, or anti-Christian. The Encyclopedia Britannica says "Maxwell is regarded by most modern physicists as the scientist of the 19th century who had the greatest influence on 20th century physics; he is ranked with Sir Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein for the fundamental nature of his contributions." Lord Kelvin was an Old Earth creationist, who estimated the Earth's age to be somewhere between 20 million and 100 million years, with an upper limit at 500 million years based on cooling rates (a low estimate due to his lack of knowledge about radiogenic heating).
10.Max Planck (1858-1947)
Planck made many contributions to physics, but is best known for quantum theory, which has revolutionized our understanding of the atomic and sub-atomic worlds. In his 1937 lecture "Religion and Naturwissenschaft," Planck expressed the view that God is everywhere present, and held that "the holiness of the unintelligible Godhead is conveyed by the holiness of symbols." Atheists, he thought, attach too much importance to what are merely symbols. Planck was a churchwarden from 1920 until his death, and believed in an almighty, all-knowing, beneficent God (though not necessarily a personal one). Both science and religion wage a "tireless battle against skepticism and dogmatism, against unbelief and superstition" with the goal "toward God!"
11.Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
Einstein is probably the best known and most highly revered scientist of the twentieth century, and is associated with major revolutions in our thinking about time, gravity, and the conversion of matter to energy (E=mc2). Although never coming to belief in a personal God, he recognized the impossibility of a non-created universe. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "Firmly denying atheism, Einstein expressed a belief in "Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the harmony of what exists." This actually motivated his interest in science, as he once remarked to a young physicist: "I want to know how God created this world, I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details." Einstein's famous epithet on the "uncertainty principle" was "God does not play dice" - and to him this was a real statement about a God in whom he believed. A famous saying of his was "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
Olivatko he väärässä?
1.Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543)
Copernicus was the Polish astronomer who put forward the first mathematically based system of planets going around the sun. He attended various European universities, and became a Canon in the Catholic church in 1497. His new system was actually first presented in the Vatican gardens in 1533 before Pope Clement VII who approved, and Copernicus was urged to publish around this time. Copernicus was never under any threat of religious persecution - and was urged to publish both by Catholic Bishop Guise, Cardinal Schonberg, and the Protestant Professor George Rheticus. Copernicus referred sometimes to God in his works, and did not see his system as in conflict with the Bible.
2.Johannes Kepler (1571-1630)
Kepler was a brilliant mathematician and astronomer. He did early work on light, and established the laws of planetary motion about the sun. He also came close to reaching the Newtonian concept of universal gravity - well before Newton was born! His introduction of the idea of force in astronomy changed it radically in a modern direction. Kepler was an extremely sincere and pious Lutheran, whose works on astronomy contain writings about how space and the heavenly bodies represent the Trinity. Kepler suffered no persecution for his open avowal of the sun-centered system, and, indeed, was allowed as a Protestant to stay in Catholic Graz as a Professor (1595-1600) when other Protestants had been expelled!
3.Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
Galileo is often remembered for his conflict with the Roman Catholic Church. His controversial work on the solar system was published in 1633. It had no proofs of a sun-centered system (Galileo's telescope discoveries did not indicate a moving earth) and his one "proof" based upon the tides was invalid. It ignored the correct elliptical orbits of planets published twenty five years earlier by Kepler. Since his work finished by putting the Pope's favorite argument in the mouth of the simpleton in the dialogue, the Pope (an old friend of Galileo's) was very offended. After the "trial" and being forbidden to teach the sun-centered system, Galileo did his most useful theoretical work, which was on dynamics. Galileo expressly said that the Bible cannot err, he saw his system as concerning the issue of how the Bible should be interpreted.
4.Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
Descartes was a French mathematician, scientist and philosopher who has been called the father of modern philosophy. His school studies made him dissatisfied with previous philosophy: He had a deep religious faith as a Catholic, which he retained to his dying day, along with a resolute, passionate desire to discover the truth. At the age of 24 he had a dream, and felt the vocational call to seek to bring knowledge together in one system of thought. His system began by asking what could be known if all else were doubted - suggesting the famous "I think therefore I am". Actually, it is often forgotten that the next step for Descartes was to establish the near certainty of the existence of God - for only if God both exists and would not want us to be deceived by our experiences can we trust our senses and logical thought processes. God is, therefore, central to his whole philosophy. What he really wanted was to see his philosophy adopted as standard Catholic teaching. Rene Descartes and Francis Bacon (1561-1626) are generally regarded as the key figures in the development of scientific methodology. Both had systems in which God was important, and both seem more devout than the average for their era.
