Vuosikausia meitä on johdettu harhaan ajattelemalla, että maailma ei todella liiku. Näin ei kuitenkaan ole asian laita.
http://www.staticearth.net/page28a.html
"A very common misconception, even amongst professional astronomers, is that telescopes provide us with a measure of distance. They do not. Exactly as with a microscope, the telescope is an optical instrument that simply provides an angular resolution greater than that of the human eye.
Consider, for instance, the following quotation taken from Rev. Alexander Hislop's scholarly book, "The Two Babylons," fourth edition, 1929: "There is this great difference between the works of men and the works of God, that the same minute and searching investigation, which displays the defects and imperfections of the one, brings out also the beauties of the other. ... If the microscope be brought to bear on the flowers of the field, ... instead of their beauty diminishing, new beauties and still more delicate, that have escaped the naked eye, are forthwith discovered."
We can see these intricacies through a microscope, not because the microscope is somehow looking 50-cm into the flower, but because it can resolve detail that our eye cannot. We see exactly the same thing as the microscope objective "sees," but we need the assistance of the microscope lenses, in conjunction with our own, to magnify and thereby resolve the detail."
Suosittelen lukemaan Foucaultin heilurista:
http://www.staticearth.net/page20.html
"Star speeds are not a problem when the thickness of the universe is seen to be
what it really is, that is, LESS than half a light day thick ( eight billion mile radius.)"
Ufoilta tippuu pohja pois. Siispä lentävätt lautaset ovat pelkästään Yhdysvaltojen aseteknologiaa eikä muuta, ja Jumala on olemassa ja rakastaa meitä.
http://www.staticearth.net/page28a.html
"A very common misconception, even amongst professional astronomers, is that telescopes provide us with a measure of distance. They do not. Exactly as with a microscope, the telescope is an optical instrument that simply provides an angular resolution greater than that of the human eye.
Consider, for instance, the following quotation taken from Rev. Alexander Hislop's scholarly book, "The Two Babylons," fourth edition, 1929: "There is this great difference between the works of men and the works of God, that the same minute and searching investigation, which displays the defects and imperfections of the one, brings out also the beauties of the other. ... If the microscope be brought to bear on the flowers of the field, ... instead of their beauty diminishing, new beauties and still more delicate, that have escaped the naked eye, are forthwith discovered."
We can see these intricacies through a microscope, not because the microscope is somehow looking 50-cm into the flower, but because it can resolve detail that our eye cannot. We see exactly the same thing as the microscope objective "sees," but we need the assistance of the microscope lenses, in conjunction with our own, to magnify and thereby resolve the detail."
Suosittelen lukemaan Foucaultin heilurista:
http://www.staticearth.net/page20.html
"Star speeds are not a problem when the thickness of the universe is seen to be
what it really is, that is, LESS than half a light day thick ( eight billion mile radius.)"
Ufoilta tippuu pohja pois. Siispä lentävätt lautaset ovat pelkästään Yhdysvaltojen aseteknologiaa eikä muuta, ja Jumala on olemassa ja rakastaa meitä.
Vastaukset
Vanhimmat
Ei vielä vastauksia
Aloittaja odottaa vastauksia. Kerro oma näkemyksesi ensimmäisenä.