Porn Movie Studio Will Pursue the Blind
The pursued individual is just one of thousands in the lawsuit campaign against illegal file-sharers. However, it seems that he’s an unlikely candidate, because he’s legally blind. In addition, he’s too busy with his personal life to secure his wireless Internet connection. Unfortunately for him, an individual is also unable to afford to fight the court case in question and might be forced to settle.
Reiterations of the industry observers, saying that IP address does not necessarily connect to a pirate are now proved by another court case launched by porn industry. The media reported that a blind man appeared to find himself amongst the thousands of other people targeted in a mass P2P lawsuit. The industry suspects him of downloading a porn movie, which is quite an odd activity for a blind person.
An individual is accused of having downloaded an unauthorized copy of the copyrighted movie Tokyo Cougar Creampies 5 months ago, at 6 a.m. January 27. Perhaps, the porn industry believes that all blind people prefer to start their day early and with some revealing movie, otherwise its accusations are unclear.
When Mrs. Doe saw the ignominious title in the court papers, she couldn’t help laughing at the absurdity of the situation. The matter is that her husband is legally blind, having just 1% vision of that of a person with normal sight. Therefore, he is incapable of watching any movie, and this particular porno is no exception. An accused man believes that the accusations are a bit ridiculous, because his movie-watching ability is nonexistent. As for the rest of his family, there is hardly anyone starting their winter Thursday morning with a porn movie, including his kids of 4 and 6. Well, hopefully there isn’t.
In other words, we can see another example of how a mass lawsuit campaign can go wrong. Previously, the RIAA even sued dead people and those who didn’t have a computer for copyright violation. The ridiculous stories will keep emerging as long as copyright owners erroneously believe that an IP address always indicates a person responsible for copyright violation. They can as well open up a phone book and sue random people from it.
Unfortunately, a blind man will very likely not have any other choice than to settle because of the financial constraints. Meanwhile, the most likely reason for a lawsuit was Wi-Fi hacking.
The pursued individual is just one of thousands in the lawsuit campaign against illegal file-sharers. However, it seems that he’s an unlikely candidate, because he’s legally blind. In addition, he’s too busy with his personal life to secure his wireless Internet connection. Unfortunately for him, an individual is also unable to afford to fight the court case in question and might be forced to settle.
Reiterations of the industry observers, saying that IP address does not necessarily connect to a pirate are now proved by another court case launched by porn industry. The media reported that a blind man appeared to find himself amongst the thousands of other people targeted in a mass P2P lawsuit. The industry suspects him of downloading a porn movie, which is quite an odd activity for a blind person.
An individual is accused of having downloaded an unauthorized copy of the copyrighted movie Tokyo Cougar Creampies 5 months ago, at 6 a.m. January 27. Perhaps, the porn industry believes that all blind people prefer to start their day early and with some revealing movie, otherwise its accusations are unclear.
When Mrs. Doe saw the ignominious title in the court papers, she couldn’t help laughing at the absurdity of the situation. The matter is that her husband is legally blind, having just 1% vision of that of a person with normal sight. Therefore, he is incapable of watching any movie, and this particular porno is no exception. An accused man believes that the accusations are a bit ridiculous, because his movie-watching ability is nonexistent. As for the rest of his family, there is hardly anyone starting their winter Thursday morning with a porn movie, including his kids of 4 and 6. Well, hopefully there isn’t.
In other words, we can see another example of how a mass lawsuit campaign can go wrong. Previously, the RIAA even sued dead people and those who didn’t have a computer for copyright violation. The ridiculous stories will keep emerging as long as copyright owners erroneously believe that an IP address always indicates a person responsible for copyright violation. They can as well open up a phone book and sue random people from it.
Unfortunately, a blind man will very likely not have any other choice than to settle because of the financial constraints. Meanwhile, the most likely reason for a lawsuit was Wi-Fi hacking.
Vastaukset
Vanhimmat
Ei vielä vastauksia
Aloittaja odottaa vastauksia. Kerro oma näkemyksesi ensimmäisenä.