5.Isaac Newton (1642-1727)
In optics, mechanics, and mathematics, Newton was a figure of undisputed genius and innovation. In all his science (including chemistry) he saw mathematics and numbers as central. What is less well known is that he was devoutly religious and saw numbers as involved in understanding from the Bible God's plan for history. He did a lot of work on biblical numerology, and, though aspects of his beliefs were not orthodox, he thought theology very important. In his system of physics, God is essential to the nature and absoluteness of space. In Principia he stated, "The most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion on an intelligent and powerful Being."
6.Robert Boyle (1791-1867)
One of the founders and key early members of the Royal Society, Boyle gave his name to "Boyle's Law" for gasses, and also wrote an important work on chemistry. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "By his will he endowed a series of Boyle lectures, or sermons, which still continue, "for proving the Christian religion against notorious infidels."... As a devout Protestant, Boyle took a special interest in promoting the Christian religion abroad, giving money to translate and publish the New Testament into Irish and Turkish. In 1690 he developed his theological views in The Christian Virtuoso, which he wrote to show that the study of nature was a central religious duty." Boyle wrote against atheists in his day (the notion that atheism is a modern invention is a myth), and was clearly much more devoutly Christian than the average in his era.
7.Michael Faraday (1791-1867)
The son of a blacksmith who became one of the greatest scientists of the 19th century. His work on electricity and magnetism not only revolutionized physics, but has led to so much in our lifestyles today which depend on them (including computers and telephone lines and so Web sites). Faraday was a devoutly Christian member of the Sandemanians, which significantly influenced upon him and strongly affected the way in which he approached and interpreted nature. The Sandemanians originated from Presbyterians who had rejected the idea of state churches, and tried to go back to a New Testament type of Christianity.
8.Gregor Mendel (1822-1884)
Mendel was the first to lay the mathematical foundations of genetics, in what came to be called "Mendelianism". He began his research in 1856 (three years before Darwin published his Origin of Species) in the garden of the Monastery in which he was a monk. Mendel was elected Abbot of his Monastery in 1868. His work remained comparatively unknown until the turn of the century, when a new generation of botanists began finding similar results and "rediscovered" him (though their ideas were not identical to his). An interesting point is that the 1860's was the formation of the X-Club, dedicated to lessening religious influences and propagating an image of "conflict" between science and religion. One sympathizer was Darwin's cousin Francis Galton, whose scientific interest was in genetics (a proponent of eugenics - selective breeding among humans to "improve" the stock). He was writing how the "priestly mind" was not conducive to science whilst, at around the same time, an Austrian monk was making the breakthrough in genetics. The rediscovery of the work of Mendel came too late to affect Galton's contribution.
9.Kelvin (William Thompson) (1824-1907)
Kelvin was foremost among the small group of British scientists who helped to lay the foundations of modern physics. His work covered may areas of physics, and he was said to have more letters after his name than anyone else in the Commonwealth, since he received numerous honorary degrees from European Universities who recognized the value of his work. He was a very committed Christian, certainly more religious than the average for his era. Interestingly, his fellow physicists George Gabriel Stokes (1819-1903) and James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) were also men of deep Christian commitment, in an era when many were nominal, apathetic, or anti-Christian. The Encyclopedia Britannica says "Maxwell is regarded by most modern physicists as the scientist of the 19th century who had the greatest influence on 20th century physics; he is ranked with Sir Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein for the fundamental nature of his contributions." Lord Kelvin was an Old Earth creationist, who estimated the Earth's age to be somewhere between 20 million and 100 million years, with an upper limit at 500 million years based on cooling rates (a low estimate due to his lack of knowledge about radiogenic heating).
10.Max Planck (1858-1947)
Planck made many contributions to physics, but is best known for quantum theory, which has revolutionized our understanding of the atomic and sub-atomic worlds. In his 1937 lecture "Religion and Naturwissenschaft," Planck expressed the view that God is everywhere present, and held that "the holiness of the unintelligible Godhead is conveyed by the holiness of symbols." Atheists, he thought, attach too much importance to what are merely symbols. Planck was a churchwarden from 1920 until his death, and believed in an almighty, all-knowing, beneficent God (though not necessarily a personal one). Both science and religion wage a "tireless battle against skepticism and dogmatism, against unbelief and superstition" with the goal "toward God!"
