Maailma ei liiku

joo,

"The problem with the Big Bang scenario is, how after such "Bang," we obtained a universe with planets flying orderly around each other without collisions. (Meteorites are negligible). You can even calculate their movements with amazing precision. Is that a result of explosion?!"

Meinataanko nyt että maailman kaikkeuden "AIKA" kun "alkoi", niin se olisi "RÄJÄJDYS" ja se ei ole nykyisen universumin järjestyksen huomioon ottaen mahdollista? Jep, kun universumi "alkoi" oli vitusti vaikka dynamenttia, joka räjähti? Ehkäpä Big Bang teoriassa "Big Bang" on vaan nimitys asialle?

"That’s quite an intelligent and organized "Bang"… A mindless explosion would only create chaos with chunks of dirt flying around."

Tarkoittaako tämä sitä että asiat olisi jotenkin äärimmäisessä järjestyksessä nyt?

"There is another problem, what would create such an explosion in space without any reason? If the universe is expanding at the same speed away from Earth that would mean that Big Bang, or whatever it was, started from Earth."

Noniin, tämähän ei pidä paikkaansa ollenkaan. Universumi laajenee JOKAISESTA pisteestä valonnopeudella. Siis JOKAISESTA universumin pisteestä ajassa. Olikohan se nyt siis neliulotteinen tämä yksinkertaisempi aika-avaruus.

"Otherwise, the rate of expansion as perceived from Earth would be twice greater away from Big Bang and twice slower the opposite way. It also means that the Big Bang started from the Earth and it also means that the Earth is the center of the universe. If the rate of expansion was different in different directions then we could find the Big Bang point by finding the directions of bigger rates and slower rates and figuring out the position of Big Bang. On the top of that, the background microwave radiation is the same in all directions from Earth. The same holds true for gravity and the positions of galaxies. They are all relative to Earth."

Nyt en pysy kärryillä yhtään. Mutta jos maailmankaikkeus alkoi, voisi kuvitella että se myös jatkuu, koko ajan.

"If the universe started at a singularity like Big Bang, the laws of physics had to be obeyed from the beginning, otherwise it would create chaos, and from chaos there would be no order, because there would be no reason for order to be created by itself. If order were created by chance, how long would it last? Logically thinking, the order cannot be created from disorder. Why should it last? Before the universe started the physical laws did not exist, because there was no physical world, which is necessary for "physical" laws to exist. This proves that, the universe started in scientifically and orderly planned way. The universe must be perfectly balanced in every way or there would be chaos in no time. This theory works well with "Plus and Minus Rotation" theory (mine)."

Aloitetaan nyt vaikka fysiikan laesta. Ei vielä ymmärretä miten maailmankaikkeus toimii. CERNissä yritetään ottaa selvää pitääko Higs:in teoria paikkaansa huikkasten massan alkuperästä. Sekään ei selitä KAIKKIA fysiikan lakeja, ainoastaan että saatamme olla oikeilla jäljillä supersymmetrian suhteen.

"At the point of collapsing singularity the physical laws would not "brake," they would simply disappear in the opposite order in which they appeared. That of course, would be the case if something as ridiculous as a "singularity" would exist."

häh?