konservapedian vois kääntää suomeksi.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution
"Creation scientists believe that mutations, natural selection, and genetic drift would not cause macroevolution.[32] Furthermore, creation scientists assert that the life sciences as a whole support the creation model and do not support the theory of evolution.[33] Homology involves the theory that macroevolutionary relationships can be demonstrated by the similarity in the anatomy and physiology of different organisms.[34] An example of a homology argument is that DNA similarities between human and other living organisms is evidence for the theory of evolution.[35] Creation scientists assert that the homology argument is not a valid argument. Both evolutionary scientists and young earth creation scientists believe that speciation occurs, however, young earth creation scientists state that speciation generally occurs at a much faster rate than evolutionist believe is the case."
Tämäkin valheellinen ja väärä argumentointi osoittautui siis vääräksi viimeistään silloin kun havaittiin liskoilla uusia rakenteita jo 35 vuodessa. Evoluutio ei siis voi olla totta, koska se vaatii liikaa aikaa, jota eivät tosielämän havainnot puolla. Lue uudelleen.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution
"Creation scientists believe that mutations, natural selection, and genetic drift would not cause macroevolution.[32] Furthermore, creation scientists assert that the life sciences as a whole support the creation model and do not support the theory of evolution.[33] Homology involves the theory that macroevolutionary relationships can be demonstrated by the similarity in the anatomy and physiology of different organisms.[34] An example of a homology argument is that DNA similarities between human and other living organisms is evidence for the theory of evolution.[35] Creation scientists assert that the homology argument is not a valid argument. Both evolutionary scientists and young earth creation scientists believe that speciation occurs, however, young earth creation scientists state that speciation generally occurs at a much faster rate than evolutionist believe is the case."
Tämäkin valheellinen ja väärä argumentointi osoittautui siis vääräksi viimeistään silloin kun havaittiin liskoilla uusia rakenteita jo 35 vuodessa. Evoluutio ei siis voi olla totta, koska se vaatii liikaa aikaa, jota eivät tosielämän havainnot puolla. Lue uudelleen.
Vastaukset 2
Vanhimmat
kreationismin mallin, sitten voisimme tarkastella onko se tieteellinen.
ain aopetettu kouluissa, jollet halua uskoa on se oma-asiasi. Evoluutio sen sijaan ei ole fakta vaan kuuluisi filosofian tunneille.