Very very simple
Dense and massive piece.
The slow time.
The beginning was a dense concentration of energy,
whose time was slow.
Therefore, the background radiation is very stretched. the radiation waves began to move less frequently.
Relative to existing energy-waves.
During the first stars, the energy was more frequent than the current stars.
During the first stars, the time was slow relative to the current time, the stars.
Therefore, the old light is known. generally redshifting
Old light waves came less frequently in relation to the existing light waves.
Space has always been there.
Space is not expanding or curving
The energy change of less high-density energy.
Even/also nucleus of atoms
http://onesimpleprinciple.com/296
.
Dense and massive piece.
The slow time.
The beginning was a dense concentration of energy,
whose time was slow.
Therefore, the background radiation is very stretched. the radiation waves began to move less frequently.
Relative to existing energy-waves.
During the first stars, the energy was more frequent than the current stars.
During the first stars, the time was slow relative to the current time, the stars.
Therefore, the old light is known. generally redshifting
Old light waves came less frequently in relation to the existing light waves.
Space has always been there.
Space is not expanding or curving
The energy change of less high-density energy.
Even/also nucleus of atoms
http://onesimpleprinciple.com/296
.
Vastaukset 2
Vanhimmat
Luuletko, että "teoriastasi" tulisi jotenkin täysin mystisellä tavalla sittenkin totta kun hoet ja toistat samoja virheitä yhtä uudestaan ja uudestaan ?
Siis miten "teoria", jonka mukaan joko rauta-atomit suhteessa toisiinsa tai sitten Maapallon muoto muuttuu voisi olla oikeassa, jos kuitenkaan näin ei tapahdu ?
Miksi tuo on niin saamarin vaikea vastata ?
Kaverilla on pakkomielle ja harhoja.
Jos itselläsi ei ole, älä jankkaa hänen kanssaan.