On tullut aika purkaa uusliberalismin globaali talous.
Kaikki olemme huomanneet että se on ajanut, ei jäävuoreen vaan kuplaan.
Itse asiassa on länsi joutunut taloudellis-sotilaallisen hyökkäyksen kohteeksi!
Ja takana on tietyt pankkiirisuvut.
Mutta länsi ei vastahyökkää? todella outoa?
Suomen tulee välittömästi alkaa varmistaa ruoan kansallista omavaraisuutta joka elintarvikkeen alalta.
Tulevaisuudessa pitää jo tutkia miten Suomen maatalous pystyy vastaamaan imaston muutoksen haasteisiin ja mahdollisuuksiin.
Pankkien pönkittäminen veronmaksajien rahoilla on rikollista.
Pankit pitää kansallistaa, jos niistä on tulossa ongelma.
Kansalaispalkka 1500€ on välttämätön ja verotus alkaa vasta sen ylittävästä muusta tulosta.
Sotilaspolitiikassa on aivan VäLTTÄMÄTÖNTÄ että hylätä USA peseennuolenta ja haistattaa pitkät natolle.
Suomen puolustus pitää perustaa Suomen turvaamiselle ja tähän on teknologiaa ja toimintamalleja. kunhan vain puolustusvoimista saadaan natokiimainen aines pois.
EMP ym muut vastaavat aseet ovat nykypäivää, tälle tielle Suomenkin on mentävä, niitä tuskin on kaupan, mutta nittä voimme rakentaa, jopa yhtä hornettia halvemmalla.
Valehtelevat poliitikot ja riistävät yritysjohtajat on saatava kuriin!
Tässä edäs ENG lainaus:
Leadership in time of crisis is most often different than the leadership that prevails during calm and stable times. When the unknown presents, leadership differs from that which is required during familiar challenges. For Earth in the near future, the leadership that will emerge will be that which can deal with all known techniques for group preservation being questioned, all established expectations for intra-group cooperation being disappointed, and problems the group faces routinely overwhelming the resources of the group. In other words, the leadership will be taking a fresh approach, or will fail. This almost invariably excludes the establishment leadership, which has emerged during economic and geological stability. The qualities of leadership have been much analyzed, and training programs established, but captains of industry have emerged not from such programs but because of qualities within the captain himself. These qualities are often elusive and thus ascribed to something like charisma but their basis is something more simplistic. The cave man, facing physical dangers, selected the tallest, strongest, and most brutal among then to be their leaders. These same qualities that allow such a man to defend the group against large predators could be turned against any challenger in the group. This tradition extends to man's cultures today, where the leader that emerges is often a large, brutal man. It is only recently that women have begun to emerge as the chosen leaders in countries around the world.
Once the cave man could survive without constant fear of attack by large predators, other qualities determined the selection of a leader for the group. When conflicts between groups could not be settled by one group leaving to find new territory, then war between groups developed to resolve the conflicts, and the leader who was shrewd and cunning was the winner. The political game of chess whereby bribery or psychological manipulation was an advantage was born, and man has hardly moved from that tradition either. Today, the political leader selected by the populace is most often a large, brutal, and cunning man. It is only recently that the ability to cooperate with one's neighbors has been shown to be a more effective trait. When the world as a whole suffers crop shortages and natural disasters, then war does not solve a these problems. The addition of new territory only brings with it new headaches. During times of stability, the population turns its attention to gain for every household. Each head of family is concerned about gathering assets and their status within the community. Any leadership battles during such times involves promises, a type of bribery. Self promoting politicians promise that the changes they will bring will increase each family's asset base and give this or that sub-group more benefits and prestige. This all too familiar political dance thus packs the halls of power with self promoting liars, who are hardly suited to address a crisis when it comes along.
Since what is facing the Earth in the short term will be an immense crisis, the old models for leaders will be lacking in the qualities that mankind will need. After the first few weeks after the cataclysms, the problem of looting gangs and limited supplies will be sorted out, and then mankind will be faced with different challenges. There are few parts of the globe currently beset with large predators, so physical strength and brutality are outdated as leadership qualities. In fact, rewarding a large, brutal man with a leadership position puts the group into catatonia, as all fear to offend the leader with ideas. Where starvation is endemic, worldwide, and supplies
Kaikki olemme huomanneet että se on ajanut, ei jäävuoreen vaan kuplaan.