11.Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
Einstein is probably the best known and most highly revered scientist of the twentieth century, and is associated with major revolutions in our thinking about time, gravity, and the conversion of matter to energy (E=mc2). Although never coming to belief in a personal God, he recognized the impossibility of a non-created universe. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "Firmly denying atheism, Einstein expressed a belief in "Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the harmony of what exists." This actually motivated his interest in science, as he once remarked to a young physicist: "I want to know how God created this world, I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details." Einstein's famous epithet on the "uncertainty principle" was "God does not play dice" - and to him this was a real statement about a God in whom he believed. A famous saying of his was "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
Olivatko he väärässä?
Vastaukset 21
Vanhimmat
olivat. Saat kohtapuolin vastauksia. Tosin joltain joka jaksaa kirjoittaa asioista.
terv: *höpisijä*
Muihin henkilöihin en ole perehtynyt, mutta Einstein ei missään nimessä uskonut Jeesukseen. Eikä kaikkein vähiten sen takia, että hän oli juutalainen. Eikä hän kyllä muutenkaan ollut uskovaista sorttia. Tuo "Jumala ei heitä noppaa jne." juttu on totaalisesti irrotettu asiayhteydestään.
Jos luet esim. Max Planckia koskevan lainauksen, niin missä siinä mainitaan Jeesus?
Suurin osa listaamistasi tiedemiehistä on elänyt sellaisina aikoina, että heille olisi ollut itsemurha väittää olevansa ateisteja.
Einsteinin uskovaisuudesta ollaan montaa mieltä?
Hän oli kuitenkin aikansa innokkain raamatuntutkija ja lähinnä Raamatun numerologia
oli hänen lempiharrastuksensa, mutta ainakaan aktiiviaikanaan hän ei uskonut Jeesuksen, mutta antoi kuitenkin Jumalalle mahdollisuuden olla olemassa.
Ennen kuolemaansa hän saattoi tehdä lähentymisen
Jumalaa kohti, koska viitteitä löytyy muitakin, kuin tuo noppajuttu hänen viimeisistä lausunnoistaan? Vaikea mennä sanomaan hänen puolestaan.
Mitä tulee muuten noihin uskovaisiin tiedemiehiin kautta aikain, aina tähänpäivään asti, niin heidän joukkonsa on paljon suurempi, kuin moni uskookaan, ja eivät he mistään pelosta ole uskoneet, vaan ovat päätyneet pohdinnoissaan
näin uskomaan.
"Mitä tulee muuten noihin uskovaisiin tiedemiehiin kautta aikain, aina tähänpäivään asti, niin heidän joukkonsa on paljon suurempi, kuin moni uskookaan, ja eivät he mistään pelosta ole uskoneet, vaan ovat päätyneet pohdinnoissaan
näin uskomaan." Varmasti niiden joukko, jotka eivät usko, on paljon suurempi. Luonto mykistää monimutkaisuudellaan, mutta sen takaa on vaikeaa ellei mahdotonta löytää jumalaa. Ja kaikkein vähiten Jeesusta. Ainakaan jos on avoin mieli.
Tässä oli käsitykseni mukaan kysymys uskosta Jumalaan. Johonkin älyyn tai älykkääseen joka on pannut kaiken alulle tai luonut kaiken. Miten liittyy Jeesus siihen?
..se avomielinen sieltä löytää sitten, luonnosta? Räjähdyksen?
Jos avomielinen näkee jossain erityisen hyvällä maulla rakennetun talon jonka ympäristötkin ovat hyvin hoidetut ja esteettisesti puhuttelevat, niin minkä johtopäätöksen tekee Allin avoin mieli?
Senkö että "onpa siinä täytynyt olla kova räjäys"? Vai tuleeko siihen avoimeen mieleen ehkä ajatus että se ihastuttava kokonaisuus on jonkun käsien työtä, eli että sen on jonkun täytynyt rakentaa? Silti on itse asiassa kysymys kokolailla yksinkertaisesta rakennelmasta. Samalla hengenvedolla sama avoin mieli on kuitenkin valmis kuittaamaan 'monimutkaisuudellaan mykistävän luonnon' yksinkertaisesti "kehityksen" tulokseksi "big bangin" seurauksena. Pitää olla todella avoin mieli!