Itse asiassa on länsi joutunut taloudellis-sotilaallisen hyökkäyksen kohteeksi!
Ja takana on tietyt pankkiirisuvut.
Mutta länsi ei vastahyökkää? todella outoa?
Suomen tulee välittömästi alkaa varmistaa ruoan kansallista omavaraisuutta joka elintarvikkeen alalta.
Tulevaisuudessa pitää jo tutkia miten Suomen maatalous pystyy vastaamaan imaston muutoksen haasteisiin ja mahdollisuuksiin.
Pankkien pönkittäminen veronmaksajien rahoilla on rikollista.
Pankit pitää kansallistaa, jos niistä on tulossa ongelma.
Kansalaispalkka 1500€ on välttämätön ja verotus alkaa vasta sen ylittävästä muusta tulosta.
Sotilaspolitiikassa on aivan VäLTTÄMÄTÖNTÄ että hylätä USA peseennuolenta ja haistattaa pitkät natolle.
Suomen puolustus pitää perustaa Suomen turvaamiselle ja tähän on teknologiaa ja toimintamalleja. kunhan vain puolustusvoimista saadaan natokiimainen aines pois.
EMP ym muut vastaavat aseet ovat nykypäivää, tälle tielle Suomenkin on mentävä, niitä tuskin on kaupan, mutta nittä voimme rakentaa, jopa yhtä hornettia halvemmalla.
Valehtelevat poliitikot ja riistävät yritysjohtajat on saatava kuriin!
Tässä edäs ENG lainaus:
Leadership in time of crisis is most often different than the leadership that prevails during calm and stable times. When the unknown presents, leadership differs from that which is required during familiar challenges. For Earth in the near future, the leadership that will emerge will be that which can deal with all known techniques for group preservation being questioned, all established expectations for intra-group cooperation being disappointed, and problems the group faces routinely overwhelming the resources of the group. In other words, the leadership will be taking a fresh approach, or will fail. This almost invariably excludes the establishment leadership, which has emerged during economic and geological stability. The qualities of leadership have been much analyzed, and training programs established, but captains of industry have emerged not from such programs but because of qualities within the captain himself. These qualities are often elusive and thus ascribed to something like charisma but their basis is something more simplistic. The cave man, facing physical dangers, selected the tallest, strongest, and most brutal among then to be their leaders. These same qualities that allow such a man to defend the group against large predators could be turned against any challenger in the group. This tradition extends to man's cultures today, where the leader that emerges is often a large, brutal man. It is only recently that women have begun to emerge as the chosen leaders in countries around the world.
Once the cave man could survive without constant fear of attack by large predators, other qualities determined the selection of a leader for the group. When conflicts between groups could not be settled by one group leaving to find new territory, then war between groups developed to resolve the conflicts, and the leader who was shrewd and cunning was the winner. The political game of chess whereby bribery or psychological manipulation was an advantage was born, and man has hardly moved from that tradition either. Today, the political leader selected by the populace is most often a large, brutal, and cunning man. It is only recently that the ability to cooperate with one's neighbors has been shown to be a more effective trait. When the world as a whole suffers crop shortages and natural disasters, then war does not solve a these problems. The addition of new territory only brings with it new headaches. During times of stability, the population turns its attention to gain for every household. Each head of family is concerned about gathering assets and their status within the community. Any leadership battles during such times involves promises, a type of bribery. Self promoting politicians promise that the changes they will bring will increase each family's asset base and give this or that sub-group more benefits and prestige. This all too familiar political dance thus packs the halls of power with self promoting liars, who are hardly suited to address a crisis when it comes along.
Since what is facing the Earth in the short term will be an immense crisis, the old models for leaders will be lacking in the qualities that mankind will need. After the first few weeks after the cataclysms, the problem of looting gangs and limited supplies will be sorted out, and then mankind will be faced with different challenges. There are few parts of the globe currently beset with large predators, so physical strength and brutality are outdated as leadership qualities. In fact, rewarding a large, brutal man with a leadership position puts the group into catatonia, as all fear to offend the leader with ideas. Where starvation is endemic, worldwide, and supplies
Vastaukset 1
Vanhimmat
http://www.vunet.org/kolumnit/millainen_yhteiskunta_kapitalismin_jalkeen-310.html