"Jos avomielinen näkee jossain erityisen hyvällä maulla rakennetun talon jonka ympäristötkin ovat hyvin hoidetut ja esteettisesti puhuttelevat, niin minkä johtopäätöksen tekee Allin avoin mieli?
Senkö että "onpa siinä täytynyt olla kova räjäys"?"
Olet selvästi "pohtinut" asioita. Pitkälle et ole päässyt. Ensinnäkin, älä sekoita makro- ja mikromaailman asioita, elävää ja elotonta. Se on niin perustavaa laatua oleva virhe, että keskustelua on turha jatkaa ennen kuin tämä on sinulle selvää.
Siis? Sekoita makro- ja mikromaailman asioita? Kehitysoppi on ne jo humussaan sekoittanut niinkuin kaikki muutkin käsitteet niin perusteellisesti että siihen voi uskoa enää vain jos on erittäin hyväuskoinen. Allinkaan avoin mieli ei ole tullut pidemmälle näköjään kuin big-bangiin. Ja näyttää siinä pysyvän!
Et pitkälle tieteelisesti pötki. Toisaalta Einstein kohta on vääristelyä, missä on moraalisi kerationisti?
Einstein kirjoitteli kommunistien lehteen ja
kehui Stalinia ja hänen (näytös)oikeudenkäyntejään
oikeiksi toimenpiteiksi.
(Lähde Fölsing, Einsteinin elämäkerta suom Hyrkäs)
Kapitalismista kilpailua inhoavana hän valitsi mieluummin sosialismin.
Jos maailman älykkäin tiedemies valitsi noin, niin
tottahan siekii osaat valita saman...
terv. kapitalisti.
Lista kääntyneistä kreationisteista by KAT 11/2000
===================================
Nämä kreationistit ovat luopuneet nuoren maan kreationismista, YEC:stä.
Osa jopa koko kreationismistaan ja alkaneet ottaa evoluution todesta.
Osa kääntyneistä myös kertoo, miten kreationistit vääristävät
tiedettä.
-Dr.G.F.Aadrsma, ICR:n Impact artikkelien tärkeimmistä kirjoittajista,
on eronnut ICR:stä joku aika sitten, eron syynä ettei voinut hyväksyä
ICRn arviota maan iälle. Aardsma on vakuuttunut puun vuosirengasdatan
johdosta, ettei maa voi mahdollisesti olla niin nuori kuin 6000 vuotta.
-J. Lawrence Kulp, ASAn jäsen tuli C-14 menetelmän tulosten pohjalta
siihen tulokseen ettei ole voi "välttyä" siltä tulkinnalta, että
ihmissuku on vanha. Hän kertoi tämän yhdistyneelle ASA:n ja DGS:n
ryhmälle v. 1949. Tuloksena välirikko.
-Ph.D Davis Young, aiemmin Morriksen Genesikseen uskonut "avasi silmänsä"
tohtorintyötänsä Eckelmannin ja Brownin kanssa tehdessään ja tuli siihen
tulokseen "tulvageologit" opettaa "pahaa geologista tiedettä" ja
kirjoitti siitä kirjankin (Young,1977)
-Ph.D. Nicholas Rupke, kävi samantapaisesti kuin Youngilla,
CRS:n(Creation Research Society) innostamana meni Princetoniin ja
teki Ph.D:n 1972. Valmistui hyväksyen evoluution ja hyläten perheensä
uskon, meni Oxfordiin.
-Ph.D. Harold James, Jr., geologi, otti osaa 7:n päivän adventistien
seminaariin, värvättiin Adentistien GRIin ja varoilla, mutta PhD:n
saatuaan "havaittiin muuttuneen niin harhaoppiseksi" että ehdotettiin
"irtisanomista" GRIstä.
-Edward Lugenbeal tutki esihistoriaa ja arkeologiaa ennen eroamistaan GRIsta
ja syyttäen sitä "emotionaalisesti ja eettisesti heikentävänä yrityksenä
tukea ihmisten uskoa kertomalla heille sarjan osatotuuksia tieteestä"
Ylipäänsä harva nuori kreationisti geologi näyttää säilyttäneen
fundamentalistisen uskonsa. Ilmeisesti kivien ja kallioiden kertoma
on niin räikeässä ristiriidassa kreationisten dogmien kanssa.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Lähteitä
*http://www.csun.edu/~vcgeo005/wise.htm
*http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/ce/2/part1.html
Numbers, R. L. 1993. The Creationists: The Evolution of Scientific
Creationism, University of California Press, Berkeley, 458 p.
Young, D. A. 1977. Creation and the flood, Baker Book House,
Grand Rapids, 217 p.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Lyhenteitä.
YEC=Nuoren maan kreationismi, maa 6000-10 000 v. vanha, luomisoppi
OEC=Vanhan maan kreationismi, maa miljardeja v vanha, luomisoppi
ICR=Istitute of Creation Research (kreationistien sylttytehdas nro 1)
CRS=Creation Research Society
DGS=Deluge Geological Society (DGS) (lähinnä 7:n pv:n adventisteja)
ASA=the American Scientific Affiliation (ASA). (lähinnä Babtisteja)
GRI= Avdentist Geological Research Institute
Tiedemies on sellainen, joka sovittaa uskon havaintoihin eikä päinvastoin.
Jokainen järkevä tiedemies sovittaa uskon havaintoihin. Ja lähes jokainen ajatteleva tiedemies on havainnut että lajien kehitys on mahdotonta ja johdonmukaisesti edelleen että on oltava joku äly joka on kaiken takana. Ainoa mikä heitä pitää kiinni kehitysopissa on joko raha tai opportunismi, ylpeys siis. Ei ole nöyryyttä myöntää olleensa väärässä, niinkuin sir Fred Hoyle(eräs "big bang"-teorian alullepanijoita), joka sanoi että: "Ensinäkemällä kaikki näytti siltä että "big bang" oli ainoa mahdollisuus". Tarkempien tutkimusten jälkeen hän kuitenkin nöyrästi myönsi että kaikkeudella täytyy olla luoja ja alkuunpanija.
Niin että maailman kymmenet tai sadattuhannet tiedemiehet sen kun valehtevat ja petkuttavat-rahasta ja ties mistä syystä...
Hoyle oli agnostikko ,se että hän ei uskonut Big Bangiin vaan nk. jatkuvan luomisen teoriaan ei tarkoita että hän olisi uskonut jonkin jumalolennon luovan elämää ja avaruutta.
Maapallon elämän Hole uskoi tulleen tänne avaruudesta, joltain komeetalta. Hän ei uskonut että "alussa loi jumala aatamin..."
Hoyle oli väärässä.
Itsekin Hoyle myönsi olleensa väärässä. Että tiedemiehenä hän ei voi puolustaa ensimmäistä teoriaansa "big bang"ista.
Mutta edelleen tiedemiehenä hän sanoi että tarkemmin avaruutta tutkien voi vain havaita suuremman älyn olemassaolon.
Se siitä!
No kyllähän Fred Hoyle pilkkasi alkuräjähdysteoriaa (jonka lanseerasi muistaakseni Belgialainen pappi Georges Lematre) ja haukkui sitä "Big Bangiksi".
Tämä pilkkanimi jäikin elämään.
Nykytiedon valossa tapahtumaa ("big bang")pidetään erittäin todennäköisenä.
..uskoo joulupukkiinkin!
Nii, jotkut uskovat joulupukin sijaan jopa seemiläisten kansojen jumala-taruihin.
Vähän aikaa sitten kaikki ihmiset, niin viisaat kuin tyhmätkin, uskoivat auringon kiertävän maata. Maan uskottiin olevan litteä. Ei tiedetty myöskään että ajattelu tapahtuu pään sisällä aivoja käyttäen.
tämä poikkeaa jonkin verran itse
aiheesta mutta on kuitenkin sanottava että
evoluution yksinkertaisin kaava on :
köyhä mies muuntautuu nokian Ollilaksi
kävelee pankkiin ja nostaa tilin tyhjäksi
sitten nauttii helposta loppuelämästä
naureskellen partaansa ja litkien kaljaansa
sitten paljon myöhemmin sairastuu maksakir-
roosiin ja niinpä hän muuntautuu nuoreksi
suomalaiseksi jupiksi ja alkaa väittelemään
jumalan olemassa olosta.
"muuntautua" on kehittyä ja sopeutua vallitsevaan
todellisuuteen sellaisena kuin se on olemassa.